absolutely awful


the acting is bad, yes. but the actors didn't really have a lot to work with considering the repetitive and awkward script. The worst part was the dialogue by the hypnotist at the end. I really cringed.

reply

watchamacallit says > the acting is bad, yes. but the actors didn't really have a lot to work with considering the repetitive and awkward script. The worst part was the dialogue by the hypnotist at the end. I really cringed.
This is a B movie. The studio didn't invest much time or money in these projects so they're usually all at about the same level of low quality. It wasn't the actors' fault as you said but it also wasn't the script writers or directors' fault. They did the best they could to crank them out.

Besides, sometimes you have to overlook the lower quality of something and take from it what you can. I thought the movie was dated but good. The Karen side of her personality was a wild woman who wanted to experience a lot of men. Today a lot of women are openly sexually promiscuous in ways most people would normally never imagine when this movie was made. Today the movie wouldn't make sense.

Maybe that's why some people drink; they want to unleash that other side of their personality; the side that will do what their everyday self knows they should not do. It exists in all of us but most of us incorporate the different parts of ourselves while some work very hard to ignore or reject the aspects they don't like. It's hard to do so their alter ego may still manage to sneak up to the surface anyway. This wasn't a bad movie considering what it was.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

as David Lynch would say, "fire walk with me"

reply