But because his religion imposes a vow of silence, the killer goes on to kill two other people. A clear demonstration, if you ask me, of the pernicious and irresponsible nature of such a vow.
But there are also secular laws that offer similar protection. Anything you tell your lawyer is privileged communication that can't be revealed to anyone. Someone accused of murder can admit to his lawyer that he actually committed the deed, and this does not free the lawyer from his obligation to provide his client with the best defense possible. This lawyer cannot tell the prosecutor, judge, victim's family, or
anyone of his client's admission.
If anything you (as a person accused of a crime) tell your lawyer could be leaked to other parties, your civil rights would be in jeopardy, since all accused are guaranteed a fair trial. The purpose of sealed communications is to ensure that a client doesn't feel restricted in what he can discuss with his counsel. Open communication allows the lawyer to have all the facts in order to devise the best strategy for a defense.
Similarly, doctor-patient communications are also privileged. If you are a pedophile seeking treatment from a psychiatrist, that doctor cannot tell anyone what you reveal -- even if you are currently molesting a child. If a doctor could turn you in for revealing what you've done or are doing, then presumably no pedophiles would seek treatment. In the long run, treating the pedophile so that he stops molesting the current child and molests no more children is worth the guarantee of confidential communication because without it, that pedophile may go on molesting many more children in the future.
I'm open to correction on this last point because there may be some loophole wherein the doctor can act if he believes the patient is an imminent danger to himself or others. But even in that case, it could be that his sole recourse is to have the patient committed and either forcibly medicated (with Depo-Provera or a similar drug) or delivered to rigourous treatment instead of actually being allowed to report him to authorities or otherwise break the seal of confidentiality.
It is, of course, an imperfect system; but as you can see, there are reasons for having it. I personally wouldn't be much consoled if I were the parent of a molested child and found out that I was never warned because it would have jeopardized the future safety of
other children.
reply
share