joe pendleton
i have always felt that joe pendleton got a bad deal at the end,yes he became champ,but as ralf murdock!! and he got the girl in the end....i just didn't like the way it ended,,,but still a great movie...............
sharei have always felt that joe pendleton got a bad deal at the end,yes he became champ,but as ralf murdock!! and he got the girl in the end....i just didn't like the way it ended,,,but still a great movie...............
share[deleted]
good thread,,but you cut me down anyway,,,ha ha..thats ok...
but you see my whole point,,,is that he didn't remember who he was?because of mr.jordan.mr.jordan promise him the championship as joe pendleton!and you cant say that he never might have met bette,thats the whole mystery of life and who you might meet in it.no they botched up his life and thats a fact.....still love the movie ...dont love the ending
so lone champ
but i got to admit'it seams like they did leave him little bits of memmory of joe??????
later lefty
[deleted]
how did you know! LOL
sharemaybe less than ideal but not an overall bad deal. particularly in light of what really was important to him. he got both things that he treasured most in life at the end, the girl and the title. not a bad deal when you think about it that way.
shareyes he did get the love of his life and the championship..
shareYeah, in the end the most important thing was Betty. Although he didn't remember being Joe he would still retain the essence or spirit of Joe.
You can't palm off a second-rater on me. You gotta remember I was in the pink!
The ending was all wrong.What happened to Joe, then? He's all good as dead.
shareI agree. Even if you believe in a soul, the ending is wrong - his soul is presumably in heaven (or Limbo!?) and he was supposed to live longer than that.
shareEven if you believe in a soul, the ending is wrong - his soul is presumably in heaven (or Limbo!?)
To me, the loss of one's memories is equivalent to death because they are an essential part of one's identity. I would not call this a "relatively minor thing" at all! What I was trying to say was:
1. I don't believe in a soul, so I accept that I am suspending disbelief when watching this film. That's fine. However:
2. Even if I DID believe in a soul, I would still have found the film "wrong" because even though his soul is allowed to live on in a living body, it doesn't change the fact that he lost his memory of being Joe, so where's the benefit? To me, it's as if a NEW person had been created in Murdoch's body, and Joe was... well, nowhere at all.
Does that help to clarify my meaning?
so I accept that I am suspending disbelief
To me, it's as if a NEW person had been created in Murdoch's body
Oh I see - so you're saying that after he gets to heaven, he then remembers everything. OK, well my theological knowledge isn't up to the job of disagreeing with that, so I'll take your word for it. If this is the case, then I agree with you.
shareAgreed. Great film but the ending didn't make sense. I mean, wasn't Joe scheduled to join his parents on the morning of May 11, 1991?
"Let us be crooked, but never common."