How would Guinness have done in the lead?
Whisky Galore is one of my favourite films, and I always wonder what would have happened if Guinness has taken the lead, or a part.
You're lucky the bar's open to you.
Whisky Galore is one of my favourite films, and I always wonder what would have happened if Guinness has taken the lead, or a part.
You're lucky the bar's open to you.
Well first they'd have had to change the title to Ale Galore... But seriously, I think it would have been a mistake. A star of Guinness's stature would have overwhelmed the rest of the picture. We'd always be distracted by his presence. With the exception of James R. Justice and Gordon Jackson, the rest of the cast is cheerfully anonymous and this adds to the movie's charm.
shareI doubt he would have been an improvement over Basil Radford, since Radford's the closest to the lead here, even if he plays the bad guy and comic foil. We have Guinness in a classic stick-in-the-mud performance anyway as Col. Nicholson in "Bridge Over The River Kwai." Radford comes across as light enough; I wonder if Guinness would have given his character such gravity as to make the film less enjoyable.
sharewould have been great to see him in thisWhen there's no more room in hell, The dead will walk the earth...
What lead would that be?
I'm not sure this film has a lead in the usual since.
Waggett stands out, but I can't consider him a leading character.
This film is an example of a good balanced ensemble.
Well, this is a six-year-old thread, but I just saw the movie again and still chuckle. Don't mean to be pedantic, but the "lead" seems to be the "tight little island." I suppose the part for Guinness would have been the mousy school teacher, but I think Gordon Jackson filled the bill quite effectively.
While we're dream casting, and although he was still in knee breeches in '49, Peter Sellers, in his "I'm All Right, Jack" character, would have been super in the Basil Radford spot.