MovieChat Forums > Forever Amber (1948) Discussion > I Would LOVE To See a Remake.

I Would LOVE To See a Remake.


This is a really forgotten film, it has disappeared off the radar and is never shown (though I understand it's only so-so). It's one of my favorite books of all time and I would love to see it remade, starring Scarlett Johansen and ...Johnny Depp? OK, they're Americans, need some English people - who would be good in this? Kate Winslet and.....?.... I understand it might be too expensive to make in these sad times and take valuable screen time away from nerds-scoring-hot- chicks. But it would make a great mini-series on HBO.

reply

I agree. I've long thought a remake of this would be great.

reply

I would also love to see a remake of this movie.Only this time around I want to see Amber as ruthless and cunning as she was in the book.Physically,Linda Darnell was perfect but IMO,she played the role with almost no character at all.

reply

Sophia Myles would be a perfect Amber in a remake.

reply

Actually, I thought all the actors did terrific jobs. I love Linda Darnell's version. However, it is a shame to let a story like this fade into oblivion and I think a remake would be the way to keep it from doing so. I wouldn't want to see Scarlett J. as Amber. I think we need a really exceptional actress for this. Sophia is one I love. I have never seen her in much except Moonlight and, I believe it was TRistan and Isolde.

reply

No offense, but I think Kate is a tad too old now. Amber was 16 at the beginning of the book and barely in her late 20's by book's end as I recall. Plus, while Kate is lovely, she just doesn't come across as quite the beauty Amber was to have been. Not to say she couldn't act the part, she certainly has the chops. Just the wrong age and physical type, imo.

reply

[deleted]

Of all the actresses in the world, Raquel Welch obtained the rights to the novel and planned to film it years ago! The fact that the deal fell through proves there is a merciful God. Personally I think it would be a fun mini-series
with English actors.

reply

It is definitely time to remake this movie. It is a wonderful book and the first movie did not do it justice.

reply

Hi Sylvie17,

So true. I normally don't like remakes but they made such a hash of the first one. Now that the Production Code is no more and there is a flock of young actresses who can do an English accent, now would be the perfect time.

reply

Who would you cast in a remake?

reply

If you stick to English actors there are a lot of possibilities. Rachchel Hurd Wood, Emma Watson or my favorite Carey Mulligan. Though Carey isn't a conventional beauty, she has an impish sexuality. There are a lot of hot young Brits who could play Bruce or King Charles - Ben Barnes, Dominick Cooper, Robert Pattison, Andrew Garfield, Jim Sturgess, Ed Westwick, the list is endless as long as they stick to English actors

reply

[deleted]

Hi lemons31,

Either one would be great.

reply

[deleted]

Hi lemons31,

Billie Piper might be good but of course, there are so many fabulous young British actors working today, who knows?

reply

[deleted]

Hi lemons31,

HBO.

reply

Lovely Raquel probably thought that Golden Globe for best comedic role by an Actress that they gave her for her rather good romantic lead performance as Constance Bonacieux in The Three/Four Musketeers (it was filmed all at once, then released as two separate features in 1974 and 1975) meant that Hollywood finally respected her as a genuine dramatic talent instead of a sexpot.

She won the award, and deserved it, but she had no business playing Amber St. Clare in a remake of this classic 1948 blockbuster. However, she was/is, like Linda Darnell before her, half-Latina, and always considered to be more of a sex symbol than a great actress. Maybe Welch wanted her daughter to play the part at some point, because after she sued MGM for canning her (no pun intended) from Cannery Row in 1980, her movie career was dead in the water. She was also almost forty at the time and would have been too long in the tooth.

Forever Amber, like The Three Musketeers, takes place in the seventeenth century, and is chock-full of true-life characters who actually lived. A great irony is that the Duke of Buckingham who was murdered in 1628 by John Felton in real life as in the Dumas classic was the uncle of Barbara Villiers (born in 1640), Amber St. Clare's chief rival for the affections of King Charles II in the 1944 best-seller.

I agree that English actors would be the best to fill out a stellar cast, particularly in the role of King Charles, because most of the original Forever Amber featured players were British, excluding the American Glenn Langan (Rex Morgan), a Fox contract player who was a former college football star. Of the two leads only Darnell was homegrown, as were some of the supporting actors Anne Revere (Mother Redcap), Natalie Draper (Barbara Villiers), Jane Ball (Corinne Carlton), and Jack Russell, who played Black Jack Mallard the highwayman, and who died the very same week as Langan in January 1991.

Russell later had fame on t.v. as a cowboy, while Anne Revere, who won the Academy award for Best Supporting Actress as Elizabeth Taylor's mother in National Velvet, suffered under the anti-communist witch-hunt for her role in Gentleman's Agreement, which won the 1947 Best Picture award. The success of Gentleman's Agreement angered every Republican in Congress especially the future Vice-President Richard Nixon, and Revere's name went on the blacklist. Afterwards, she could only get bits parts in Forever Amber and A Place in the Sun, which also starred Elizabeth Taylor. Revere played Montgomery Clift's mother in the latter and had very little screen time.

George Sanders, who would later win the Best Supporting Actor award for his standout performance as Addison Dewitt in 1950's All About Eve, was one of the many Brits on the roster, and was perfectly cast for the part of the randy but regal King Charles II. Michael York in the telecast The Lady and the Highwayman (1988 on CBS), Sam Neill in Restoration (1995) and John Malkovich in the 2004 feature The Libertine were also excellent as The Merry Monarch, as Charles II was so aptly called.

P.S. Hugh Grant was the star of The Lady and the Highwayman, a delightful television movie based on a Barbara Cartland novel, while he only had a bit part in the R-rated Restoration. He might be a good fit for the part of Charles in a remake, but he isn't getting any younger, although he still looks great even with salt/pepper hair. Actors in their fifties nowadays seem younger than actors in their late twenties/early thirties looked way back then in the 1940s. Just some thoughts.

reply

Hi MJC4861,

I posted about this years ago prior to premium cable television and online outlets making inroads with shows like Game of Thrones [/i, [i]Peaky Blinders, and Outlander. In addition, there has been a proliferation of young British actors who are now dominated film and cable tv.

Forever Amber would make a terrific mini-series, especially if the historical characters were given the time they deserved. I recently wrote a review of the novel on Goodreads and noted that Winsor's fictional characters were not as vibrant and alive as the historical ones.

reply

I agree on all points.

reply

BBC should do a mini series. They are exceptional with their period pieces.

"What happens to a dream deferred?"

reply

As someone who devoured the book but has never seen the movie, an HBO series would be perfect. A two hour film would condense it too much for my taste,

reply

Amber – Diana Agron/Amanda Seyfrid/Natalie portman
Rex – Darren Criss
King – Nikolaj coster
Bruce Carlton – jude law/Alexander skarsgård
Mrs Carlton – Amanda peet
Barbara – Rebecca hall
Katarina - Golshifteh Farahani
Almsury – Jeremy renner
Nan – Ellen Page

reply

it might be too expensive to make in these sad times and take valuable screen time away from nerds-scoring-hot- chicks.


There are quite a few instances of nerds scoring hot chicks in Forever Amber.

Regrettably I don't think we'll ever see a remake of this. While the novel remains in print to this day, I feel like it has lost its freshness with the public. There isn't a wide enough audience to make it worth the cost of production. It would have to be a huge budget picture, or no picture at all. You can't film a novel like this on the cheap. Unfortunately it would be a huge gamble to make a 1944 popular novel into a modern movie.

reply

A remake would be good because they could make it closer to the original story. The film is very bland. it might be good as a costume mini series, they are very popular nowadays.

reply