MovieChat Forums > Reunion in France (1942) Discussion > One of my favorite Joan Crawford movies

One of my favorite Joan Crawford movies


I relly don't know why Joan hated this. I think it is a great movie. And she look's totally FAB. I don't however care much of John Wayne.
Im glad it's been released on DVD

reply

I love this movie. Joan was great in it.

You are my Shearer, Crawford, Hepburn, Harlow and my Garbo

reply

It's a good movie, I don't get the general "thumbs down" for it either. (If someone is going to take it to task for some improbables they might as well put the kibosh on the half the movies from that time period). Joan did look great, agreed, but I particularly liked the storyline accent on her maturity from her initial shallow/jaded society flower.

reply

I really like it too. She probably hated it because it didn't make a lot of money (I gather that her war propaganda films didn't set the box office on fire). Bogart lost his own money on "Beat the Devil" and hated it. Pickford lost money on "Rosita" and hated it. These folks thought the public was always right, and they were in it as a business.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. Gandhi.

reply

Just watched this today. I was surprised at how much I liked. The ending was not what I expected, but it was the right way to end it with JOan's character standing on principal. Great film.

"My date last night was rude and just plain awful...and then he wouldn't even spend the night."

reply

I just finishing watching it for the first time, but i dont think it will be the last. I absolutely loved this movie and thought it was very sad, but happy. I also was surprised at how much i enjoyed it, hope everyone else does too :)

reply

I would have liked it better if not for one thing. Pat wanted to get out of France so bad but instead of focusing on that he was focusing on getting into Michelle's pants. That part of it lost credibility for me.

reply

eagle-ri says > I would have liked it better if not for one thing. Pat wanted to get out of France so bad but instead of focusing on that he was focusing on getting into Michelle's pants. That part of it lost credibility for me.
He's a man, enough said? Just because a war is raging and someone is trying to get out of the country he doesn't stop having natural biological urges. That's like saying how could he think about eating, drinking, or sleeping during that time.

It would be odd if she was the one trying to get in his pants because most women aren't as driven by the need for sex the way most men are. Sex can also be used by some as stress relief. After all that he'd gone through, being shot down, trying to stay out of sight, worrying about getting caught, not knowing who to trust, etc. he was probably very stressed. And, let's not forget, he could be captured and killed at any minute.

It's not unusual that he might want to share some tender loving with a woman he found attractive. It may be his last chance ever and, in those days, perhaps that would have been his only time. Women didn't put out as easily in those days as they do now.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

Hoomo_Deluxe says > I relly don't know why Joan hated this.
I have no idea why Joan Crawford disliked this movie, if she did. But, if I were to guess I'd say it was because of the character. Michele is not a very sympathetic person; not until the very end of the movie.

Early on she selfishly thinks about her own needs even when war is looming. She wants her fiancé to focus on her even though he's expressed several times his commitment to the things he has to get done. She is inconsiderate of the people who work for her or on her behalf. She keeps the dressmaker and her staff waiting so long they miss their plans and are exhausted. She doesn't seem to care as she frivolously talks about clothes when they're worried about the coming war.

Before parting company Cortot tells her specifically no matter what happens she cannot believe everything or she has to believe in him. I don't remember the exact words but it's a foretelling of what was to come. When she found out Cortot was working with the German's she never gave him the benefit of the doubt. This is a man she loved and was going to marry. He had been deeply patriotic, loved what he was doing for his country yet she easily believed he was some horrible person who would put finances above all else; innocent lives, his country, his self-respect; everything.

Her disbelief and lack of faith in him almost got him in trouble many times like with the coat incident and refusing to dine at his home. He could have been caught when she asked for his help with Pat and later he would have been killed for helping her escape. She disavowed him, broke their engagement, and seemed ready to move on to someone else yet he never gave up on her. He risked his own life to protect her but it took other people telling her what he was doing; how heroic he's been in order for her to finally get it.

I think it is a great movie.
I agree that this is a great movie. I loved the way it showed those of us who were not around at the time or who have not been in a war or in a country that's occupied what everyday life was probably like for the French during this time.

Usually in war movies we see the expected things; bombed out buildings, bombs being dropped, black outs, bomb shelters, etc. but this movie showed how there was a semblance of life as usual yet nothing was as usual. Some of the French sold their country out and benefited from their association with the Germans. Some did the same but as a cover; really they were risking their lives for their country. Unable to let others know, former friends and family hated them thinking they were greedy cowards. Some people lost everything they had as the Germans plundered and pillaged the country.

...she look's totally FAB.
I have to give Joan a lot of credit. I think she always transforms herself to look exactly how the character she's playing is supposed to look. She's had a wide range of looks and always seems to pull it off. In this movie she's supposed to be a rich glamorous socialite with a lot of leisure time on her hands. Later she becomes a struggling working girl with sore feet. She looks good throughout the movie but always appropriate to her station in life.

I don't however care much of John Wayne
I've never been a big fan of John Wayne but I think he's good in this movie. If he was supposed to be playing the smooth, polished leading man, I'd say it wasn't the right fit but he's not. He's portraying a young American RAF volunteer who was shot down and is trying to get out of France. Who personifies brash American tough guy better than John Wayne? A British RAF flyer would have been more reserved; a French flyer would have been more suave; but he just goes for it. He doesn't care who she is he tries to make a move on her like any bold, over-confident American guy would do.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

I prefer above suspicion with joan c, conrad v, basil rathbone etc to this movie. maltin has a classic movie book. I've surprised reunion in France made the cut. Above suspicion is preferable and in my opinion superior.

reply