Looks like we were spending our time doing the exact same thing that Sunday evening, February 9th, 1964 (along with how many millions ?).
"I thought their hair was so outrageous. Now it isn't even long!"
I've heard that same comment about their hair time and time again over the years and have thought about it plenty of times myself. Three things come to mind:
'Crew cuts' haircut for boys were 'in' back then - for me, my bros and friends, at least every spring/summer we got the 'buzz cuts'. Remember the 'Beatle wigs' ? The comedians/comedy TV shows of the day used the wigs for laughs - these wigs of course were an exaggerated replication of the Beatle haircut. But back then, there was no 'internet'so we really didn't see their image as much as one would see it if it all (Beatle-mania) was going down today. Between the adults complaining how outrageous their hair was, the exaggerated wigs we saw on everything from the Beverly Hillbillies to Milton Berle comedy show, I think the image of them in our minds eye (not to mention our very young minds dealing with this phenomena/sensation) all combined into an amalgam of not really accurate imagery of what they truly looked like - more a half gossip exaggeration and half 'an eye witness actually makes a poor witness' kinda thing. Make any sense ? LOL !!
Yes, their images were all over everything from lunch boxes to bubble gum cards to school book covers but unless you were a collector of all things 'Beatle' or your parents indulged your every whim, most kids saw these images in passing. One last thing:
They didn't use 'Vitalis' or pomade etc to get that 'Elvis' or the 'DA' look that also was 'in' at the time so yeah, theirs was a very different 'look'.
Rambling thoughts while waiting for a phone call from a friend ...
reply
share