MovieChat Forums > Yankee Doodle Dandy (1942) Discussion > Why Dont They Remake This One?

Why Dont They Remake This One?


I would like to see a remake of this movie, with Hugh Jackman as the song and dance man. Anyone think it would work? I love Jimmy Cagney movies, I wish they would either release Yankee Doodle Dandy and Angels With Dirty Faces on Blueray, or remake them. Would have to be better content, than some of the drivel that passes for entertainment today.

reply

Oh, God no!

reply

What's the obsession with remakes? There's no remaking this!

reply

Why would anyone want to remake any classic movie? Leave it alone

reply

What I WOULD like to see is a film or cable version of "George M!" a musical play that starred Joel Grey right after his triumph in the Broadway version of "Cabaret." The book dealt much more closely with Cohan's real life, including his marriages and fight with Actor's Equity. I believe there was a TV special circa 1970, but it was done concert-style, more like the rehearsal of a show rather than the show itself. BTW, Bernadette Peters played Josie Cohan.
May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?

reply

You have got to be kidding!

I can't think of a SINGLE remake that was better than the original, except perhaps DeMille's TEN COMMANDMENTS.

reply

I happy with the old version. In my opinion, nobody could top Cagney's performance.

reply

Michael Jackson would have been great as an updated George M. Cohan. Too bad he died shortly before he was going to take the role.

reply

and he would so have enjoyed the black-face sequence...

reply

The following is the reason, no, the two reasons, no, the four reasons, well, among the reasons that this movie cannot be remade:

1.
A. George M. Cohan was alive during writing, rewriting, filming, and at the time it was released.
B. He is dead.

2.
A. The star, James Cagney, started on the stage as a 'song and dance man.'
B. Those kinds of veteran stage actors do not exist.

3.
A. It was in filming when Pearl Harbor was bombed.
B. Pearl Harbor is an important United States naval and air force base. However, it is no longer the keystone of the pacific that it once was.

4.
A. It was released on the same day that the United States Pacific Fleet under Admiral Frank Jack Fletcher gutted the Imperial Japanese First Fleet under Admiral Nagumo at the Battle of Midway.
B. The Japanese are staunch allies and we are unlikely to see a naval confrontation anything close to the Battle of Midway again.

In other words, movies are a cultural snapshot in time. Time has evolved. It does that. We cannot live through "Yankee Doodle Dandy" again; that time has passed.

Perhaps it will inspire someone to do a musical biopic of Bob Fosse (oops, already done that). Perhaps it will inspire someone to do a musical biopic of Andrew Lloyd Weber. I don't think his resume is quite as broad as George M. Cohan's, he is extremely good at writing musical books.


The best diplomat I know is a fully charged phaser bank.

reply

Anyone think it would work?


Sorry, but not in the least. Not enough people know or care who GMC was for there to be any interest. If they did try to make it more contemporary, it likely would bear no resemblance to anything you say you love about Cagney movies. IMHO, anyway.

The universe is a big place, perhaps the biggest. Buy the ticket, take the ride.

reply

[deleted]

YDD was wartime propaganda - excellent, entertaining propaganda, but propaganda all the same. The movie could not be, or rather would not be, remade today with the same simple, uncomplicated patriotism because that sentiment is out of fashion in Hollywood. I don't think they could remake the movie without adding in a lot of stuff to make the message more complex and "inclusive". For example, there would inevitably scenes pointing out that GMC's America had racism! and sexism! These darker notes would transform the remade movie into something quite different from the original - no longer a remake but now a so-called re-imagining.

On a less political note, YDD is pretty inaccurate about Cohan's life and distorts history to serve the movie's purpose. (The US did not enter WWI because of the sinking of the Lusitania; YDD wanted to make the sinking analogous to the attack on Pearl Harbor, when actually two years separated the Lusitania disaster from our entry into the war.) While "improving" the facts for biopics was standard practice in 1942, it is no longer done so blatantly, perhaps for the best. And, while I understand and sympathize with the wartime motives of the filmmakers, perpetuating misunderstandings of history is not a good thing.

Besides, YDD is a great movie as is. It doesn't need to be remade. The fact that YDD is so much in and of its time is a not reason to remake it; it's a reason to treasure it unaltered. Modern audiences need to understand more about the past, not less.

reply

I love it when some clown suggests a remake of a near perfect classic replacing an iconic superstar with the most unlikely modern actor possible.
How about a remake of "Gone With The Wind" with Johnny Depp as Rhett Butler?

Soy 'un hijo de la playa'

reply

I love it when some clown suggests a remake of a near perfect classic replacing an iconic superstar with the most unlikely modern actor possible.


Sometimes I write such people off as being trolls. In particular, this idea of remaking this ultra-patriotic, rousing, and literally flag-waving American super-production to showcase a foreign-born actor of today.

That's just a ludicrous suggestion.

But finally I wonder whether this pining for remake of classic films using current stars might really mean a generation is beginning to recognize that modern movies tend to be lousy, compared to many from the past. It's too bad that such people don't consider how few remakes from the last 20 years or so have ever been as worthy as the originals.

Most great films deserve a more appreciative audience than they get.

reply