What you have to understand is that the USA has a very different idea of who Hans Christian Andersen was in the first place. The rest of the world puts him into nearly the same category as Edgar Allan Poe or E.T.A. Hoffmann, and deservedly so; most of his stories, after all, have unhappy endings, and are most powerful in the way they set a mood. In the USA, they think, "He wrote fairy-stories, therefore he wrote for kids, therefore the unhappy endings are mistakes that we have to fix." (Is is any wonder that German for "happy ending" is "das Happyend" and Japanese for "happy ending" is "happiendu"?)
Danny Kaye would have been an awful actor to play the real Andersen.
But, as the opening of the movie plainly says (so it's not fair to complain), this movie is a fairy tale about Andersen. And for this fairy-tale movie, Kaye is perfect; it's probably the best thing he ever did (and it's one of Loesser's greatest scores, too).
Curiously enough, the movie itself flirts with tragedy. It is more true to the spirit of Andersen in its own story than in the way it presents his.
reply
share