Lucy


This character is a little mystery to me.

She gives hope to George about a potential love. She accepts his kiss, always smiling etc... But you can feel she doesn't really give a *beep*

During the sequence where George is telling her they will never see again (amazing sequence), her casual attitude is almost mean to him, one more time, like she doesn't care at all. But when he's gone, sadness appears on her face.

There is also this indian story she invents as a metaphor.

Well, i've never really get her motives. Is it just about teaching George humility? For the words he said against her father and for his refusal to work (exact opposite to her father)?

She's maybe the cleverest character in the movie. Do you have an opinion about the game she plays all along the story?

reply

My favorite lines of dialogue from Lucy were cut from the film; they were spoken during the "Snow Ride" scene just before the group begins singing "The Man Who Broke The Bank At Monte Carlo":

LUCY: "I wonder if we really do enjoy it as much as we'll look back and think we did...I feel as if I must be missing something about it, somehow, because I don't ever seem to be thinking about what's happening at the present moment. I'm always looking forward to something...thinking about things that will happen when I'm older."

I think this dialogue is a key to understanding Lucy's character. She is always looking toward the future whereas George's desire is for things to remain as they were. She has an ideal she is projecting for her future self that George is not comfortable with; he would rather remain in the past and stay with his first relationship - his mother (part of the Oedipal subtext Tarkington worked into his novel which is reflected in Welles' film). This incompatibility results in Lucy's ambivalence. I believe Lucy's late change of heart (in the original edit, we would have learned in the film's final scene that George and Lucy are to be married) is based on her desire to fulfill her father's wish of having a relationship with Isabel. However, crucially, George no longer has any power at this point, so one can imagine that Lucy will have complete control over their future lives together.

reply

Here is what I though for most of the film, but first a question if someone knows: Did Lucy and George know each other when they were young or not? At the ball he tells both her and her father he remembers them and Isabel says both times he does not...

So my take on Lucy: She led George along because her father wanted to marry his mother. I don't think she liked George at all. When she cries at the drug store scene (a scene I understand was added by RKO later) I think it's because his mother is going away, not because George is, and she is sad for her father. She totally tortures him over his desire for her. She even seems to enjoy torturing him. That's why I ask if she knew him when she was young, because to me she really seems to want him to get his comeuppance too.

Then later when she walks with her father and she tells about the old grove of trees named for this young Indian chief I think that kind of says everything about what she thinks of George. Of course then she can't remember the names she used two seconds later so she comes off like a con-artist too.....

This film was difficult to get the hang of in a lot of levels. The cuts and re-editing RKO did really messed up the beginning of the film making it hard to understand who was who and what was going on. But I am not sure even the original version this screenplay wasn't out of tune in many ways.

The print for the DVD was not in good shape either.
I think as with some old films a lot of techniques that were revolutionary then are things audiences are quite used to seeing now, so sometimes those are lost on viewers who don't watch with an appreciation for the era the film was made. However I also find Welles extremely heavy handed in his direction.

Anyway, my two cents on Lucy.

reply

Your comments on the character of Lucy are very perceptive. I agree that Lucy feels a responsibility to be courted by George for the sake of her father (this and the fact that there is an allure to being associated with such a well-to-do family). There is something very sad about Lucy being unable to establish a relationship with anyone else as the years pass ("I only want you" she says to her father in another of those "Oedipal" moments). Her eventual reconciliation with George could have resulted more from fear of ending up a spinster such as Fanny than from a newly-found devotion. Ultimately, it will be a surrogate Amberson-Morgan union to replace the unfulfilled union between her father and Isabel.

As to your question: Lucy did not know George as a child. By rote, George is responding "Remember you very well indeed" to every guest he meets at the last ball. Note how many people have been invited - part of the ostentation of the Ambersons is to host an event in which half the town is invited even if most of the guests have no interaction with the family any other time of the year. George's five-word greeting allows him to acknowledge each guest with the barest minimum of interaction. Clearly, he is not listening when his mother introduces Eugene and Lucy or else he would have realized they were father and daughter long before Lucy tells him.

reply