Ingrid Bergman's Hair/Wig + 'French' Accent
I'm surprised so many people rave about how "beautiful" Bergman is in this movie. While it's a given - she's beautiful no matter what but didn't anyone else notice how terrible her hair (or wig) was in this film? Especially in the scene where she meets with her enemy's lawyer. Her hair looks like a hairpiece more appropriate for a character in the Munsters. It looks as if they dyed Bergman's hair to black or very dark brown for later scenes and while it is much better (Bergman as a brunette is not very believable imo) it's still not good. In fact, it really surprises me that everyone is so down on Robson (ridiculous black face but excellent acting) yet no one criticizes the fact that Bergman does NOT look Creole and her accent is NOT French.
Not only are Robson's eyebrows frightening but take a good look at Bergman's - they're pretty scary too.
While it's a fun movie to watch, it has a lot of flaws. Some due to the time in which it was made. Other severe errors and missteps due to sloppy filmmaking/producing. Was anyone watching the rushes?
A note on Robson's make-up: While Perc Westmore's name is listed as "make-up" he was in fact the head of WB's make-up dept. This does not mean that he personally worked on every film. The make-up department would have had several artists. I believe that both Robson and Bergman had a variety of people working on hair and make-up which accounts for the lack of consistency from shot to shot. However, a good director and good producer should have immediately noticed these glaring mistakes. They either didn't care, or did not want to spend the money to re-shoot scenes so that hair and make-up would be consistent and more realistic.
Forget about McKinney or Harris or Dandridge or Horne playing the Creole servant, Angelique. McKinney or Harris or Dandridge or Horne should have been cast as Clio. How could anyone believe Ingrid Bergman was Creole?