MovieChat Forums > Miracle on 34th Street (1947) Discussion > Would the Original Casting Have Made The...

Would the Original Casting Have Made The Film Even More Beloved?


Not many people know this, but Darryl F. Zanuck, studio head of Twentieth Century Fox, wanted John Wayne to play the part of Fred Gailey in the classic holiday film Miracle on 34th Street . Perhaps he was anticipating the five films that the Duke and Maureen O’Hara would end up making together (starting three years later), or perhaps Mr. Zanuck just liked the idea of John Wayne, fresh off of numerous war films, playing the idealistic young lawyer who risks his career to defend a ‘nice old man with whiskers’ who believes himself to be Santa Claus.

Fate, and sloppy penmanship, took their toll, though. When Mr. Zanuck scribbled down his ideas for casting to the director of Miracle on 34th Street, George Seaton, Seaton thought that he had written John Payne. Seaton, not surprisingly, was a big fan of Payne’s, delighting in his work in films such as The Dolly Sisters and Footlight Serenade and swooped in to get him before someone else did.

By the time Mr. Zanuck discovered what had happened, it was too late to make the changes. Wardrobe had been ordered and John Wayne could simply not fit into the clothes tailored for the more slender John Payne. Rumor has it that the Duke also objected to wearing an apron in the one scene in which it was called for.

While it’s nice that the film gave John Payne his greatest claim to screen immortality, one does wonder what John Wayne would have done with the role. Alas, it was not to be.





What kind of a man is Captain Renault?
Oh, he's just like any other man, only more so.

reply

I don't think it would have made it better. I was never a fan of Wayne, and think John Payne suited the role perfectly. Can't imagine anyone else but him as Fred Gailey.





AVADA KEDAVRA!!!

reply

My thoughts exactly. Can't imagine Wayne in that role. Payne was perfect for it. However, if Payne had never existed, what would you think about Van Johnson in the role?

reply

I think if Payne never existed, Zanuck would have probably cast Fox star Tyrone Power as Gaily.

reply

Power might not have been a bad choice, but I'd still favor Johnson in the role. Power did very little in the way of comedy during his career, so that's why I'd favor Johnson over him. Johnson was a decent actor, but Power...well, Power was aces. What acting chops. I hope you've seen him in ' Nightmare Alley '. In the end, I'm glad that Payne got the role. He was pretty much perfect for it. Don't know if you know it or not, but Miracle is playing today and Wednesday on the big screen in certain parts of the country. Although I own it and have probably seen it twenty times, I've never seen it on the big screen, so I think I'm going to try and catch one of the Wednesday showings. As far as I'm concerned, it's the best Christmas production ever.

reply

I find that kind of hard to believe. Wouldn't it be in the ' trivia ' section for this film if there was any truth to it? Do you have a link to where you read it?

reply

Disclaimer: I'm not a fan of John Wayne. The only film I liked Wayne in was The Quiet Man (one of my favorite films of all time), but I think Wayne would have done a wonderful job in this. Would he have been better than Payne? I don't think so as John Payne did a very nice job. Still, it would be interesting to have an alternative universe app on my ipad to let me see this film with John Wayne in it.




Is very bad to steal Jobu's rum. Is very bad.

reply

In the original script, written for Wayne, Fred and Kris angrily confront Sawyer (played by Ward Bond) in a 42nd Street tavern after they learn of his mistreatment of Alfred. An extended bar fight ensues. The scene was deleted from
the script when Payne was signed on.


I'm not crying, you fool, I'm laughing!

Hewwo.

reply

I like The Duke, but I don't know if he had enough of that "likable everyman" quality Payne brought to the role.

reply

As much as I like Wayne and am a fan of The Quiet Man, he would have been over his head in this film.

Yes, he would have ruined it.

John Payne was perfect. The entire cast is.

Which is why every time they try to remake this film, it falls short of the original.

reply

Those who think Wayne would have been the wrong choice are wrong, and I can prove it. Wayne had wonderful chemistry with Sherry Jackson in "Trouble Along The Way" and with Lee Aaker in "Hondo". Wayne was never afraid of being upstaged by anyone, let alone a child. He frequently sought other more charismatic actors (like Kirk Douglas or Ward Bond) as co stars, even actors taller than he was. He was very generous about letting others actors have their scenes.

There's no reason to think, given either John Wayne's or John Payne's cinematic resume, that one would have been better than the other.

John Wayne had great chemistry with Natalie Wood in "The Searchers", and with Maureen O'Hara in several movies.

Those who don't like John Wayne have allowed Wayne's politics to cloud their opinion of Wayne the actor.

By the way, I think John Payne did a good job, but let's face it, the role didn't require heavy lifting. Many other young actors like William Holden or Glenn Ford would have been equally good. The part doesn't have as big an arc as the part played by Maureen O'Hara.

I think Wayne was a far bigger star than John Payne by 1947 and casting him would have busted the budget. By 1947, Wayne was producing his own movies.

reply

PoliticallyIncorrectone is totally right about John Wayne. Also, if there's any truth to Wayne being cast originally, I don't think it fell through because the costumes had already been done for Payne. It was only a couple of suits and some pajamas.

reply

This doesn't ring true. John Payne was a 20th Century Fox contract player and the role of Fred Gayley is subordinate to the Edmund Gwenn, Maureen O'Hara, and Natalie Wood roles. John Wayne was too big a star for a role that any Fox contract player could have been cast in. That's not to diminish the wonderful job John Payne did with the role.

reply

Smells extremely fishy to me. Unless the OP wants to return and cite their source, I'm most inclined to dismiss it as a tall story, possibly even one of the OP's own invention.

Brenton Film: The past, present and future of silent film
http://www.brentonfilm.com/

reply

I Googled "John Wayne Miracle on 34th Street" and found nothing but Maureen O'Hara obits. A check at notstarring.com also came up empty. I think the OP's just telling stories.

reply