MovieChat Forums > Scaramouche (1952) Discussion > Sabatini would not be happy.

Sabatini would not be happy.


I know that over the years Hollywood has taken numerous liberties whenever a novel is converted to film, however, why on earth would they take a beautiful plot and twist it into another that did not pack quite the emotional punch the original did? I found that this film presented a watered down story that simply did not do the book justice. I cannot imagine why certain aspects were changed, such as how Madame Plousgatel was completely omitted from the film and how the count's relation to Andre was changed. Somehow I feel that most people would say time constraints, but leaving or changing certain parts made other parts seem out of place. One example would be how Andre's revolutionary speech was left out, which would make people who were not familiar with the story wonder why he was chosen to be a part of Congress, seeing as how Andre was not the best fencer in the academy and his friendship with Vilmorin was not mentioned by the deputy.

There is one aspect of the movie that I did enjoy and that was the costumes.
Oh, and the ending had me crying with laughter, but somehow I still prefer the book's ending. It was not quite as humorous, but it was unforgettable.

reply

I don't think a movie needs to be faithful to the book (if we want the exact original story, we can read the novel). The makers of the film clearly wanted a story that was a bit more linear and focused, whereas Sabatini's novel is divided into three more or less separate sections (Madame Plougastel doesn't even come into the novel until the last section). Some other changes increased the suspense, like making the final duel between two more-or-less evenly-matched competitors whereas in the book, Andre is clearly much better than his adversary and there's no real suspense about who's going to win. So all in all I think the movie works very well on its own terms and that's what matters.

reply

What's more, the book just wasn't very good. The movie's plot is very straightforward and contains more than a few scenes where the makers have cut corners quite a bit, but the movie still has a certain magical quality. I much prefer a good melodramatic movie to an embarassingly melodramatic book.

reply

A movie hardly ever follows the same as the book version anyway. Including Gone with the Wind.

reply


If Scaramouche were half as faithful as Gone with the Wind Sabatini would have no cause for distress.


It's used to be all girls with no clothes. Now it's all clothes and no girls.

reply

Sorry, but I must contradict you on this. I found the book to be quite well written with excellent character development, a solid plot that kept me tense almost to the very end... I dare say it's almost on a par with "The Three Musketeers". I'm not saying the movie isn't good, I find it quite netertaining and well put together, but having already read the book it kind of leaves a bitter-sweet aftertaste. As far as movies vs. books... I'd go for movies over books only as far as time is concerned (I admit I'm quite lazy), but a good book outdoes a good movie anytime. Still, depends on the book.

reply

There's rarley any justice to books when it comes to movie adaptations. There may be some exceptions, but they're few and far between. Take Sabtini's books: they made movies after "Captain Blodd", "The Sea Hawk", "The Black Swan", "Scaramouche" and maybe others I don't know of and the link to the book is a bit loose. To my shame, I admit I haven't read "The Black Swan" and "The Sea Hawk" but I can't seem to get a hold of them anywhere in this country. But the other two... Well, entire scenes are left out, the plot goes through signifficant changes... It seems that people would rather do films their own way rather than follow the book. Really now, "Scaramouche" would have been just as good if it was faithful to the book (I can hardly see any character development in this movie) and the extremely important battle of Maracaibo (or at least I think it was Maracaibo) was entirely left out of Captain Blood.

reply

What book?

reply

[deleted]