Out of the Country for Three Months?
One scene that I found somewhat jolting was a scene where Ellen Lawson is on the beach with two other pilot's wives.
They're wondering what they'll do with their husbands gone for three whole months. They were worrying about three months? One was planning on taking a war job for exactly that duration and probably give it up as soon as her husband returned.
Was this something the screenwriters came up with, or was that a genuine sentiment of military wives at that early stage in the war that they would be distressed over their husbands being gone for three months?
Did anyone point out to them that the war had been raging for almost three years at that point? It seemed to me that they all had been living like they still weren't in the war and had been enjoying a (comparatively) normal homelife. They would follow their husbands to various bases and have them come home at night. I guess they would have been shocked to learn that there were fighting troops that hadn't seen their homes or families for over two and a half years already (e.g. The 1st Canadian Division had gone overseas in December of 1939, and would remain until the war ended). Some U.S. Army and Marine Divisions had already been sent to Britain and/or the Pacific with an indefinite return time, not to mention the troops already in combat (troops in the Phillipines, naval units, etc.) who would definitely not be returning anytime soon. Meanwhile, they wonder what to prevent boredom setting in over three months?
You would think that some of the wives were married to career officers and recognized that long separations were a norm. As well, wouldn't they be aware that overseas deployments would just over the horizon for Army Air Force personnel and three months would be nothing?
It seemed to me that the wives shown in the film were blissfully ignorant about what was ahead. Was this a genuine sentiment, or an image of beautiful detachment that the screenwriters had?