Let me preface this by saying I am a big fan of Errol Flynn (except in this movie), as well as of movies depicting this period of American history. I know a lot of people like this movie but I just can't stand it.
It stretches the truth so unreasonably far that I simply can't suspend my disbelief enough to enjoy it at all.
They might as well have made a movie about General William Tecumseh Sherman running a brothel in Atlanta instead of embarking on his March to the Sea.
[deleted]
Same here
shareI can not disagree with you.
How do the angels get to sleep when the Devil leaves his porch light on?
"They might as well have made a movie about General William Tecumseh Sherman running a brothel in Atlanta . . ."
Ha! That would have made one hell of a movie! Then Sherman would have came out the war a RICH man!
I agree with what you said about this movie.
Why don't you move to Liberia!
shareGo away!
The movie was entertaining but as far from historical as it can be. It was a movie filmed from a certain time and era, WW2 was hitting the world and the people liked to hero worship. Errol Flynn is interesting but Custer was an egomaniac and a fool and deserved his "reward".