We all know Lillian Hellman, whatever her talents, was virtually a fellow traveler in those days, but you don't have to be a Red in order to be anti-Nazi.
The play was a huge hit on Broadway, but one reason you may have found it boring is that it is pretty "stagey", hardly opened up at all, unlike most plays transferred to the screen. (Herman Shumlin, the director, was from B'way and directed only two pictures, this and 1945's CONFIDENTIAL AGENT.) But it is of course an intellectual exercise, not a shoot-'em-up, the finale notwithstanding. Some of the characters, or their traits, don't hold up too well, and of course the mid-war mood of optimism about the possibilities of a free and democratic postwar world seem quaint and a bit sad today; but overall this is a worthwhile play and film, certainly of its era, but a window into that time, and it's important to know and understand the thinking of a generation caught up in the middle of the greatest conflict, against a monstrous evil, in world history.
Give it another try. I too found it a bit dull the first time I saw it, but changed my mind with repeated viewings. It's really quite good and does have something to say. It's far too complex to sloppily dismiss it as a "commie dirge" that'd be a big hit in Red Square (and I doubt Stalin would've permitted the film in the USSR -- its democratic ideals were certainly not in line with his brand of "governance"). And it does have Paul Lukas repeating his stage role, and winning the Oscar for it -- and well deserved too. Davis wanted to do the film but Warner wanted a bigger star for the male lead. Bette demanded that the studio cast Lukas in the part, which she'd seen him do on Broadway, and she had enough power to get her way. Good for her.
reply
share