MovieChat Forums > The Beginning or the End (1947) Discussion > Great Dramatic License for Understandabl...

Great Dramatic License for Understandable Reasons


My BS in nuclear engineering is from the University of Arizona and my MS is from the Air Force Institute of Technology. I worked Air Force intelligence in various assignments spread over a twenty-five year career, first in communications intelligence (the infamous "NSA") and later in what was most often called measurements and signatures intelligence.

Beyond the usual fiddling with the precise historical accounting of events to make a more dramatic movie TBOTE makes its most fantastic leaps because some of the material was still highly classified in 1947 when the movie was made.

Nobody died on Tinian from radiation. The character of Matt Cochran appears to be an amalgam of several scientists some of whom never went near Los Alamos. Dr. Norman Hilberry, for instance, who was a professor emeritus of nuclear engineering at the UofA when I attended was a personal assistant to Dr. A.H. Conant at the University of Chicago in 1942. It was Dr. Hilberry who handled the control rope on the cruciform safety rod. His wife's name was Ann, as in the movie. But other aspects of Matt Cochran seem to reflect Dr. Richard Feynmann, Dr. Harry Daghlian,or Louis Slotin. Dr. Feynmann was probably the youngest physicist on the project and worked in various capacities including supervising the data processor pool. The other two gentlemen died to radiation poisoning received while experimenting on plutonium cores at Los Alamos in the months after the atomic bombs were dropped.

The most glaring dramatic license was in the size and shape of "the bomb." The images used looked nothing like either Fat Man or Little Boy. Of course, thy would not want anyone to know what the bombs looked like in 1947. Also, Little Boy was made safe by Captain Parsons removing the detonator at the rear of the bomb from the charge that would propel the U-235 slug down the barrel of the bomb to the U-235 rings at the other end. Fat Man was too complex to be made safe the same way so it left the ground armed. Within a few years the means had been developed to remove the plutonium core of production bombs and render them safe.

Most, though not all of the information about the early bombs that was classified in 1947 has since been declassified and you can see detailed models of the external parts of Fat Man and Little Boy at the National Museum of Nuclear Science and History in Albuquerque, NM.

reply

I'd wager that the main "understandable reason" would most likely be the intense interest our future cold war rivals had of our atomic bomb program. I suppose it could be argued that they already knew who worked on our program by then but MGM didn't want to take the chance or weren't allowed to by the DoD (non disclosure act). All IMHO, of course.
KS

reply

I think you are right, at least in a general sense. Any person reviewing science journals that covered physics at the time could make a reasonably good chart of who was on the program by noting who among the scientists went "dark" and quit writing during the time.

Bomb design did not change significantly from "Fat Man" (Mark II) through Mark III. New designs came out improving on it, but I don't think they went into production until 1949, after it was discovered that the Soviets had detonated their "own" design (a copy of the Mark II) on 26 August 1949. By that time A-bomb development and design was rapidly evolving into a specialized engineering discipline. I'm sure that the physicists and engineers were strongly discouraged from discussing their work at all outside of classified channels.

reply

dr louis slotin was from Winnipg Manitoba Canada and I beief he died "tickling the drgon" and the bombs had been dropped on Japan - he gave his life to save others - Sadly there is only a small plagued in an obscure are of the city to remember his brilliance and sacrifice

reply

I don't remember the names, but if Dr. Slotin died doing research at Los Alamos during 1945, then I am reasonably certain (better than 95 percent, if you ask me to put a number on it) that he died "tickling the dragon."

This was an approach to critical experiment in which a block of enriched U-235 metal was dropped along a set of guide rails through an arrangement of similar blocks. With the additional block the "pile" would approach a critical mass for the fraction of a second to few seconds that it passed through. Detectors around the pile would measure the rapid rise in radiation, especially neutrons, coming off the pile. I think it was in September 1945, shortly after the signing of the surrender documents by the Japanese, that a Los Alamos scientist performed this experiment with a group of five to seven other scientists present. This was a relatively large group to have around while doing what was a recognized as a dangerous experiment and the size of the group indicates that they were becoming too comfortable with the tests. The dropping block jammed in the middle of the pile as it was passing through. The scientist, probably Dr. Slotin, recognized what had happened and pushed the entire assembly off the table, scattering the blocks and stopping the chain reaction. He saved the lives of the other scientists in the room by doing so, but it was too late for him.

Nuclear radiation is marvelously interesting and wondrous in its potential benefit. However, it is also dangerous stuff and can appear innocent, even innocuous.

reply

i should really check what I write - i am not illiterate; it is a small plaque and it is in an obscure area Thank you for reminding me of John Cusack - that is how Louis Slotin died; prolonged agony

reply

Interestingly, the film "Fat Man and Little Boy" more or less duplicates the Tom Drake death sequence with John Cusack playing the doomed young scientist....although unlike Drake, who breaks out in a slight sweat and then delicately faints, Cusack's agonizing death from radiation burns is dwelled upon in heartbreaking detail.

reply

Thank you for your service, dannieboy. And thank you for your clarifications to the truth vs. what they showed in the film here.

I do have to give kudos to the filmmakers for getting the markings and nose art on the B-29s correct. However, in one short scene they showed a B-29 marked "Enola Gay" as having defensive machine guns installed, and not the stripped-down "Sliverplate" configuration.

reply

Actually, by March of 1945 all of the guns except the tail guns had been removed or were being removed, not just Silverplate B-29's.

There is a lot of backstory on what was going on in the American bombing campaign against Japan.

The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

reply