MovieChat Forums > The Little Foxes (1941) Discussion > The ending left me wanting more. Anybody...

The ending left me wanting more. Anybody else feel the same?


Didn't you just get the feeling that there was more drama to unfold between Regina and her two brothers, not to mention Leo? But the way this movie ended, it seemed so abrupt, almost like a cliff-hanger!

When the end suddenly came, I felt downright frustrated. I just didn't want the story to end! lol

***
"Nice beaver!"
"Thank you, I just had it stuffed."

The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, there should've been a 3-way fight between the Terminator, Rocky Balboa and Chuck Norris. And we all could've wept when the Terminator gets stabbed in the eye by a spear. Wouldn't be boring then, would it?



You can't hold a candle to Gulbenkian.

reply

[deleted]

Listen up, you fool: this film is character and dialogue-driven. And in that respect it's equisitely nuanced. Waaaay above your level of movie appreciation. The enterainment quotient of this film wasn't predicated on visual hyperbole, such as racing chariots, explosions, macho antics etc. Surprised you were able to extricate yourself away from your Playstation game -- even for a moment -- to go to IMDb and make your (worthless) contribution.

You can't hold a candle to Gulbenkian.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Listen up, you fool: this film is character and dialogue-driven. And in that respect it's equisitely nuanced. Waaaay above your level of movie appreciation. The enterainment quotient of this film wasn't predicated on visual hyperbole, such as racing chariots, explosions, macho antics etc. Surprised you were able to extricate yourself away from your Playstation game -- even for a moment -- to go to IMDb and make your (worthless) contribution.


Two years late, but I just wanted to take a minute to point a condescending finger to the twat (mark_shleck-1) who used an expression like "The enterainment (sic) quotient of this film wasn't predicated on visual hyperbole".

Possibly the most pretentious sequence of words ever written? (Or maybe it depends on what the meaningfulness quotient of that definition is predicated on? Teehee.) How does one define the "entertainment quotient" of a film, mark_shleck-1?

reply

[deleted]

Possibly the most pretentious sequence of words ever written?


No, not really. I understood what he meant, and didn't disagree. I mean, I guess people don't use the phrases "predicated on" and "hyperbole" all that much -- especially in the discussion of comic book action pictures -- but those words mean stuff, and when they're all strung together like mark_shleck-1 did it, it winds up saying something that may even be sort of true and probably is.

So, as a reader, I'm fine with it.

--
LBJ's mistress on JFK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcXeutDmuRA


reply

That's exactly what I was hoping for. And tits.

reply

The ending left me wanting more. Anybody else feel the same?
by - Eric-1226 on Tue Aug 28 2007 10:06:59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't you just get the feeling that there was more drama to unfold between Regina and her two brothers, not to mention Leo? But the way this movie ended, it seemed so abrupt, almost like a cliff-hanger!

When the end suddenly came, I felt downright frustrated. I just didn't want the story to end! lol

______________________________________________________________

I agree completely.

But the brother spelled it out that he was going to blackmail Bette Davis over the husband in a wheelchair being found on the stairs---

my guess would be to get a better percentage of the deal for himself.

reply

[deleted]

I agree- I think that Regina realises that her life will follow a downwards spiral from there on...if not, we know she will certainly have a rude awakening when she realises that she is losing more than her daughter after the aforementioned blackmail possibility is brought to her notice...


....LOVED IT!!

reply

[deleted]

I think this movie has one of the most poignant endings ever.

If he tries to blackmail her, she will have him arrested for his part in stealing the bonds. So it is a standoff. Ben will get richer, and Oscar will get richer. And Regina will get very, very rich. But it will mean nothing in the end. She will be a very wealthy, very lonely woman.


Well not if she's just going to go to Chicago and have an affair with Mr Marshall. I think Alexandra was the only person Regina ever truly loved, but it wasn't conscious and the loss of her isn't something Regina will fully realise until much later in her life. In the meantime she will enjoy the company of her money and other rich people, and have 'everything she wants.' You know how through the whole movie she goes on about how she's never had anything she wants? She'll keep thinking more money, trips to Paris etc etc will make her happy. It'll only be much later that she'll consciously feel the full impact of the loss of Alexandra and realise what is really important. She might even start to miss Horace, but it won't happen straight away.

That's my interpretation anyway.

Thou met'st with things dying, I with things new born.

reply

When the play was adapted into a film, the ending had to be changed. The Production Code didn't allow evil to triumph and Regina is triumphant at the end of the play. There was no David in the play to rescue Alexandra and in the play you're left with the nasty feeling that Alexandra might become another Birdie.

reply

The ending in the play is really similar....Horace secretly leaves Addie some money, and Alexandra runs (or is going to run) away with her. Regina is still left alone, she doesn't triumph.

Thou met'st with things dying, I with things new born.

reply

Hi Regina Giddens,

She goes to Chicago though.

reply

She goes to Chicago in the movie too...

The play and movie both end in nearly exactly the same way. In the play, Alexandra says, 'are you afraid Mama?' and Regina just walks up the stairs alone.

Thou met'st with things dying, I with things new born.

reply

Hi Regina,

I saw the play a number of years ago, one production with Lee Grant, another with Elizabeth Taylor. After seeing them both, I felt Regina got what she wanted at the end. She became a rich widow who went to Chicago and left her family to fight among themselves. The love and respect of her daughter ppeared secondary to her ambitions, at least to me. While I've always loved the movie more than the play and enjoyed Richard Carlson's acting, I felt that the film softened Regina's character in subtle ways.

reply

Well i've never seen a production of it, i've only read it. I think the ending leaves it open to the director to choose to depict Regina as triumphant but just on the page it looks as though she's defeated.

Regina does not answer. She movies up the stairs and out of sight. Addie, smiling, begins to put out the lamps

Thou met'st with things dying, I with things new born.

reply

Hi Regina Giddens,

I agree - It's up to the director, especially in the theater. To be honest, I enjoyed the film more than both versions of the play but both were great productions.

reply

I want to know more about Zan and David. Will they remain in town or will Zan feel it to be unbearable to live in the same town as her relatives? What about Birdie? I hope if Zan and David remain in town,that Zan is allowed to visit her.

Lorraine

reply

I've just watched it and I was very surprised when it ended it had just got going and there was so much about to happen. Talk about leave you wanting more!

reply