What a dreadful ending


What a seriously stupid ending, it wasn't even pulled of well enough, not from a technical nor storywise perspective. It seemed like someone said, hey what's the fastest and cheapest way to end this thing and get the lead to redeem himself. Damn. I would have been better if he had just gone home and shot himself, having a breakdown of some sort or just continue being a bastard but that ending and that dreadful dialog, for not to mention that last shot with those two "lovers" leaving the station was so chlised, stupid and not fitting the story at all.


The rest of the film was brilliant though.

Somebody here has been drinking and I'm sad to say it ain't me - Allan Francis Doyle

reply


No replies.

Wonder why?

reply

yeah really.

reply

No I don't think so. McLeod was a neurotic time bomb waiting to go off. First he beats to death a suspect by rupturing his stomach, then goes off on his wife. Why did her past even have anything to do with a police story? After about a year I pulled it from the collection as I just didn't like it anymore.

Admittedly Joseph Wiseman's Charlie did steal some of the show here. Played the part well.

reply

Actually, the film had already derailed badly about the half way through when whoever wrote this, inexplicably started to turn it into some cheesy, trite and tiresome soap opera. And that´s what it ultimately is, by and large - an overwrought melodrama and sort of a half cocked character study with some other strange police station shenanigans thrown in for good measure. Oh and besides - why is it called "Detective Story" in the first place? There´s no detecting going on nor is there much in the way of a "story".



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

What a seriously stupid ending, it wasn't even pulled of well enough, not from a technical nor storywise perspective. It seemed like someone said, hey what's the fastest and cheapest way to end this thing and get the lead to redeem himself. Damn.


Hays Code ending. Many a good film's ending was ruined by it (them).

See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Production_Code

reply

[deleted]

Just saw this on the MOVIES channel, and boy that ending did blow me away---the film and the acting were nothing short of classic,just damn good--- I knew that Kirk Douglas being in it meant it was going to be a good film, and I was proved right. That ending came out of nowhere,almost---it was like--honestly,it was like something you'd see in a 70s flick, not an early 50s film. I was like, "Damn, why did it even have to end like that? I mean, WTF!" Especially after all Douglas's character went through and put others through in the film. I also loved how the acting was much more naturalistic for a film that had stage roots----it didn't look in the least bit stagey,like sometimes some films from that era could be--the cast looked like real people and not Hollywood types at all.

Of course Douglas killed it as the cop, but so did the entire cast---in all fairness, Lee Grant (this was her film debut, I believe) wasn't given much to do after her first initial couple of scenes, and Wiseman (whom I didn't even recognize because he was so young) chewed up the scenery, bu tin a good and interesting way. I also liked he fact that there was a black policeman in the cast---even though he didn't have many lines to say, his presence was still quite an eye-opener for the simple fact that you rarely see black police period in 1950s films. All in all, this was a hell of a film, it turned out to be way more deeper than the standard film noir I was expecting from the title. It's like a forgotten classic,basically---harsh, intense and keeping it real for the eera it was made in---I also was surprised to hear the topic of abortion gone deeply into--- I can't even recall another film from that era in which a married women actually confesses to having an abortion---that was even more tripped out. I really admired and liked the hell out of it. Pretty damn impressive for what it was and for its era,too.

reply

[deleted]