MovieChat Forums > Orphée (1950) Discussion > cocteu is asurrealist or not?

cocteu is asurrealist or not?


jean cocteu said that he is not a surrealist but i think he was very impressed
of surreal art and impress the surrealist as a avant_garde .
what do think?

reply

Cocteau was a storyteller. Thrusting the tale of Orpheus into (relatively) modern times is an interesting storytelling angle, but doesn't make the style of the movie surrealist. The images of persons moving into and through mirrors was simply an element that allowed mortal characters to enter and leave the underworld.

reply

cocteau was an existentialist. his works can be very closely connected with other writers of his era such as Samuel Beckett, Eugene Ionesco and Harold Pinter. I love this film. I look forward to seeing the other ones.

reply

he tried to incorporate fatastic elements in his movies. he was not a surrealist like bunuel but he was definitely inspired by him. like "le sang d' un poete" with " Un chien andalou" or the mirror scene with the beauty loking to the beast in a mirror in "la belle et la bete" and the one in the bunuelian film with the young women just looking to a mirror in "l' age d'or". great mirror scenes in this one too.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Cocteau was generally hated by the surrealists. I studied this film in a module called French Film and Fantasy.

reply

Breton was a total control freak, and very jealous of anyone he saw as a rival, such as Tristan Tzara, or, indeed, Cocteau. The fact that he was hated by the surrealists doesn't mean that he wasn't a surrealist, in the sense of "pure psychic automatism". The radio broadcasts in Orphee are clearly surreal, and throughout the influence of surrealism/Freud hangs heavy. Truly great film though!

reply

Dali loved Cocteau and they hung together often. Dali said Cocteau used his, Dali's own method of "Critcal Paranoia" when fashioning his films. Remember the hydocephalic in the act of milking his cranial harp is without compare.

Nothing exists more beautifully than nothing.

reply

I think it is very hard to say what is 'surreal' when it comes to cinema. It confuses me aynyway, I don't quite understand what it means to say this film is surreal or that film is surreal. The edges just seem too woolly, for example Orphee has been described as surreal and not, and I can see arguments for both. For me, Un Chien Andalou seems more 'surreal' than L'Age d'Or, but who is to say that L'age d'Or is not a surreal film?

reply

in many ways Cocteau was the antithesis of a surrealist. he told traditionally structured stories and borrowed from classical literature for both subject and form. in some respects he was an establishment figure, the paradigm of a bohemian and aesthete . it's an easy trap to fall into, labelling anything that's out of the ordinary from the first half of the 20th c. as being 'surreal', a lazy, misused catch all.

reply

peter, I completely agree - about the term being misused.

reply

Was he a surealist? Someone has already mensioned his assosations with a certain Spanish artist but was he a surealist?

In 'the testement of Orphee' he represents a series of dream images set during the time between the expolsion of a chimney set for demolition and it's fall but a surealist?

A recent artical in fortean Times peged him not a surealist but as an Alchamest. It argued that he used alchamic and magical theory to change people's perceptions and to therefore chasnge the political climate. Perhaps we should ask if he was a magision.

reply

The term surrealism has become totally subjective. Somewhere (around the time of Bunuel) it branched off from its Oxford Dictionary definition and became a term that described a movement. In cinema, the Surrealist movement (note the capital letter 'S') was commandeered by the likes of Bunuel, but we must remind ourselves that Bunuel was only one interpretation of surrealism (lowercase 's').

Going back to the dictionary definition, surrealism is "the principles, ideals, or practice of producing fantastic or incongruous imagery." Note the word "imagery". It doesn't necessarily apply to bizarre, nonsensical plot twists (like Chien Andalou or Age d'Or). Surrealism should be recognized as a visual style foremost.

With that said, I don't think anyone (Cocteau included) will deny that the imagery in this movie is utterly out of this world: the photonegative car ride to Death's house, the reverse-action shots of people rising from the dead, and that phantasmagoric scene of climbing the walls en route to Hades. That's how I (and the dictionary) define surrealism. In that respect, Tim Burton is a surrealist; Jean-Pierre Jeunet is a surrealist; and yes, even the movie The Crow is a great surrealist work.

As others have pointed out, the plot of Orphée is highly structured and logical, unlike the work of Bunuel which seems at times purely random. But I don't think an acid-trip plot is a requirement. It just happened to be popular amongst the Surrealists. I can see how they would hate Cocteau for going against the grain (which he did brilliantly). Maybe the theme of Orphee's ostracism from the Cafe des Poets is Cocteau's depiction of how he himself was not accepted by the "hip crowd".

reply

Have you read the Surrealist Manifesto by Andre Breton? It's a bit more than the dictionary definition!*

I also don't think you can say Bunuel 'commandeered' surrealism in cinema, as he and Dali started it!

Cocteau spoke of filming poetry. Not easy to fully understand, but he was not part of the formal surrealistic movement.

(* and I don't pretend to fully understand it! It can be read on the web)

reply

I also don't think you can say Bunuel 'commandeered' surrealism in cinema, as he and Dali started it!

No, that's my whole point: Bunuel & Dali definitely did NOT start Surrealism! They just took over & claimed it as their own. But watch Metropolis by Fritz Lang (1927... three years before Bunuel's debut) or, hell, check out Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari from 1920 when Dali was only 15 years old. I think it's terribly tragic when people attribute Surrealism to Dali & Bunuel, overlooking the amazing works of those who came earlier.

The Surrealist Manifesto by Breton was written in 1924, again years after what I consider to be the the beginnings of surrealism in Germany. So I'm reluctant to accept Breton's word as law.

This whole situation reminds me of "new jazz" (exemplified by some slick dressed dude with shades and a saxophone) which totally stomps all over the original jazz of Louis Armstrong, Billie Holiday and the other pioneers. In the case of jazz, as in the case of surrealism, I remain a purist. The newer stuff is just one facet of a broader whole.

This means that I consider Cocteau to be a surrealist even though he's nothing like Bunuel. I also consider Terry Gilliam to be a surrealist. No one has exclusive rights to the word--except of course the dictionary!

reply

I meant that Bunuel and Dali were generally considered to have made the first surrealist film (even if they didn't), not to have started surrealism!

I agree with most of what you say. It just irritates me a little when people use the word 'surreal' to describe anything that's not conventional or literal :)

(By the way, I totally agree with your sentiments in your Bottom 13 film list)

reply

I meant that Bunuel and Dali were generally considered to have made the first surrealist film (even if they didn't), not to have started surrealism!


Ah, I see your point. You're right, they were the first ones (that I know of) to say "this is a surrealist film", so I guess they set the tone for the whole movement. I guess the whole confusion comes from the word "surreal" which, like you said, is commonly used to describe just about anything, whereas "surrealism" is a very specific class.

Meh, as if I know anything about film anyway. I'm still trying to figure out what "new wave" means :)

I'm glad you like my bottom 13 list! It's a shame because a lot of those films are critically acclaimed, and I'd love to see them. But not if it's going to ruin my lunch.

reply

This is a bit off topic for this thread, but I totally agree with you about cruelty in films.

I saw Caché at the cinema, without knowing what was in it. Apart from that one scene, it's a really intriguing film, although overrated I think. It did strike me as strange that most of the comments about the film being shocking related to a fake (human) death - which was brilliantly done, but obviously not real.

Luckily, I read an online review of Oldboy the day I got the DVD, so was able to jump past the scene in question. One thing I thought was curious was that the main actor repeatedly refused to do the scene at first, as he is a Buddhist and said it was against his religion to hurt any living thing. But the director finally pursuaded him ... "I can't do that, it's against my beliefs" "But it's necessary for the plot" "Er, okay then"!

reply

"I can't do that, it's against my beliefs" "But it's necessary for the plot" "Er, okay then"!


lol!

That struck me as very odd, too. I read that he prayed for each animal after each take (a total of 4 were killed because they kept screwing up the shot). I wonder what his prayers were like...

(take 1) "Great Buddha please forgive me for the animal I just killed"
(take 2) "Great Buddha please forgive me again"
(take 3) "Great Buddha whadaya say, one more time"
(take 4) "Great Buddha maybe now would be a good time for me to tell you I've converted to paganism"

:D

reply

Funny.

reply

Cocteau could spell better than the OP, but always enjoyed watching crippled spastics dance. We should enjoy it as well.

Nothing is more beautiful than nothing.

reply

I don't care what education you people received and I don't give two craps about what Breton had to say, "Blood of a Poet" is a surrealist film, no ifs ands or buts. Save any kind of reasoning, there is none. So yes, Cocteau was a surrealist, among many other things. Actually, I change my mind, I challenge anyone to make an argument that "Blood of a Poet" was not a surrealist film.

reply

It's as simple as this IMO, art doesn't have to be part of the surrealist "movement" in order to be surreal.

The surreal existed long before the movement.

reply

That's all fine and dandy, and I agree, but "Blood of a Poet", the movie itself, is a surrealist piece in the true sense of the word, whatever that means :P

I just get annoyed at know-it-alls who think they know everything about everything.

reply

It is because it's surreal in nature but not because it's part of the movement.

I'm with you though. I for one am not concerned with the movement and I am drawn to surrealism because of it's tone and mood not because of the "point" the "surrealists" were trying to make. For them the art was simply a secondary artifact of their movement and not the priority and I do not agree with that at all.

reply

I agree with you 100%
I'm glad there are clear thinkers like pushnlacs on these boards. I'm so used to the imbeciles that infest these topics.

reply

jean cocteu said that he is not a surrealist...


Reminds me of the scene in Life of Brian: "Only the real messiah (a real surrealist) would deny his divinity (surrealism)".

"Sometimes you have to take the bull by the tail, and face the truth" - G. Marx

reply

He said "Blood of a Poet" wasn't surrealist because in his opinion it came before surrealism. Whether or not he was right, he was still essentially part of that movement whether he influenced, preceded, or even drew from it.

-------
Le Mepris

reply

[deleted]

Andre Breton picked up a neologism by Apollinaire and gave meaning to it, and in the process created a new artistic movement, which he controlled with an iron fist. He didn't like Cocteau and indeed expelled many people from the movement whom we today consider surrealists, like Salvador Dalí. Since surrealism is such a complicated thing to define, I take a simple approach to it: surrealists are only people Breton considered surrealists.

This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel.

reply

Don't know about Cocteau in general, but Orpheus (as well as Beauty And The Beast) seem to be usually classified as "fantasy" and I guess it's just as well - even though both have elements that, I think, should qualify as surreal. Either way it's difficult to tell when "fantasy" crosses over to "surrealism".



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply