All the above comments are valid, but there is also a narrative need for Tessla to attack a very young Nikki. If he attacked a young woman, and then returned 25 years later to reclaim the same victim, she would be 40 something. Nothing wrong with 40 somethings--I can still remember when I was one of them. But conventions of the day required a more youthful heroine. So in the prologue, Nikki had to be a child.
Even so, Nikki should be too old for a typical 1940s horror heroine. When Tessla first attacks her, in 1918, she is ~8 year old. Therefore, in 1943 when he returns, Nikki is in her early 30s--and thus not the late teens/early 20s ingenue of the movie (Nina Foch, who played Nikki, was 18 during filming).
So, if anyone does the math, the grown Nikki that we see was not even born when Tessla made that first attack. But nobody noticed.
You can make an interesting study of chronological inconsistencies in the movies, particularly horror movies. My favorite is in a review of the 1998 sequel, "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer." The reviewer--I forget whom--wrote: "Shouldn't this movie be called 'I Still Know What You Did The Summer Before Last'?"
reply
share