MovieChat Forums > The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet (1952) Discussion > History has been very unkind to this sho...

History has been very unkind to this show


I had never even heard of this show until I saw someone on IMDB recommend it.

I watched a few episodes on youtube. But eventually I couldn't take it any more because the video quality is so bad (i.e. 240p).

I can tell it is a high quality show.

It's quite shameful that it is not available in its entirety on any sort of home video format.

It's also quite shameful that it has not been extremely popular in reruns.

What happened?

Why did history treat this show so badly?

I'm sure this show would be a lot more popular in 2016 if most people knew that it existed, and if proper home video releases of it were available.

reply

Ricky Nelson's youngest son was supposed to remaster from the original 35mm negatives and do a complete 1952-1966 DVD release, but it never panned out. I guess the cost put an end to the project. The show was reran in the 1980's on The Disney Channel and hosted by Harriet and David Nelson. After that it fell into obscurity.

reply

Ricky Nelson's youngest son was supposed to remaster from the original 35mm negatives and do a complete 1952-1966 DVD release, but it never panned out.


So why doesn't he just sell some of the rights (perhaps he could even sell them for only a temporary period, like say, 10 years) to a professional company who can get that job done?

Wouldn't that be in everyone's best interests, including his own?

I don't understand what might motivate him not to do that?

reply

I don't understand that either. He even had a page taking donations for the restoration project and it looked like he reached the financial goal. Then nothing else was said about it.

I think a lot of the fault of the show falling into obscurity was David Nelson. After the 1980's Disney Channel Run, David kind of let the show disappear instead of keeping it in reruns like Leave It To Beaver, Bewitched etc...

reply

It is much more complicated than that. This show's negatives were not
stored very well, because it was shot (at General Service Studios) and not
owned by a major studio. Episodes are literally missing from the 14 years,
and there are very few master positives in decent condition. The family
either didn't care, or gave control over to others who didn't care.

Another problem is the massive changes in pop culture. Things have changed
so greatly in 60 years, that many, many younger people cannot possibly
relate to the malt shops, lazy conversations, and ultra-light scripts. The
show is not "edgy" or even laugh out loud funny (like "I Love Lucy"). "Leave
it to Beaver" (a show I could never get into) endures because its told from
the eyes of a young boy and his brother. O & H is way too "nostalgic", and
its charms spring from a 1950's that never really existed to begin with. By
contrast, Lucy, Fred and Ethel seem real - they fight, travel, and garner
genuine studio laughs (and let's fact it - the canned laughter on O & H is
among the most artificial ever used).

It's really sad because the show pushed the career of Rick Nelson, who was
a genuinely talented performer. HE was so sexy, but the show was not. And
as the series moved into the 1960's, then the mid-1960's, the aura of the
show remained as though it were still 1955.

It was a indeed a quality series, with lovely humor between Ozzie and Harriet.
But the comedy is too slight, and the dated elements overwhelm its
considerable charms.

Final note: the "TV shows on DVD" thing became way over-saturated ten years
ago, with truly great shows like "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" failing to
get a total release. Don't hold your breath that this series - which too
many young and middle-aged folks would label a "relic" - will get a full
release. To much time has moved on, and it will simply not happen.

reply

This show doesn't need new young viewers to be profitable - at least not for the next 20 or 30 years. The baby boomers who are alive right now are more than enough to keep it profitable over the next two or three decades.

As for young people not being able to relate to malt shops etc., that's doesn't matter very much. They will be able to relate to the fact that their hearts long for a better world than the completely trash world which the liberals of the last few generations have left for them...a better world as shown in O&H, before the barbarians took over and ruined it. That would likely make O&H remain popular among all normal people for all-time.

reply

Sorry, you are incorrect. If "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" (a truly GREAT series)
can't get a full release, then don't hold your breath for this one. (And,
according to YOUR argument, there would be enough baby-boomers to support its
release). Also, there are missing episodes, and many that aren't in any
shape to get a release.

And, like it or not, too many eps of O and H are routine and forgettable. Even
David Nelson admitted that too many episodes fade from memory, as they were
slight and so much alike.

I enjoy this show too, but I would never pay a to of money for a box set of
the whole series. Too many, and way too many that are, well, routine and
forgettable.

The smarter thing would be a "Best of", with around 200 episodes, chronicling
the years 1952 to '66.

reply

The show fell into public domain. The way ozzie copyrighted the ending of the show did not hold up to the copyright laws established in the 70's. I have many of the episodes on youtube from the original 16mm prints that are in great quality. My Uncle worked on the show. There were at least 7-10 copies of every episode, and then different prints were made when the show would repeat, because they had to change the commercials. There are not a lot of episodes lost.

reply

There ARE lost episodes, whether you know this or not. First of all, very few
of the last season have been seen in YEARS. Secondly, many of those are 16MM
black-and-white prints - of COLOR shows. And by the way, 16MM cannot compare
to 35MM, which is the standard for topnotch release.

Even David Nelson confessed to poor storage for this series.

reply

I'm not the one you want to argue with about the show, and I am not trying to argue with you. I have every episode from the last season in both color and black and white. I knew all the people involved and know the show show and info about the show more than the average person would. I knew the Nelson's! Poor Storage is thru, but I was very close with David and I was even in the place where they were stored. Until you have seen the prints I have you can't comment on quality. I agree 35mm is the way to go, but the ones I have are in really good shape and have been archived to DVD and digitally stored. You really should look at YouTube if you think very few things from the last season have been seen in years.

reply

Sorry, but I would NEVER pay for a season-by-season (or boxed set) of this show
with 16 MM prints, especially with the quality of today's TV's, which are very
tough on old shows.

I have all eight seasons of "Bewitched." Unfortunately, about three or four
were struck from 16MM, and boy, can you tell the difference. But for now, the
35 MM masters are either lost or unattainable.

I think it is pretty obvious we will never see a full release of O & A. The
costs are too prohibitive to release the show the way it should be released -
435 eps from crisp 35 MM RESTORED prints. Too bad.

reply

They are not lost, all of the 435 episodes are in the film library at UCLA. 16mm or 35mm if you are a true fan, you would be happy just to see the episodes as opposed to never seeing them at all. Some of the 16mm prints I have are crystal clear...and I have had many comment that on certain episodes. Now some are better than others, but very viewable. There will never be a release of every season on DVD. If there were, I agree they should come from the restored 35mm prints, so I'm speaking on comments I hear from fans of the episodes I have posted, because I have many that the fans have never seen before or have never been on a DVD release or ones that never aired on Disney etc. They are just happy to see them because they probably won't see them in any other format. I have around 375 of the 435 episodes, but there were some of the prints I inherited from my Uncle that I couldn't do anything with because of vinegar syndrome that had deteriorated some of them.

reply

Your points are well taken. And I'm sure I have enjoyed some of the episodes
you have posted. Still, it's too bad that an entire release (yes, from 35MM)
has never happened. I stand corrected then that none are lost.

On a lighter note, I will share this thought: Many, many years ago (the early
'80's), I worked at Winchell's Donuts in Encino. Several celebrities came in
regularly, including David Nelson. He would order one donut and a small coffee,
and sit with his back to the front glass doors, so as to not be recognized. Still,
he was very quiet and pleasant. I wanted so many times to tell him how much I
enjoyed the show (he was often in there when the place was empty), but I was
terribly shy, and felt I would be disturbing him. I could kick myself for not
at least thanking him for his work, and that '81 Christmas Special on the series,
which I believe he produced.

reply

I was close with David, and he was such a great guy! You should have said something to him, he would have taken the time to talk to you and not have minded at all. Thanks for sharing that with me. I wish I had a copy of that 81 Christmas special. I know a couple of fans who have it, but they won't share it and I don't know why. Kent McCord was in that as well. He Connie Harper Nelson (She played Miss Edwards on the show) and I were all discussing that last year and hoped to see it again. I apologize if I came off the wrong way to you earlier. There is so much misinformation out there regarding the show and the Nelson's I guess I get a tad bit defensive about it. They were really good people and I'm very proud a member of my family was a part of the show. My uncle even worked on Ozzie's Girls...Ozzie was very good to all the cast and crew who worked on the show.

reply

I have a very poor (but not unwatchable) VHS copy, which I'd be happy to mail to
you, if you want it.

You never came off as mean-spirited - just knowledgeable and protective of your
family.


Curiously, the other actor who came in (and also ordered one donut and coffee)
and sat with his back to the doors was Herb Anderson, who played Henry
Mitchell on "Dennis the Menace." Again, very quiet, but pleasant. I never
got up my nerve to speak to him either. Always wondered what would happen if
they came in at THE SAME TIME!

reply

[deleted]

It's my pleasure. So strange that, as a family associate, so to speak, that
this show has never been made available to you. I taped it off of KTLA
channel 5 when it aired, Christmas '81.

I hope you have a VCR, because it's on video tape.

In exchange for the postage "fee" (which I would never accept), perhaps
you can find a way to upload it on Youtube.

It's too bad Rick couldn't be part of this offering, but we see Parley
Baer ("Darby"), Mary Jane Croft ("Clara) and the tragic James Stacy, who
credits Ozzie for breaking him into the business.

Highlight: Harriet discusses how she and Ozzie met, and how he proposed.

Another memory: I used to watch this show on KTLA in the early '70's
at 3:30 in the afternoon. The day Ozzie passed, KTLA acknowledged his
death by showing that afternoon's rerun sans commercials. Funny what we
recall.

I will email you privately and get your mailing address. Do you live in
L.A.?

reply

Hi Mike--

It's been interesting to read your comments. Are all 435 episodes in the public domain? I see someone named bandstandmike has posted some episodes on Youtube. Is that you? I am wondering how many episodes you've put on Youtube. Thanks.

Jarrod

reply

Hi Jarrod, yes that's me, and yes the entire show is in public domain. I'm not sure how many I have on there. I think it's over 200. I have them all organized in a playlist if you go to my channel page and select playlists, that should say how many are on the playlist.

reply

Wonderful. Thanks for the reply. I will subscribe to your YouTube page and check the playlist carefully. About five years ago, I bought some episodes of Ozzie & Harriet from a seller on another website but it wasn't the whole series obviously. I appreciate your putting the ones you have online, as it makes re-viewing much easier than pulling the discs out of storage. I think I even bought Ozzie's autobiography and a book about painting Kristin had published-- in a box somewhere in storage. I wanted to know as much about the Nelsons as I could. My feeling is that with 14 years, despite the "fictionalized" aspects of the stories, we get a real sense of family history on screen. It's like they were a forerunner of a reality TV series, since they were all playing (mild) versions of themselves. There is so much to sift through and discuss about this great family.

Just checked your Youtube page-- it looks like you are a fan of Guiding Light (so am I). Did you know someone who worked on GL? I watched a clip you had featuring Michael Zaslow--truly one of daytime's best actors.

reply

No problem Jarrod. I would be interested to know if you have some of the episodes I don't have. I have around 375, but I know there are about 400 out there that can be obtained. I would like to find those at least. Yes, my best friend was on Guiding Light...he played Michael's son on the show. I spent a lot of time in the GL studio back in the 90's and became lifelong friends with some of the cast and crew. Great memories! Let me know if you can sometime what O&H episodes you have. You will see I have a lot you can't find anywhere else.

reply

Mike,

I remember Roger (Michael's character) had two sons-- Hart and Sebastian, but Sebastian did not come on the scene until the early 2000s. Recently, I was thinking about the longevity of GL-- I started watching it as a kid during summer vacation from school in 1979. When we got our first VCR in 1985, all the way through to 2009, I'm sure I didn't miss any episode and must have seen over 5000 of them. I'd love to hear some of the backstage stories sometime!

Re: episodes of Ozzie & Harriet, I just checked and I'm afraid those discs were in the box the UPS lost. I moved last July from Colorado to Arizona. Every box made it except one. I couldn't remember exactly what was in the one that didn't make it-- now I know! I can't begin to describe the level of incompetence I dealt with when part of the shipment was lost-- they paid me for what I had insured it at, but it was very frustrating; I never expected to not ever see those things again when I sent them off.

As I said previously, I had bought the discs on other site (iOffer) and the vendor told me they were the only episodes that had been syndicated. What does that mean-- does it mean they never reran all the episodes, only certain ones from each season? I remember a few of the episodes on those discs, especially from the early seasons when the kids were young, were remakes of radio episodes-- and they must have used the same scripts because the dialogue was verbatim when I listened to some audio recordings of the radio version.

When you talked about "vinegar" earlier, does that mean the films have chemically disintegrated? Are we talking about unwatchable scenes, or the whole film is ruined? Do you think Sam Nelson is missing any episodes? Or all they all still intact somewhere? I haven't looked at the UCLA collection online.

reply

My friend played Hart on GL...well actually I'm friends to this day with all of the actors who played that role. lol There wasn't a cast member I didn't know that was on there from 1993 or so till the end. I went thru something very similar with UPS. Ozzie and Dave edited around 200 episodes for syndication. Back then that process was so slow they stopped at around 200. Some of those never even re-ran on Disney in the 80's. Vinegar Syndrome is where the film deteriorates at turns to goop...literally. If that happens, it's pretty much ruined.

reply

I just watched an episode of GL you posted from 1990. It must have been from right before Memorial Day weekend, according to one of the commercials that was included. The main difference between soaps then and soaps now is how well-defined the characters are. Pam Long was my favorite headwriter on GL, and you can see how she is presenting very strongly women defined, like Vanessa, Nadine, Holly, Maureen, Harley and Alexandra. The men too: Josh, Billy, Frank, Rick, A.C.-- these are very simple characterizations but they are clearly defined and they all act very specifically. Pam's southern upbringing is also very discernible in the way the characters are established and presented. Dylan seems the most southern to me. I think the plots are quite slow but it almost doesn't matter, because it's the characters and who they are that makes the show worth watching.

I watched an episode of Days of Our Lives earlier and caught Jordi Vilasuso playing Dario. I thought he was just great as the first Tony Santos on GL. He still retains a boyish charm and slightly neurotic, almost whiny Brando quality. I love watching him.

Getting back to Ozzie & Harriet, I see you uploaded around 250 episodes. Do you have a blog where you comment on each episode? I figured not all of them ever made it into syndication. When you say they edited them, does that mean they pared them down to add in more commercials? I'd hate to think they were ever edited for reasons of political correctness. Though this show is so wholesome, I doubt there is anything very controversial by today's standards.

reply

I have saved the last 25 years of GL and archived it on DVD if you can believe it? It took a better part of 10 years to do. I know Jordi, he actually just did a film a friend of mine produced. He's a really nice guy.

I don't do any sort of a blog. I participate in a couple fan groups on Facebook and share behind the scenes photos and memories of my Uncle's and personal memories I have from the ones I knew from the family and the show. Aside from that and YouTube, nothing else. They were edited because commercials run a lot longer then they did when the episodes originally aired, and several of Rick's songs were cut out later because of copyright. Luckily, I have so many of the original prints with his music and the original commercials still intact.

reply

You were smart to save episodes of GL since it will never be rerun. I'm sure it has been labor intensive putting them on YouTube. I always recorded over the episodes I taped. Probably my favorite period of the show is the San Cristobal storyline James Harmon Brown & Barbara Eisenstein wrote. And Claire Labine and Millee Taggart did some interesting stuff immediately afterward. Those plots honored the long-time characters and gave us a fun-to-watch romance with Richard & Cassie. Plus I thought Edmond was a good replacement villain when Roger left the show. It's also when the Santoses came in, and Saundra Santiago did such a fantastic job as Carmen. I loved when she let Vanessa take the fall for Ben Warren's death, which her daughter Pilar had caused. The Reva clone story was wild but at least they were attempting to try something different. So I'd say episodes from 1997-2002 is really what I'd love to see again.

I looked some more at your O&H playlist. I like the episode where Ozzie recruits the Tigers (neighborhood boys) to go to the dance Harriet and the other women are putting on. Do you have that one? It didn't seem to be uploaded.

What's your favorite episode? Did your uncle have a favorite one?

reply

It's a lot of work! LOL I'm not a fan of many of the storylines after 1997. The show changed a lot. 2002-2005 were not bad, but after that it was down hill. Saundra was good on the show. I'm still friends with her and Paul Anthony Stewart. I prefer the 1988-1996 years.

The episode you mentioned I do have, I just don't have it posted yet.

I don't have a particular favorite episode...there are too many episodes from the series to just have one. I really like "The High Cost Of Dating", "Getting Wally Into Shape", "The Sea Captain", "Dave The Worrier" "The Ghost Town" and all the Christmas episodes. My Uncle never mentioned a favorite, he would probably say all of them. lol

reply

Re: GL-- I didn't like Ellen Weston's headwriting from 2002-03. She had been an actress on the show in the 60s but I felt she didn't understand the characters. And as great as Carrie Nye was in the Marianne Carruthers story, it was basically a rehash of what she had done as Susan Piper around 1984 (during Pam Long's first tenure as headwriter). I do think Kim Zimmer was fantastic in the episode where psychic Reva was possessed by Marianne's spirit and the whole mystery was finally resolved. It seemed like something out of Dark Shadows.

Weston's partner John Conboy was also not as good a producer as Paul Rauch had been, and it seemed to be falling apart. When Ellen Wheeler & David Kreizman took over, there was new energy-- and I did like the casting of Tom Pelphrey as Jonathan, which referenced Reva giving up a son down in San Cristobal so all that came full circle. But the loss of Laura Wright as Cassie was something the show did not recover from, then when Beth Ehlers left, everything was put on Kim to carry the show as Reva. When they changed their production model and filmed out in New Jersey, it was a huge change and it really wasn't the same anymore. I just feel that 97 to 02 is the last real renaissance period, then it struggles along admirably till 05, then it just begins to crash and burn.

The 88 to 96 years were interesting. All the stuff Pam Long did during her second tenure from 87 to late 90 was brilliant. Losing the great Bev McKinsey in the summer of '92 was a huge bump in the road. Some of the mid-90s stuff written by Megan McTavish is interesting-- Jenna & Roger; the beginning of Blake & Ross; Holly & Fletcher; the wacko Brent/Marian story; Dinah & Hart; Matt & Vanessa with her unnamed disease (have to laugh about that one). But there were things that didn't work in the 90s-- talented Marcy Walker never seemed to fit in as Tangie; killing off Nadine was a mistake; a recast for Ed that didn't work, ironic since Robert Gentry had played the role much earlier; and the removal of Michael Zaslow as Roger (never understood all that).

Do you know any of the actors from other New York based soaps? I do have hundreds of episodes of Search for Tomorrow (I checked and those discs are still in my collection). Aside from Jane Krakowski who's been the most visible, I've wondered what happened to a lot of the SFT cast.

Getting back to Ozzie and family-- the ghost town episode is definitely a classic. Wally seems to be used a lot more in the last few seasons. A thought I've had as I've been going over your playlist is how Norman Rockwell these titles are. Ozzie definitely found inspiration-- his wife and sons and later the sons' wives were all muses for him. I wonder why the in-laws (especially the Harmons) weren't written into the stories. And also, why in the final season, the boys weren't allowed to start having kids. Instead of the Ozzie's Girls show in the 70s, they really should have done a program focusing on Ozzie & Harriet's young grandkids.



reply

Paul Rauch is the one who ruined the show by firing many of the longtime characters, or putting them on the back burner to try to gain a younger viewing audience, and that didn't work out very well. GL had longtime viewers, and that's why a lot stopped watching the show. He was not well liked by many either. Michael was let go because of his illness, which wasn't right, but Michael could also be very difficult which I also think played a factor. He deserved much better, because he carried the show in many ways during the years Kim Zimmer was gone. I met people from other soaps, but I can't remember off hand who all I did meet. That's been quite awhile ago now. The only ones I became personal friends with were from GL. Speaking of Brent/Marion, Frank Beaty who played that role is another good friend. We spent some time together this past summer. He's a great guy!

reply

I know Maeve Kinkead (Vanessa) did not get along with Rauch, something I found interesting considering he had cast her on Another World in the 70s, which was her first important role. I read they fought over her hair color. She wanted to go gray, and he forced her to keep dying it-- when Vanessa shot Ben Warren and lapsed into a coma, then she was allowed to go gray for awhile. LOL On the other hand, Grant Aleksander (Phillip) seemed to like Rauch and said Rauch was working on an online version of GL but died before it could launch. Some of the young ones that were on the frontburner in the late 90s were very good-- Joy Lenz who played Michelle went on to do primetime work; Tammy Blanchard who played Drew was in a TV movie as Judy Garland; and of course Jordi has worked consistently.

You're right about Michael Zaslow deserving a better exit. When he died a few years later, there was a nice tribute for him in People magazine. He's probably the only one in the history of the show who will ever get that type of recognition. The deaths of the others will be covered in the soap publications but not in the mainstream entertainment media like Zaslow. He definitely was a legend and both his tenures on the show were sensational.

I appreciate your sharing these memories. It helps me appreciate the show and its talented cast and crew in retrospect. I wish someone would write a book on these people and the whole golden age of soap opera production. Just like I wish someone would do a reappraisal of the Nelsons. I finished going over the playlist of the titles you have uploaded. From memory I was trying to recall which ones I didn't have and haven't seen yet. Did your uncle give you all the Ozzie's Girls episodes too? Or just the few you've posted?

reply

He didn't have all the Ozzie's Girls episodes...Ozzie did not own that show outright like "The Adventures". I have a few more, but haven't got around to them yet.

reply

Thanks Mike for all the detailed replies the past few days on this thread. When I get time this weekend, I will be enjoying some of the O&H episodes you've posted. Thank you for making the content available to everyone. On another note, I might send a private message later with more observations/questions about GL, if that's okay. - Jarrod

reply

You're very welcome, and you can message me anytime! I'm going to upload "The Tigers Go To A Dance" for you tonight or tomorrow!

reply

Wonderful! Can't wait to see it again. I just had a bit of free time and watched a different one with Barry Livingston-- 'The Barking Dog.' I like how we see all of these neighbors, little Barry, the dog, the people at the roadside cafe, the guy at the butcher shop, etc.-- Ozzie gives us a fun story with help from a nice supporting cast.

reply

Connie Harper Nelson is the one that plays the waitress at the roadside cafe. She also played Dave's secretary Miss Edwards on the show. She married Ozzie's younger brother Don in real life, and was also Ozzie's real life secretary. She and I talk everyday!

reply

Thanks for the trivia. I had actually looked up Don Nelson's credits on the IMDb yesterday. When I saw his date of birth was over 20 years after Ozzie, I found that to be interesting. Was he a half-sibling of Ozzie's (not that it makes a difference)...I have a younger half-brother who was born when I was 19. I like Connie's performances. Truth be told, I prefer the stuff from 1960 to 1966 best...it feels like they've shed the radio sitcom format and by that point, they are doing miniature movies. In 'The Barking Dog' episode, I like how Ozzie takes the camera out of the studio set and we get a lot of exterior action on the road and at the lake. They should have turned the dog into a recurring character.

reply

No, Don was his full Brother.

reply

Thanks for uploading 'The Tigers Go to a Dance.' I just really enjoy this one, the ending is so cute. I love watching them do all the grown-up dances. So funny. By the way, in a few moments, I will be sending a private message to you here on the IMDb with some detailed thoughts I had about the series. If you don't get the message, please let me know. - Jarrod

reply

You're welcome and ok.

reply

[deleted]