MovieChat Forums > I Know Where I'm Going! (1946) Discussion > Huh? Did I see the wrong movie?

Huh? Did I see the wrong movie?


I always feel a little embarrassed when people rave about a movie that I thought awful. You people saw something in this film that I did not see.

I thought this movie awful on so many levels: the plot was predicable, the acting weak, the metaphors hit you over the head with their silliness. "Oh, let's throw in a scene with a golden eagle here." What was the director thinking?

I did not like the main character "Joan Webster" or whatever, but if she were at least a little interesting maybe there would be a reason to like this film. She is somewhat close-minded but when she "opens up" we are supposed to feel something for her?? I don't think so.

I have liked many movies that are not considered "classics" so I guess this is another example of to each his own.

reply

As you say, each to their own. I think it's magical.

reply

I'm a big Powell/Pressburger fan, but this one let me down. I kept waiting for the magic and it just wasn't there. I found it especially unconvincing when Joan and Torquil fall for each other. They see each other for a couple of days and suddenly Joan gives up her ambitions? The rest of the movie was just as perfunctory.

reply

[deleted]

I think you didn't see the wrong movie, but that you are the wrong viewer for it.

It is unusual, so while I always want people to share my enthusiasm for this, one of my favourite films, I suppose I shouldn't be disappointed if they don't.

I disagree about the acting. The romantic leads are not a cookie-cutter or glamorous Hollywood couple, but, perhaps because of that, I think they have romantic allure. All the characterisation, in the script and the performance, is powerful, each person unique.

The filmmaking, in the sound, imagery, and editing is beautiful, with a light touch and charged with energy. The ceilidh scene, drawing together young, old, and the beginnings of mature love, is an enchanting celebration, packed with details that reward many viewings. And I don't think you can rightly say the plot is predictable when, as you also say, they "throw in a scene with a a golden eagle." Particularly when the eagle is indoors.

I think this is a thrilling, deeply touching film and hope you might try watching and assessing it again.

reply

Nothing to be embarassed about - I didn't get it either. I normally love Powell/Pressburger films and had looked forward to seeing this, but it left me totally flat. Wendy Hiller's character was annoying & I just wanted to smack her halfway through the film. As others have noted, there was zero chemistry between her and Roger Livesey (who I still adore). I just didn't believe they were attracted to each other at all. I had heard such great things about this, it was truly a disappointment. Maybe I'll give it another try later, but it will be MUCH MUCH later!!

One more thing - in all the descriptions of the film, it always seems to read somthing like: "headstrong YOUNG woman determined to marry middle aged tycoon is stranded on remote Scottish island and finds herself falling for a YOUNG naval officer." Now, Wendy Hiller at 33 might qualify as "young" but Roger Livesey was pushing 40 and they both definitely seemed a little long in the tooth for their roles. Perhaps that threw me off the film a little, too. Oh, well, to each his own!!

reply

I think that the spectacular landscape in Scotland, and the great cinematography, and the interesting Scots speech patterns, tend to compensate for the predictable plot. But since most plots have been told many times with slight variations, and each new iteration is enjoyable nonetheless, I wouldn't be critical of the plot.

reply

Fortunately the plot wasn't predictable for me since I read a misleading film description before viewing, lol. While watching it, though, I was saying, "Where have I seen this before?" I haven't decided yet which film(s) it reminded me of ;)


Mag, Darling, you're being a bore.

reply

I think part of the point of the film is that they are people who think they have life figured out, obviously in her case, and are surprised. Whether or not people writing about the film describe them as "young" is irrelevant.

In another thread (for those I have bored already who need not read further), I was talking about the beauty of the ceilidh scene, where there is the beginning of their mature love, counterpointed with the old and young love. I think part of the point of the film is that they are old enough to really recognise, at the right point, that any romance between them will not be a dalliance, but lasting.

I find it astonishing that anyone would not see any chemistry between Hiller and Livesey. And I find astonishing that a Powell & Pressburger fan would not love this movie, since it seems to me a consummate Archers film. I hope you do give it another try, whenever.

reply

I am a huge fan of the Archers and I adore this film.

Perhaps one needs to be of a certain age to appreciate it but I don't think that's necessarily so. I think one must be *patient* enough to appreciate it - the drama is subtle and the story is the emotional truth, not the plot.

I hope too that the naysayers will revisit it.

reply

@sophybliss

Since when is a 33 year old "long in the tooth"? Seriously, you must be under 20 to even think that. Yeah, 33 is young---it sure as hell ain't middle-age, and love is not confined to people under 40 anyway. Get over the age hangup,please.

reply

It's precisely because Hiller and Lievsey are older that the film works for me. The whole world has been at war for years, so it would have been normal for many people to have gotten a later start, under the circumstances.

reply

In the context of contemporary society your protests make sense.

IKWIG is a 60 year old film. Some people can turn off filters of modern life, some can't.

Regardless, I orginally saw this fil when I was in my late pre-teens. While I didn't understand it, there was a deep impression left. After viewing it again many years later, I know why it captivated me so.

The story does seem trite, but there is definitely a magical quality.

I doubt of P&P decided to throw something in. They're meticulous, courageous and visionary filmmakers.

reply

@2001-4

I was captivated by this movie and your oh-so spot on sentence:

"Some people can turn off filters of modern life, some can't."

I've never heard this phenomena worded so perfectly and succintly!

My good fortune is that I have to turn off the filters of "life of other times" to rejoin the present! :)


Enrique Sanchez

reply

Si! Great sentence by



...




Jove! รง\:0) And great lil' film too!!

reply

Everyone sees a movie differently-- esp. a good movie, and this is very definitely a good movie. If you watch it again, and you should, pay attention very carefully to what we are being told about the characters. Things are not laid out for us like a blueprint or business report, but rather like a puzzle or an elaborate painting.

Joan may be a gold-digger, but she has heart. Sure, she wants the finer things in life, but we also see at the beginning that she wants her father's blessing in this pursuit. He says, very appropriately as she behaves queenly in the restaurant, that she should stop acting, and for a moment she does and she show us, as Torquil later sees, how loving and needy and human she is.

The metaphors were heavy handed, yes, but I'll bet there are more than a few who don't even pick up on one of them. I don't think they detract from the movie, though, I think they add a certain charm and fun to a piece that is already full of both-- the plaid hills in Joan's dream, the fact that Mr. Campbell is so emotional at his anniversary party that he can't speak and that Torquil announces his love for Joan with lyrics from a Scottish ballad and then a pause in the dialogue that says more than any 100 lines of poetry could.

To anyone who would question the value of this movie, I say watch it again with an open heart and a keen eye, you will not be disappointed.

reply

This is one of my favorites but I had to watch it twice before I realized why. You may want to watch I Know Where I'm Going Revisited (1994) - it is a documentary about the original movie explaining many of the little details we kind of overlook as being fill-ins (even the telephone scenes). Would love to hear what you think if you do watch it.

vocatus atque non vocatus Deus aderit...

reply