Hepburn is incandescent


I know Bogart has top billing and won his only Oscar for this film (quite how is a puzzle), but I have to say for me that this film's strongest asset is the performance by Katharine Hepburn. She is absolutely luminous in this film. There is something eery about seeing such a huge star be utterly convincing as this repressed missionary type character. Usually you have actors that are chameleons and disappear before our eyes like Meryl and Duvall, or they essentially play themselves over and over again like Mae West or Julia Roberts. But Hepburn does both in a way. You never forget she's Hepburn - and how could you ever! - but you absolutely accept her as this repressed religious spinster. She was truly one of a kind.

reply

I agree thoroughly and well said. She was brilliant.

reply

Hepburn is obviously the more talented actor of the two. Her performance provides an interesting example of superb acting before cinema's focus shifted to realism. On the other hand, I have never seen Bogart give such an inspired performance. Gone is the tough guy who knows all the angles, Bogart's popular onscreen persona. Here is a fool and a drunkard who gradually transforms himself into a capable human being. He's hilarious, relatable, and, in the end, he wins both the audience's and Hepburn's heart.

Hepburn's performance has more depth, but that doesn't mean Bogart didn't deserve his Oscar. Great stuff from both of them.

reply

I love them both, and I love the movie. For me, Charlie isn't a fool: he's a supremely practical individual, who's paramount interests are his work and survival. He sees no further than he has to, and has no clue about what he's capable of. This does not make him a fool, at least not to me: it makes him an under-achiever. Under Rosie's influence, he becomes an inventor, a very good problem solver, a risk-taker, a care-taker, a care-recipient, and a man who finds love with a woman who has shown him he is someone worthwhile, and who can give him as good as he can give. To me, Bogart gives Charlie a wonderful warmth, sense of humor, glimmers of wit and a strong arc of growth both of strength and vulnerability. He plays wonderfully, to me, the delicate parallel between him and the wonderfully-gifted Hepburn, as she grows in an equal opposite direction.

Long ago, I remember Bogart in an interview saying something like: "We loved those two crazy people on that boat". They both made me love them too.

reply

Fair enough. I probably went too far in calling him a fool. For me, he's got some foolish moments, for example, how he waffles back and forth between rage and flattery when Rose is giving him the silent treatment. From my masculine perspective, the scene is humiliating. It's a powerful scene, I do not deny it, but the kind of man Charlie eventually becomes, "an inventor, a very good problem solver, a risk-taker, a care-taker, a care-recipient" and one who is willing to capitulate to his woman, is the kind of man I have yet to become. You can call it what you want, chauvinistic, prideful or egotistical, but I prefer independent. I'm certain there are many strong-willed women who feel the same way in regards to men.

The truth is that there are many men who capitulate to their women, but perhaps such portrayals are rarely caught on film, especially during the 50's. It's obvious to me that Rose is The African Queen. That such an overlooked social dynamic could worm its way into a classic Hollywood movie makes Bogart's humbling performance all the more praiseworthy. It's even fitting that Hepburn's performance should carry more gravitas because hers is the stronger character. I'm all for it. That's what I call gutsy filmmaking.

reply

I'm not a big Hepburn fan, but she turns in a spectacular performance in this film. Loved her here.

reply

IMO, this was the very best performance of her career.
She should also have won the Oscar; she deserved it more for this film than for the four for which she won.

reply

After more than a decade since my last viewing, I saw this again, tonight, at the home of my niece and her husband; we were trying to stream a few movies featuring Ronald Colman and Greer Garson -- but, going into holiday gear (apparently for the Millennial crowd), Netflix has little to offer in the way of older films. But we found THE AFRICAN QUEEN and settled for watching it.

The older I get, the more I appreciate and enjoy the work of both Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn in this; you really almost HAVE to be middle-aged (as I am) in order to grasp all of the nuances in not only in Bogie and Kate's performances, but in the narrative, the atmosphere and the scenic beauty of the African waterways and riverbanks as captured in the brillant color cinematography.

I cannot picture any other leading man and leading lady who could have improved on Bogart's and Miss Hepburn's performances in TAQ; I feel that the two of them were just born to star in this picture together! So, I'm not of the "Bogie vs Hepburn" or "Hepburn vs Bogie" schools of thought, because I think they were both brilliant in this movie.



Secret Message, HERE!--->CONGRATULATIONS!!! You've discovered the Secret Message!

reply