MovieChat Forums > The Song of Bernadette Discussion > To the sceptics out there

To the sceptics out there


What do you think really happened in Lourdes in 1858?

reply

Exactly what happens in the book and the movie......


"Ev'ryone deserves the chance to fly!"




reply

I believe as well.

reply

I think she saw what she said she did.

reply

[deleted]

Nothing!

reply

[deleted]

Some kind of archetypal image stored in the collective unconscious, accompanied by paranormal phenomena, entered Bernadette's conscious mind. As with Fatima and so many other "Marian" apparitions, the "entity" involved was not initially identified as the Catholic Church's Mother of God. To the contrary, Bernadette identified her "little lady" as "aquerra" - a local term pertaining to the kinds of nature elementals said to haunt grottoes and groves. What began as an essentially pagan encounter gradually coalesced into a dogma-friendly "Mary" - not the biblical Mary, but the Mary of Church doctrine. A pagan nature spirit- Jungian-Campbellian figure ended up as a culturally-determined archetype. The "Mary" of Fatima - and "her" attendant wonders - was even more spooky than the Lourdes apparitions - and much more difficult to tame (i.e., to bring into the parameters of official Mariology). Great movie on a subject that is problematic to present with both realism and dignity...

reply

[deleted]

I believe in Bernadette and her vision.


So do I.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

What is it about this film that connects it to S&M?

I dunno. Probably something to do with the religious extasy thing. Repressed sexuality and all that. People's feelings do seem to run rather high on this board.
I liked the score (I like all Alfred Newman's stuff) but I think the film was largely about David Selznick showing off his beloved. And a bit overlong.Jennifer Jones was a babe; no getting around that! (But Jean Arthur should have taken the Oscar that year for "The More the Merrier").
So what's with the guy with all those exclamation points?

cinefreak

reply

mhearn, the guy you're "debating" with had his posts removed. Judging by your posts alone, one would be hard pressed not to consider you an insane bully.

______________
Mulholland CineLog: http://mulhollandcinelog.wordpress.com/

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

As a skeptic, I would actually need to study the events carefully to actually "know" what happened.

From what I've read in this forum, some suggest the events were fairly accurately portrayed while others were pure Hollywood reconstruction.

One of the aspects of this film that I liked is the way the film left room for doubt. Her struggling family, it seems - despite some ridicule - benefited from her elevated status. And even the whole village benefited as pilgrims came - spending money. Life was very hard back then. How much blame can be assigned to a girl who brought such benefit to her family and village. The whole world wanted to believe.

Even in present times, it's not uncommon for kids to have imaginary friends.
If I were to "guess" - and that's all I can do - I'd say that one possibility suggested by the movie is that this sweet girl made up the story, perhaps for attention, and once she began talking about the supposed mystery woman that referred to herself as the "immaculate conception" - there was no going back.
Maybe the "woman" began as an imaginary friend for a sick little girl - maybe borders between reality and imagination blurred and over time it became easier for her to believe in her own fantasy.

I don't know, but I like fantasy and this is an excellent film, whether you believe or not.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

[deleted]

Ironclad Iconoclast,

May I offer some clarification to a previous post of ours? It has to do with the concept of the Immaculate Conception.

The birth of Jesus is the Virgin Birth. Jesus was conceived through the Holy Spirit and Mary remained a virgin at His birth. As I said, this is the Virgin Birth. The Immaculate Conception is a different belief -- and one that many practicing Catholics confuse with the Virgin Birth.

Catholic teaching states that everyone is born with original sin, inherited from Adam and Eve and the first sin ever committed -- the eating of the fruit/apple in the Garden of Eden. (Original sin is cleaned away in baptism.) In order to save mankind from original sin and all sins, God became man in Jesus and offered Himself as a sacrifice for sins. Mary of Nazareth was chosen to be the mother of Jesus, which meant that she would be the Mother of God Himself. God, being God, could not come into a person with a sinful soul. So it is believed that God kept Mary from sin all her life. She would be pure and holy as God is pure and holy. This also meant that Mary could not have been born with original sin; she had to kept pure and holy. To that end, Mary was born without original sin. She was conceived without original sin. Her conception was pure, immaculate. This is what Catholics believe of as the Immaculate Conception, that the Virgin Mary was conceived and born without original sin so that she would be holy to receive God into herself.

This is not a new idea. It was taught as far back as the 9th century. Even though it is an ancient belief of the Catholic Church, it was celebrated only locally as priests and bishops decided. It was not until a papal bull issued by Pope Pius IX in 1854 that the Immaculate Conception became a universal celebration in the Catholic Church. This is what makes St. Bernadette's explanation so important.

As I said, the belief in and the celebration of the Immaculate Conception was localized until 1854. St. Bernadette's visions occurred in 1858. The concept was still very new and not fully understood by most Catholics of the time (and, as I said, several Catholics of our own day.) When asked who she was, Bernadette's Lady could have answered "the Blessed Mother," "the Virgin Mary," the "Mother of God," or any other name that would have been familiar to a poorly educated working-class girl. However, she called herself the Immaculate Conception, which according to Catholic teaching, could only be one person. In the movie this term confused Bernadette, and probably did so in real life as well. But the parish priest, who had asked for the Lady's identification, it would have made sense, and would have surprised him. Would a girl like Bernadette, who struggled with her catachism, not only know of this term, but also understand who and what it meant? This answer to his question gave Bernadette's account more credibility with the Church.

I'm sorry for such a long post. I am not trying to proselytize, just to add clarification. My explanation is in my own words, and, whether theologically believed or not, I hope it is understood.

Thanks for your well-written posts on this thread.

"Thanks for the wings"
Spin

reply