Well, let's agree on the historical facts, e.g., Germany invaded Holland, France, etc and yes, the Nazis were responsible for the deaths of millions and should, therefore, be condemned unequivocally by right thinking people. What is at issue is the 'ergo' part. One writer says what can you expect from the Germans, especially after electing Hitler who had published Mein Kampf. Poor reasoning and more than a bit unjust to blanket an entire population for the misdeeds of a demonic power structure.
These comments go to the characterization of the German people as mostly being savages and complicit in the crimes of their Nazi government. Isn't this the same reasoning that is being widely rejected by the mainstream media, politicians, etc. of today with respect to the Muslim terrorists, i.e., since the preponderance of 'good' Muslims seem lacking in their condemnation of the miscreants among them, they must all be complicit in the terrorist acts of the few. Also, why wouldn't this same faulty reasoning apply to the Communists of Russia and China, who together murdered, at a minimum, over five times as many people as the Nazis. I've never read any responsible scholar suggest the Chinese people nor the Russian people should be condemned for allowing Lenin and Mao tse-Tung to come to power. While we're at it, what about the Japanese during this same period...is the ergo part equally applicable to the entire Japanese nation who saw the militarism of their *beep* filled leaders and let them come to power regardless? Oh, they weren't elected you might say...good point. After Hitler was 'elected' how many elections did he stand for subsequent to that? Didn't he follow the model of Moa, Castro, Stalin, etc and just decide to stay for the duration? Let's cut the general population of Germany and, by extension, all those other countries who come under totalitarian control some slack, not just charge the entire populace with complicity. This is why we don't condemn the entire nation of Iran for not standing up to their theocratic maniacs in government who execute homosexuals.
None other than Alexander Solzhenitsyn comments on this general fear in a population when he says that if the average Russian had ambushed with hammers, axes, etc. the communists who were patrolling the streets and checking the buildings maybe communism might have been stopped early on...but he doesn't condemn his fellow Russians for not taking that heroic stand, just deeply laments that they didn't. As scholars have written since WW II any nation could become, under the right circumstances, like the Germans during that period. Let's condemn the evil doers, but not broad brush all those who were fearful of their own lives in a totalitarian state, especially when there was absent the total freedom to speak against the government that we in the U.S. take all too much for granted.
reply
share