MovieChat Forums > The Set-Up (1949) Discussion > Remake of The Set-Up in the works

Remake of The Set-Up in the works


I didn't see any mention elsewhere on the IMDB page but I just found that there's a remake of The Set-Up under development, with Benjamin Bratt, James Gandolfini, and Halle Berry. More at:

http://www.zap2it.com/movies/news/story/0,1259,---13791,00.html

and there is indeed an IMDB entry for the new movie (though not much updated info yet):

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0332756/

I do wonder if any remake can recapture the original. It was so much more than just the boxing story. Can they/will they try to recall the noir feel, the time-capsule of gritty post-war America (like the "bad dream" scene of Pottersville in "It's a Wonderful Life")? Without that, it might otherwise seem a mere follow-on to Million Dollar Baby.

reply

Sigh! In my movie universe this is one of the top films of all time. It is a perfect work of art and not something that deserves to be tampered with. A re-make implies The Set-Up can be improved upon. It can't!



You can lead a horse to water, but a pencil must be lead.

reply

I would disagree. Though this film is brilliant it had a lot of potential left. I doubt the remake will be better though.

Somebody here has been drinking and I'm sad to say it ain't me - Allan Francis Doyle

reply

There is NO way this film can be remade. I dont care WHO they get to act in it.

reply

As of "... improvement can be made" - no, no, the only reason they do all those awful remakes is that MONEY can be made, and it's easier to get an existing script and formula that has worked before than invent something new - that's all.
Every now and again they do a remake of some obscure crap from the past - now there's a potential! Happens too seldom, though.


Saigon... s**t! I'm still only in Saigon...

reply

There's pro's and cons of doing this again. One thing is for sure, they won't make it any better. This is a very good film, I won't say it's my favorite or one of the best made but it realises the story perfectly and is as good as this story can posibly be. So that leaves the remakes with two angles. Either they will change it and essentially make another film which makes little sense with films from so long ago that are barely remembered (sadly) by the modern movie goer because it won't really draw extra punters like remaking (however badly) something like Alfie or the Texas Chainsaw Massacre did. The other option is to simply try and make a film as good as the origional but by doing it with modern actors, set in the modern day and in colour it get's it across to a whole new audience. That is what I am hoping they are doing and I don't think this is entirely bad.

The problem is it will be hard to match the origional and if Halle Berrys previous films are anything to go by (*ahem* catwoman *ahem*) they will struggle to even make it remotely good. Finally even if it does match up, it's not going to really appeal to any of it's current fans because we know in advance it's not going to improve apon the origional.

Still I don't object to getting this to a new audience. Even if it's mostly people that hate old films like this because they are black and white and everyone wears suits. Perhaps it will show them that regardless of whatever they feel about that, there were some great ideas around back then.

Anyway it won't make my DVD collection I can say that for sure.

reply

im not surpised if its gettin remade. its a classic, with good acting, good cinematography, and a great boxing sequence. perfect "set up" for a remake

reply

Moron

reply

Perhaps the new version intends to be more faithful to the original narrative poem by March. I still don't believe it's a good idea to remake this film, and it can't have the impact March's story would have had if it had been made about a black boxer as the writer intended. It might have influenced some people at that time to rethink racial stereotypes--to remake it now and emphasize this aspect is too little, too late.

reply

A re-make of this? Why? It's perfect. All the small roles of the fight crowd, "Little Boy's" cold menace, Robert Ryan's well realized character and the amazing look and feel of the film, sheer perfection.

Oh, and Audrey Totter's sultry "hotness!" "A dollar sixteen? You should give a floor show."

Gotta love a woman like that.

A remake? They'll blow it by overdoing it.

reply

Could anyone help me pinpoint the name of the actress who was sitting next to the character “Little Boy” Jo and Gambling with the man in front of her?

I hate Hollywood. Rarely does a good comedy come along anymore, all horror movies are remakes Or based off true events, Action films come out looking childish and goofy. And No One cares except for the viewers.

reply

I believe the character's name was Bunny, played by actress Lynn Millan.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0587627/

reply

[deleted]

Ordinarily I would be, but at its heart The Set-Up is a simple enough story that if they set it in the present and did't just ape the classic it might turn out alright. In some ways the story is actually more apropriate for the boxing world of 2006 than of 1949.

reply



Once again, Hollywood can´t think of ANYTHING original to put on screen, so let´s make an iferior remake to a absolute classic. Robert wise´s classic is a terrific film, shot in real time.A film to be redescovered(If you havent purchased The Box Set FilmNior 1, you are missing OUT!) Robert Ryan is superb. Should be studied by budding directors to show how a story unfolds in 80 real minutes. Hollywood is run by JERKOVS!!!

reply

[deleted]