MovieChat Forums > The Passionate Friends (1949) Discussion > Companion Piece to BRIEF ENCOUNTER

Companion Piece to BRIEF ENCOUNTER


Saw this for the first time today - certainly quite a tribute to Ann Todd's beauty! (Well, she was Mrs. Lean, or just about to be Mrs. Lean, around this time.)

I found it to be a nice companion piece to Lean's earlier BRIEF ENCOUNTER - it even had Trevor Howard. The scenes in Switzerland were beautifully photographed - there was some matte work mixed in but it was extremely well-done. There are other similarities to the earlier film, such as the train station, narration by the female lead and, of course, the situation between the lovers (or near-lovers).

Claude Rains is quite brilliant here, demonstrating the force and presence which often made one forget there were other actors in a scene - dressed in a cloak in his first scene, he looks almost exactly as he looked in PHANTOM OF THE OPERA six years earlier! And in how many films does Rains get the giri at the end as he does here?

"Remind me to tell you about the time I looked into the heart of an artichoke."

reply

Quite a beautiful film. Howard and Rains are terrific, always solid performers. I like Brief Encounter a little better, but this one is very nice, if a bit too long to my taste. I grew up knowing Lean as the epic film-maker, but he sure did some nice work in the '40s.

reply

Oh I wish I could say it was a great companion piece to Brief Encounter - from the trailer and what I read about it before hand it sounded perfect match - and some of the elements were quite similar as mentioned by the first poster, but I was actually a little disappointed with this film - perhaps from thinking of this comparison (as Brief Encounter is pretty much my favourite film of all time - so any film would be hard to match it).

Everyone was excellent in the film, and it looked wonderful - but I don't know, it just wasn't as romantic as I hoped it would be, at least I wasn't feeling it - and I was rather annoyed with some of the editing - ie almost every time the lovely Trevor Howard went to kiss her - they cut away after about half a second! just let the moment linger for goodness sake!

I liked the film, but from the gorgeous trailer i was truelly expecting to love the film, so I guess that's what disappointed me. So it is kind of a good companion film story and production-wise, but quality-wise, not so much.

Here's a link to the trailer I saw - notice how in the trailer they slow down the kisses - THAT's how it should have been - embrace the moment!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGj5ggh47ps&playnext_from=TL&videos=dMwVbSgkfq4

Do you have monkeys in Scotland?
~No, but if we did we'd probably deep fry them!

reply

I definitely enjoyed this as a sort of counter-point to Brief Encounter. Claude Rains is brilliant; Trevor Howard plays a fairly humdrum role well. I found Ann Todd's performance a little uneven, though. She alternated between stammering awkardness and closed-off coldness - but managed to be consistently boring. There's a difference between glacial remoteness and stilted coldness, and she manages stilted coldness everytime. It was difficult to understand why either man wanted the colourless creature.

I found the 'reveal' ending particularly satisfying, too. It was fun to look back and see all the little hints dropped throughout the film to let us know the true state of play.

Howard finally realises he loves his wife - although this is signalled to the viewer much earlier when we see his pain at her first betrayal. He only loses his self-control three times in the whole film: when he throws Stephen out and slams the door after uncovering the first affair, when he finds out about the second 'affair' and issues the divorce papers, and when his wife mentions Stephen's name in their confrontation in the penultimate scene.

Mary finally realises she loves her husband. Again, the viewer can see in hindsight that this has always been the case. All Mary's recollections of her relationship with Stephen have an air of fantasy about them, as one reviewer said, they're more teenage daydreams than anything else. When she actually has the chance to leave Howard for Stephen during their first dalliance, to make their relationship a reality, she backs out. So much for her grand passion. Mary and Howard's interactions are notable for their lack of chemistry.

In fact, you could suggest that Mary's obsession with Stephen really serves another psychological purpose for her. We are told early on that she is afraid to 'belong' to someone else, and afraid to love. What better way to hide from her growing feelings for her husband than by fostering the idea of this lost 'true love', allowing her to remain emotionally unavailable her husband. As mentioned above, we see what a sham this 'true love' actually is when she fails to follow through on it.

The last few scenes underline this. Mary is able to draw the line under her fantasy relationship with Stephen, and walks away from him with relative equanimity. However, when her husband confronts her with how she has treated him, and finally rejects her, *this* is when she finally breaks and comtemplates ending it all.

reply

Well said, @losingmypatience!

Just watched this on TCM. When I was younger I thought this was a deeply romantic film and couldn't understand why Mary ended up with Howard. Now, I agree, that this is a counterpoint to the romantic Brief Encounter, an anti-romantic film, if you like. I never appreciated the deep psychological underpinnings before.

I won't go as far as to say I understand what was going on in Mary's head, what her motivations were, because the information isn't there. We can only guess. She was a remote and unlikable creature and the actress gives little away. It's a shame really. As I think about it, it reminds me of the repressed character Judy Davis played in A Passage to India, who had a fanciful naivete about her.

This was absolutely a brilliant film, if you pay attention. Also reminds me of Douglas Sirk's films, in that the opulent, perfectly rendered surface diverts one from the human dynamics and at the same time, exposes/elevates them. Just brilliant.

Now I want to buy this film, but of course, it's not available for Region 1. Figures.

reply

I Think she did love the husbands type of love [mature,seasoned,and gives her space] You do know they have to make love at some point.

reply