MovieChat Forums > A Streetcar Named Desire (1951) Discussion > How could people find Marlon Brando hot ...

How could people find Marlon Brando hot in this film


He's character was so disgusting that makes me want to almost throw up just seing his face. Amazing actor though, brilliant performance but what a horrible, horrible character.

reply

He's character was so disgusting that makes me want to almost throw up just seing his face. Amazing actor though, brilliant performance but what a horrible, horrible character.
I agree on both counts. Brando's Kowalski as a physical "object" was beautiful, but his character itself was never meant to add to his beauty. Kowalski's beauty was almost a paradox for both, the two women in the film and for the audience - despite loathing his actions, they can't help being attracted to his features.

Most performances by male actors are supposed to be judged on their talent - which is a double standard in view of the importance of a lead actress's beauty - but Kowalski is a character whose portrayal can't be effective unless he is played by an exceptionally good-looking actor. If he were ugly, the audience would never understand why Stella hasn't left him after three scenes into the play.

reply

[deleted]

Nah. That behavior was brutish aggression, but not abusive. Stella was attracted to this, while Blanche on the other hand was repulsed by the aggression.

reply

Blanche was not repulsed by Stanley. In fact she was insanely attracted to him. What did repulse her was his ignorant views on everything.

Stanley was not repulsed by Blanche. He wanted her from the get go. Probably to the point where he thought he married the wrong sister. What he hated was the class warfare she used against him.

So the repulsion was not physical it was intellectual. Intellectual revulsion smacking right up against a wall made of sexual attraction. That is why their interactions with one another were so unstable.

Of course, it helped a lot that Brando and Leigh were so scarily attractive. And they tried so hard to make Leigh look faded but it didn't work at all. In fact that the was the film's only misstep. They should have walked on the wild side and let Leigh keep her raven locks.

reply

I didn't say she was repulsed by Stanley, I said she was repulsed by the aggression.

reply

She liked his aggression just fine. It was his ignorance that repulsed her.

The problem with Stanley is not that he is dumb, he is just too stubborn to change his ignorance. He thinks the world should bend to serve him not the other way around.

reply

Because we can separate the actor from the character.

http://40.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvbx9bGoj71qm2xu4o1_1280.jpg

reply

Exactly! And this was Brando in his prime. So he is wonderful to look at and admire! His acting is just okay (maybe more outstanding back in the day but a little over the top now). He was good looking, and had charisma, as an actor and all of that is very visible in this film!

"Getting old is not for sissies."
Bette Davis

reply

People are blinded by muscles...






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

While his character was mostly loathsome, there was another aspect of his character that one could relate to. To digress a little, I bet his character was bipolar.

Anyway, most notably Stanley and his chums lost it when they got drunk, perhaps because that was the only time when their anger showed about their impoverished lives and the little control that they had in doing better for themselves and their families. But then there was this more controlled side that came across when he was sober.

Also, he seemed especially upset with Blanche before learning about her past because after being disappointed with himself, the last thing he needed was someone looking their nose down on him. And his wife didn't ease that feeling when she said that she stretched the truth about how they were living and kept telling him to be nice to him. In his mind, their house and he himself was not good enough for Blanche to be around. She was the top and he was the bottom and he could not even attempt to change things around, that is, until he learned the truth. The film even lends to that change when Stanley is, for the first time in the film, dressed decently while telling Stella the truth about Blanche's background.

If you want to understand Stanley, take your unemployed husband around a rich family member and watch the change. That is the beauty of Stanley. He is an every man in raw form. Talk to a bunch of married women and they will tell you about their on dealings with 'Stanley'. What you are seeing is his frustration with himself being focused onto others, especially Blanche who is trying to turn his own wife against him, a wife who was satisfied with their small apartment, their community, and him until Blanche came around. Stella realizing that she wanted more was great, but Stanley knew that such notions would exclude him because he could not give her more. I believe that he was most afraid of losing his wife and child which intensified his hatred for Blanche.

As for the rape, rape is about power which, as I stated already, he had very little of. Your average rapist is a very insecure man who needs to dominate a woman in such a way in a fickle attempt to gain power, and that was Stanley. I'm not trying to excuse his vile and criminal deed, just getting in his mind to explain what led up to it. The ironic part is that while he was trying his best to keep his home together, it was this twisted grab for power that broke up his family.

reply

I love this movie sooo much because of how complex the characters are. I bet the writer went through first drafts where it was a simple case of a crazy sister in law moving in with them and Stan being the smart guy he is figures her deal out and exposes her. Instead of doing that he throws in foreshadowing of his abusive mean streak, but still on a redeemable level, up until to the point where he becomes irredeemable with the rape.

Making Blanche sympathetic by the ending is great. Because up until that point there's really no reason to like her. She's a compulsive liar and you figure out early on that she's full of s--t. She seduces Mitch because he's an easy guy to manipulate. She's a smug elitist upper class woman who looks down on Stanley and the life her sister is living. She's attention seeking and constantly needs reaffirmation and pity.

Leaving at that, you'd still have a decent story where all the mysteries would be resolved and the sister would be the antagonist and the movie would conclude with her being committed to a mental asylum and the happy couple would live happily ever after.

I can imagine the writer going "I can make it better" and thus there was complexity thrown to Stanley by making him a POS and Blanche was made sympathetic with the ending.

God damn fantastic writing right here. Easily one of the best dramas ever made.

reply

I agree with everything you said from the standpoint of how the play came to be and the writing process that may have taken place. I also appreciate complex characters. It seems like Tennessee Williams had a knack for that. Take Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, which I could write about forever. You dont love or hate any character because each is so complex.

reply

I hated Stanley and wished someone had killed him.

reply

Uh...because finding Marlon Brando hot has nothing to do with the character Stanley Kowalski.

And anyway, some women like brutes.


"Why couldn't the monkey arrange this from INSIDE the garbage can?"

reply

Marlon/Stanley was in full possession of animalistic, Neanderthal appeal. He was all brute sex. More than almost any other male character, Stanley invokes man's most basic instincts. (Plus he was physically gorgeous) Looking at it from that point of view, I think the real question is how could people NOT find him hot in this film.

reply

Because he looks like a freaking Greek god !!!!! His arms...lips...hair ...face...yadda is PERFECTION !!!!!

reply

Brando's so natural, brutal and raw that the sympathy's all on his side, not that posturing, simpering ham actress/con artist Blanche Du Bois. If Vivien Leigh could act at all, that may have helped Blanche out a little. As it stands, genuine feeling is alien to her and everything's artificial and calculated. She waltzes in, disrupts a happy marriage with her hoity-toity snobbery and unleashes something harsh in Stanley. No one exactly deserves that, but you can see the motivation.

reply