MovieChat Forums > Song of the South (1946) Discussion > The film is still unavailable & a bigot ...

The film is still unavailable & a bigot is President. Happy now, haters?


When Disney took this film away, they thought the exact opposite of what's happening now would be happening today. A white racist endorsed by Klansmen is about to become president of the United States. After this, you cannot convincingly argue that taking this film away made racism go away. If anything, it just made things worse.

In the first 50 years of the film's life before the studio turned on it, we saw Brown v. Board of Education, a rise in black upward mobility, a resurgent African-American civil rights movement, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and more and more popular music with multi-racial influences (rock, R&B, soul, disco, and even the early years of rap before it turned violent, misogynistic and homophobic).

But after Eisner's heart attack and Disney turned on the film, things started to change, and not in a good way. Racial rhetoric started to become more divisive, the culture started to become more fragmented (and in a way, segregated), and the quality of both white and black music declined precipitously (keep in mind the film is called SONG of the South, and it's the sharecroppers' singing that attracts Johnny to their camp). And the same Disney corporate regime that took it away also foisted Justin Timberlake on us during his Mouseketeer days.

Corporate censorship is censorship and that's just what this is, plain and simple. A cover-your-ass move that they thought would make them look progressive, but it proves they're even more reactionary than they ever were. They still sell Touchstone movies on Blu-ray with anti-gay hate speech in it like My Science Project and the original Adventures in Babysitting, so they've got no moral leg to stand on.

reply

Yes, a bigot is now president.

Then Trump relieves that bigot of his job on January 20th of 2017.

Zippity Doo Dah!!!!!

reply

Here here.

reply

That doesn't even make any sense, you're not helping your "cause".

reply

The alternative would be a crooked, demented, abusive, screeching shrew with a bad pants suit in the White House. At least we dodged that bullet.

reply

A white racist endorsed by Klansmen is about to become president of the United States.


Since the KKK has got pretty much everything wrong since the Democratic party founded them oh so many years ago, it doesn't surprise me that they got it wrong again and backed the wrong horse.

The KKK wasn't paying attention. Trump is not the president you want if you want to keep minorities down. The left wants to keep us dancing on their plantation of entitlements and victimhood, while convincing many of them that the left is advocating *for* us. There's a small but growing percentage of us who are seeing the truth (finally). Under Trump, blacks and Latinos have the lowest unemployment rate *ever* recorded. Get the economy working where jobs are available, and people of all colors will work to improve their lot in life. The problem for the left is that once minorities start paying taxes, they'll start paying attention to what the government does with *their* money.

But you're right about one thing, the racists that deemed this movie racist (that's right) did not help the cause of racial equality, only hurt it. But if you ask me, it sure seems that that was the plan the whole time.

reply

Lol at your B.S.

The Democratic Party was a conservative majority in the days you bring up.

Republican and Democrat are labels, not ideologies.

It's hilarious how desperately Reich Wingers are trying to portray the "Left" as the "real racists."

Typical propaganda.

reply

The Democratic Party was a conservative majority in the days you bring up


More conservative than today's anti-American leftist Socialistic party? Yes, today's Democrats are not my father's. But it was the Democrat party established the KKK and voted against the Civil Rights gains made in the 1960s.

Dems try to deny their heritage but racism runs right through your party.

Conservatives do what conservatives have always done; keep the status quo.

Also strange that you said Reich Wingers (meaning right I presume). The Third Reich as designed by the Nazis was a Socialist government that promised much but delivered little but ruination. A strong central power government that had strict regulations on everything including the press and personal firearms. Sound familiar?

reply