Yes, she should have run faster and gotten away, she deserved to be raped!
(This is basically what you're implying, even though I'm sure you don't mean to.)
The rapist was going to rape her - period. It was a nicely shot scene, even if WE feel she should have tried harder, you know, to not get raped. (He might have tried not to rape her, of course, but that's another issue.)
Her behavior is typical for female characters in the 1940s-50s. Weak, falling, docile. Director Lupino was sticking with the warped gender definitions of the time. Too bad you didn't finish the film. If you watch it in context, meaning, knowing it was only the second film EVER to deal with rape, and it was made in 1950, you might have appreciated its progressiveness. Still, it's not perfect by any means.
reply
share