MovieChat Forums > The Sea Around Us (1953) Discussion > Irwin Allen's Sensationalist Documentar...

Irwin Allen's Sensationalist Documentary


Being a diver and living in Fort Lauderdale, I respect and appreciate the beauty of all sea life. That includes sharks, manta rays, moray eels, and other "slimy" sea creatures. I don't just kill them for no reason. I cringed when I saw the diver spear the manta ray and moray eel and then gut the shark! The animals were not threatening the diver and it was obviously gratuitous.

I understand that the undersea world was relatively new when Rachel Carson wrote her book. But I view a large part of Irwin Allen's movie preys on the ignorance of the public and misinforms them rather than to educate them. It exaggerates the dangers of undersea life to man and sensationalizes the stereotypes of many sea creatures, portraying tham as evil and deserving death by all means. Irwin Allen later used the same MO to produce his blockbuster movie thrillers.

I much preferred Jacques Cousteau's documentaries a decade later. They were more professional and based on facts. He, at least, had respect for the sea, and was an advocate for protecting the oceans.

reply

I think you must judge any historic work in its own context, not ours. This was released in 1953. Things were different then, especially marine science and movies. Not condoning those actions, just observing the situation. Sea Hunt http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0051311/ and Flipper http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057748/ followed this, and had some similarities, scientifically.
  
Style must be taken in its context.

Edit: URLs added.

reply

"judge any historic work in its own context, not ours. This was released in 1953. Things were different then, especially marine science and movies."

When have Manta Rays attacked humans? Ever??? or Octopii? It's not just inaccurate, it's 180 degrees from the truth and hard to view as anything but ignorant callous malicious sensationalism.

reply