MovieChat Forums > Scrooge (1951) Discussion > Wages/Pay for employees.

Wages/Pay for employees.


I watched this movie tonight and was wondering how much Mr. Scrooge paid his employees. He paid Bob Cratchit....15 shillings a week. He paid his maid...2 shillings a week. He paid the boy to buy a goose....1/2 crown or 1 shilling (?). When he woke up on Christmas Day he gave the maid a "Guinea" and increased her wages to 10 shillings a week.
15 shillings= $.75 cents. 2 shillings= $.10 cents. Guinea= $1.05. Crown= $.25 cents.

reply

It needs to be considered that those paltry sums, in present day terms, are pocket change, but back in the 1850's the buying power would have been quite considerably greater.
If you recall when Scrooge was eating in the inn and stopped a passing waiter to ask for "More bread", the waiter replied, "That's ha' penny extra sir" (1/2 cent).
That does give some kind of perspective about the value of money at that time, where a penny actually had some buying power, unlike now.
Here in Canada the penny was phased out of our currency a few years ago, so now our smallest coin is the nickel, whose days might indeed be numbered...

reply

Your conversions are a bit off.

The old shilling equaled 12 pence. Or, 12 pence made up one shilling.

So, 15 shillings was actually 180 pence. 2 shillings would have been 24 pence.

A guinea was worth 21 shillings, or a little more than a British pound. A pound was 20 shillings.

So if Scrooge gives the maid a guinea on Christmas morning, and that's worth 21 shillings, he gave more to her in one shot than he pays Cratchit for a whole week of work (15 shillings). No wonder she ran out the door overjoyed.

A crown is 5 shillings, so half a crown is 2 1/2 shillings, or 30 pence.

I just found a conversion website online. Who knows if it's accurate, but it claims that 1 British pound in 1843 is the equivalent of $124.43 cents in today's American dollar.

reply

It's always seemed odd that they had both pounds and guineas, when the latter was worth only five percent more than the former. It's like having both a dollar bill, and a dollar-and-five-cent bill. What's the point?

reply

Not sure of your point, but Cratchitt was not underpaid for his job. For all the years he put up with Scrooge's general abuse, would he not be better served simply getting a job elsewhere for more?

Scrooge was forced to pay him the going rate, otherwise he wouldn't have had any clerk. That he had to pay him that much to sit home on Christmas really gnawed at him.

reply