MovieChat Forums > Mother Riley Meets the Vampire Discussion > Lugosi Kept us in Stitches....

Lugosi Kept us in Stitches....


So much of the dialogue given to Lugosi in this film is very witty and well written. And his delivery, even of a silly phrase, is executed brilliantly. When he first meets Mother Reilly his sheer, sinister delight is both eerie and provacative. His talk of bats and blood bring back memories of his earlier roles but also give a fresh, comical side to the "man in the cape".
Having to make a film with a robot, and a cheap one at that, could be quite a disaster but Lugosi deals beautifully. And he certainly doesn't treat the part with seriousness. That he plays the part so lightly, but still seems to dedicate himself to the role, makes the film all that more enjoyable.

One question though, "what exactly does Count von Housen call Mother Reilly as he exits the dining room?" Though Lugosi's accent is wonderful, in this case it got in the way...

reply

Bela Lugosi was a riot in this film. He totally camped it up to play a villain who was every cliche in the book. His delivery of every hammy line was perfectly handled. And he even had a little fun at the expense of his famous Dracula portrayal.

He certainly looked like he was enjoying himself.

reply

Steffy_chef asked

One question though, "what exactly does Count von Housen call Mother Reilly as he exits the dining room?" Though Lugosi's accent is wonderful, in this case it got in the way...

It is very hard to hear, but I have figured it out. (I also suspect there may have been some bad editing done.)

Go back to the scene where Lugosi, a henchman and (that rarity) a henchwoman are in the Control Room. This is at about 32:40 in the copy I legally downloaded from the internet Archive.

Henchwoman: Do you wish to see Mrs Riley?
Lugosi: Yes!
Henchwoman: Here is her chart.
Lugosi: Hmm. A poor specimen. But the right group!

So later, at 36:40, it's pretty much a certainty that what Lugosi says is
"Don't strain yourself, my lovely little group three!"

If the audience at the time had understood it, they might have found it funny.

I also have a theory - that people were allotted ration books according to need. Group 3 may have been the most needy. I have found nothing to support that . But it would have been a good joke, with Lugosi's own group-system humorously echoing the UK rationing system.

reply

[deleted]