MovieChat Forums > The Naked Spur (1953) Discussion > Why the ending makes sense....spoilers.....

Why the ending makes sense....spoilers...


The ending is not a way to excuse the evil behavior of the Robert Ryan character in any way. It doesn't even make a moral statement against bounty hunting. The ending is the way the Jimmy Stewart character is able to let go of the past injustices done against him and his bitterness and obsessions that have resulted.

It's simply a way to move on and get a fresh start. Doesn't hurt that he has a woman there to walk with him in life, that certainly helps and he did kill the bad guy so that also helps him move on.

A more intelligent film than most people give it credit for and there is nothing old or dated about this film at all they could make it again today.

There is a Randolph Scott-Budd Boetticher film called "Ride Lonesome" that also deals with some of these same issues and builds up in some of those same ways but that is a personal vendetta for a horrible wrong done to Randolph Scott's character not a general bitterness that the Stewart character has to live with.

People need to give films like this a chance because there is a lot more there than you might think after one viewing.

8.5

reply

I think a lot of westerns benefit from another viewing after an intermission of time has passed. They usually weren't mindless movies.

_______
Stripping under the name Malcolm Sex, I pleased the ladies by any means necessary.

reply

SPOILER ALERT: Sockscats states that the Stewart character "killed the bad guy." Actually that is not true. Robert Ryan character murdered the Millard Mitchell character. Than the Ralph Meeker character killed the Robert Ryan character. Than the Meeker character was killed in the river by accident while the Stewart character was trying to pull him to shore with a rope.

reply

I thought it was a fine ending and for the period technically very well done. I'm not sure why some posters want to label it as "ridiculous". Ben is proven to be a cold-blooded killer, while Anderson, by his driven actions, yet again, demonstrates he arguably is more of a natural bounty hunter, than Kemp could ever hope to be.🐭

reply