MovieChat Forums > I Love Lucy (1951) Discussion > Why didn't they plan their trip better?

Why didn't they plan their trip better?


They take out driving to California, 3,000 miles away. They do no planning on where they will stop and sleep. In "First Stop", they have no plan whatsoever and end up spending the night in this horrific cabin. It seems like when traveling cross-country that you would do better planning on where your stopping points are. For instance, we will drive to Cincinnatti today and stay in a hotel and then get up tomorrow and drive a little further, etc. Is this how people did things in the 1950s? Did they just strike out without planning anything?

reply

It seems like when traveling cross-country that you would do better planning on where your stopping points are.

It's a sitcom, not real life.

If they did what "normal" people are expected to do, there would be no comedy.

Why is this so difficult for some people to understand ? 

reply

Makes me think of my late parents.
Honestly, they couldn't plan a vacation if their lives depended on it!
In fact, my father's idea of a "vacation" was just getting in the car and driving around aimlessly.

I sure was glad when I grew up and could take trips without them.

reply

Aside from the obvious fact that a well-planned trip would have ruined the three comedic episodes about the foursome's misadventures, I will point out some facts about the differences in a coast-to-coast driving trip in 1955 and today:

With no Interstate highway system, you had to follow the two-lane highways, which made it much more difficult to estimate how far you could travel in a given day. Driving from A to B might take an hour longer for person A than B if A mistimed things and hit the big city rush hour while passing through town. And those highways did PASS THROUGH the cities, they didn't move around them like the three-digit interstates of today.

I can remember trips where we'd drive, where the speed limit was 65, for 40 minutes or more at 35-40 MPH because of a slow-moving vehicle in front--maybe 30 cars in front of us--in areas where there was no way to pass because of oncoming traffic and too-many curves in the road.

Instead of stopping at a drive through for a meal to eat while driving, delaying you by, maybe 5 minutes, people stopped at actual restaurants where today's lunch might only take 40 minutes from receiving the menu until completing the meal, but tomorrow, due to slower service, might take an hour and 15 minutes. Again, the point is estimating how long things will take was harder.

And as for road construction holding things up--it's been years since we were the ones to carry the flag as the last car going through when construction limited things to one lane for a few miles and that was the way to let the people at the other end know the last car had gone through. My dad used to joke about how we should hide the flag and really mess them up, but of course, we never did.

Also, few vacation travelers would be making motel reservations for a cross-country trip because that would require--assuming you could correctly guess how far you could travel--making an expensive long-distance call, and making it to a motel you never heard of and had no idea if it was a nice place or not. It would not be easy to know which hotel/motel who's number to ask for from the operator.

Most hotels and motels were independent, one-location places and people would commonly ask for a key and a chance to inspect the room before booking the place. Sight unseen, the heroes of our series might well have booked a room at a place as bad as that place in Ohio that was depicted on the series.

Not knowing how far you will be able to travel makes it tough to book rooms in advance, especially more than a day away.

I think the typical foursome driving a long distance in 1955 would have driven as far as they felt like--given the many variables--each day and looked for a nice motel/hotel each evening, much as the Ricardos and Mertzes did.

What they wouldn't have likely done, is gone from Ohio to Tennessee. They would have been far more likely to continue west and pick up Route 66 somewhere near Chicago. Now that would have taken them through Albuquerque: It's just the Tennessee part that seemed like the long way to go, time-wise. The roads go through more mountains and frequently are heading southeasterly. But then they couldn't have run into their old friend Tennessee Ernie.


Overall, their travel provided some really funny moments, particularly the first one set in Ohio. I always wished they had taken a couple of more episodes, maybe stopping to see Niagara Falls, the Grand Canyon or Mt. Rushmore, or something and having other troubles.






Why don't we just shoot 'em down and be through with it?

reply

It's not about it being the 1950's. People had brains then. If Lucy did not get lost or whatever, there would be no plot.

reply

wouldn't have been very funny if they had planned everything. people in sitcoms aren't supposed to be sensible.

reply

Lucy planned their route. Remember the map? http://carbtripper.blogspot.com/2011/03/i-love-trucky.html (3rd pic down)

reply

Thank you, FlushingCaps!! You pointed out many things that I had not thought of. We are so used to our modern world that we forget how it was in the 1950s. You are right. Booking a hotel back then in a different city would have meant a long-distance call, which would have cost lots of money. Back then, there was no internet to look up the hotel and see if it was nice or not. And, there weren't as many hotel chains so people couldn't judge if a certain hotel was good or not. You are also right about meals taking longer. And, I had forgotten all about that there was no interstate highway system back then. This is exactly the kind of response I was hoping for! A well-thought-out, logical explanation as to why they traveled the way they did. I totally understand that the main reasons lie in the fact that it was a sitcom, and if things were perfect then they wouldn't be funny. However, sometimes I like to talk about what logical people would have done, and travel in the 1950s was obviously way different than today. We are too spoiled to 2016 amenities (such as being able to talk on here and discuss such things!!).

reply

And thank you jack...for the nice compliment. I too enjoy thinking about show plots from a logical perspective--except for the shows that are supposed to be silly, such as Green Acres, where you really have to leave logic on the doorstep to enjoy them.

Sometimes shows that normally feature normal people behaving logically will stray far from their usual behavior that it interferes with my ability to enjoy the show. There was a Donna Reed episode I caught on ME TV a year or so ago that had Mary behaving so illogically that I couldn't enjoy it at all. Nothing she was doing made any sense. As I recall, she was phoning her dad about what anyone would regard as a minor problem--she had misplaced her house key, only she spoke in such a panicky way that poor Alex had reason to worry that she was in the emergency room at the hospital or some other serious catastrophe. She kept on dancing around the subject and wouldn't get around to telling him what really happened.


One reason I was able to think about the traveling times in my reply was that I love to get off the interstate when I have some time on trips and drive those two-lane highways. Now I make detailed plans for my days on the road, principally because there is often a minor league ballgame that evening and I don't want to fall too far behind in my plans--such as taking an extra two hours to tour a museum--and miss my game. I learned years ago that my estimations of how long to get from A to B are very accurate when taking the interstates, but the other roads usually take me longer than I figure. It's the stop-and-go-driving in the cities, along with the lower speed limits, stopping for train crossings, etc, and not accurately figuring how many miles the speed limit will be lower. So I learned to better adjust for those sorts of things and my wife and I are where we want to be when we thought we'd be there far more often than before.









Why don't we just shoot 'em down and be through with it?

reply

yes even back then small towns had nice hotels and motels.

reply

Well that may have required Ricki paying for several long distance phone calls !

reply

[deleted]

I think how hungry they must have been after nothing but that stale cheese sandwich ! That of course was all on Ricky because he wouldn't stop. I agree though is were the comedy comes in.

Well planned trips are not foolproof . I always enjoyed it when they travelled .

reply

The First Stop episode is by far my favorite, it's a damn shame it's not on hulu.

reply