MovieChat Forums > You Belong to Me (1941) Discussion > No wonder there are no messages !!!!!!!!

No wonder there are no messages !!!!!!!!


I'm watching this thing right now and it is utterly ridiculous !!! How a woman like Barbara Stanwyck who is a doctor in this, could ever marry a jackass like Henry Fonda. I don't like this guy anyway, but he's playing such an idiot in this that a competent woman doctor would never marry him or else divorce him quickly as soon as she found out what a doofus he was and doesn't he work in this movie and is he just sponging off her. Had to say all this and sorry if I offended anyone.

reply

Hey, This movie is very funny, leave it alone.

"We go together like Cocaine and Waffles"- Cal Naughton, Jr.

reply

[deleted]

I wish more movies were like this, it's cute, romantic and funny!!!!!! You must be young!!!!!!!! Because very few movies of today aren't any good, they are vulgar and a lot of violence!! I just had to put my two cents in, snowflake....

reply

I think that the people who are critical of this movie for the way it portrays working women are reading it incorrectly. Keep in mind that it was written by Dalton Trumbo in an era after the Great Depression, when many families struggled with unemployment and poverty. I don't think that Trumbo was arguing against working women but rather he was critiquing the idle rich. His main target seems to have been Fonda's character, not Stanwyck's. After all, at the end of the film both characters are still working - and for the greater good of society. I think that this isn't a sexist film at all, but rather a remarkably progressive movie.

reply

I don't think they are complaining that the movie portrays working women in a negative light. Rather, they are criticizing Barbara Stanwyck's character in particular. On the one hand, she is obviously an intelligent, driven woman (especially to have succeeded in a male-dominated profession, ahead of her time). It just isn't believable for her to fall for a useless, lay-about idiot like Henry Fonda's character. Fonda has no redeeming qualities other than he loves her. In fact, he has a lot of negative qualities -- he is a hypochondriac, he lies to her, he is idle.

And Fonda's jealousy is way over the top. It's played for laughs, but it comes across as downright creepy. Even if you accept that Stanwyck fell for him in the first place, surely she would run from him after the first few times he expresses his wide green streak by bursting into her exam room or otherwise harassing her patients. That scene when he whacks her patient with the cracked tailbone -- on the tailbone -- and then trips him, well, it's not funny, it's nuts. When Stanwyck doesn't run out on him after that, both of them lose all sympathy.

Incidentally, the "workers' committee" in the department store was a bit creepy too, like something out of the Soviet Union. (Not surprising, considering the story was written by Communist Party member Dalton Trumbo.) That a firm should not hire a millionaire because he is theoretically taking a job away from someone who might more deserving -- well, that's not what companies do. They give jobs to whoever performs best, not to who "deserves" it more because he is poorer. That's a little bit of Marxism slipped into this script. And they say Dalton Trumbo wasn't really a Communist.

Remember, Trumbo wrote two books, "Johnny Got His Gun" and "The Remarkable Andrew," to keep America out of World War II early on -- because the Soviet Union had a pact with the Nazis. After the Nazis invaded Russia, suddenly Trumbo switched sides, now advocating for U.S. involvement. Trumbo also informed to the FBI on people who wrote him letters of support during his anti-war period.


reply

He wasn't sponging off her, he was a rich guy.

reply

You certainly didn't offend me: I totally agree with you. I was just watching it and made it to about 40 minutes, then gave up completely, in total disgust. I've seen tons of Stanwyck films and this is the first one I ever just walked away from. It was so ludicrous, absolutely ridiculous and painful to watch. What a mess!
I like Fonda but he was totally unlikable in this; I don't think he was sponging off her since he was wealthy in his own right, but he certainly played the whiny loser, spoiled brat to the hilt and I didn't believe for a moment that she would ever have actually married someone like this. I'm giving this a 3 star rating & that is being generous.


You've done some bad things, sweetie.

reply

In a way it's a tribute to Fonda's acting that he was willing and able to make his character so thoroughly unlikeable. I agree, though, that Stanwyck's character would be unlikely to stick around after the second meltdown. I also made it to 40 minutes--a spot where it's nearly impossible to not become utterly disgusted--and then came here. I decided to try to watch the whole thing. I made it, but it was tough!!

reply

[deleted]

I found it quite funny and enjoyable. I breezed through the 40 minute barrier.

reply

I read the 1,000 page biography on Stanwyck...and it doesn't even get to this point in her career. So this 94 minute movie was a breeze. I thought it was cute, and pretty progressive in that she was still a career woman at the end of the picture.

reply