WHAT A STINKER!!!!


I was anxious to see this; after all the things I'd read and heard about it over the years, and I finally got to see it......

Perhaps I saw a different movie; Ball of Fire? uh, perhaps not so much....this has to be Billy Wilder's worst example of writing.

I sat in my living room, watching this thing slowly unfold...and I do mean SLOWLY....it was slow, dull, and I did not laugh or even smile ONCE during this whole TEDIOUS movie............

Interesting to see Stanwyck in a light role, but that's about it....this thing just goes on and on and on.......I could not believe how bad it was and so dull!!

So I know most of you will be after me with torches and pitchforks, but, sorry, folks, this one's a DUD.

Someone please tell me the appeal or what was funny about this movie? Please? I hate to be all alone out in left field......

Surely someone else out there agrees with me?

reply

That is, I disagree that this is a stinker. I agree though that you must've watched another movie.

In my opinion, it was adorable.

Spare me your 6th grade Michael Moore logic! ~ Secretary Heller; 24, Day 4, 7:30:00 a.m.

reply

Sorry, BG, but I can't support you here -this was a very good movie according to all sorts of different points of view.
But, hey, wait around; you'll find someone to join you in left field soon enough.

reply

I was anxious to see this; after all the things I'd read and heard about it over the years, and I finally got to see it......
I think that's your problem right there. Sometimes we hear people praise a movie and have great expectations, only to be disappointed. I personally love this movie for what it is, a funny romantic comedy with the amazing Barbara Stanwyck and sexy Gary Cooper.

If you want to see Ms. Stanwyck in other light roles, you should check out The Lady Eve and Christmas in Connecticut. Just try not to expect Citizen Kane and you might enjoy them.


I need my 1987 DG20 Casio electric guitar set to mandolin, yeah...

reply

What do you like, Contrarian?
I'm guessing Adam Sandler rules for you but you're too Ascared to admit it...

Love The Oldies

reply

this has to be Billy Wilder's worst example of writing.
From the QUOTES section:
Sugarpuss O'Shea: SLIGHT rosiness? It's as red as The Daily Worker and just as sore!
If you think clever writing like this is terrible and you didn't laugh, it certainly must have been way over your head.

reply

YESSSSSSSSSSSS I understood the 'humor' of that line, but found this movie almost unbearable to watch....and I like Wilder's work!!!

Watching this movie for me was like trying to walk thru a room where the floor's covered in molasses....you wanna go go go but you just can't.....you get stuck all the time.

I feel the entire premise of the storyline was absurd, even for a 'comedy'...and I didn't find any part of this movie the least bit funny......Great to see the cast and their performances, but overall, as I said originally, this is a 'stinker'.......

Guess I'm out of the mainstream with that opinion but I stand by it.

Surely I can't be the ONLY person who disliked this movie??

Come on, those of you who agree with me............anyone???!?!?

reply

I like this movie, and I'm not justifying myself either.

You didn't like it? Well, so you didn't. Not all movies are made for everyone.

~~
Jim Hutton: talented gorgeous hot hunk; adorable as ElleryQueen; SEXIEST ACTOR EVER

reply

A lot of what makes up what you refer to as 'comedy' is, in fact, 'the absurd'. When you state you 'understood' the humor of a line, it means you don't get it. And then when you add "I didn't find any part of this movie the least bit funny", you're saying to everyone you don't have much of a sense of humor...or at least a sense of irony. Or not for the type of humor Wilder/Brackett or Wilder/Diamond dishes out. Stick to heavy-handed comedies and you'll be safe. Something with a lot of blatant jokes about sex organs.

reply

So you didn't like it because the pacing was slow for your tastes and the humor was too old fashioned. Now I'm trying not to assume you are one of those people that buy a ticket to turn your brain off for 2 hours, so I'd like to say it's a period piece. It was a different time, development was necessary. Nowadays everything is rush rush get to the next prat fall and fart joke. It's a clever film and Barbara in my opinion is sexier than any plastic Barbie we see nowadays.

Now for the record what comedy movies do you enjoy?

reply

I'm watching it right now and I totally disagree with you. Please excuse me for saying this, but your post seems a bit like a troll. I suggest this because you seem to be so desperate to find someone to agree with you. Why do you care what other people think of this film?

What films do you find funny? What puts you on the floor, convulsing with laughter? Maybe you'll find someone who is willing to hold your trembling hand in the cinematic darkness.

reply

"Interesting to see Stanwyck in a light role, but that's about it....this thing just goes on and on and on.......I could not believe how bad it was and so dull!!"

I can't believe you wrote that, or meant it, let alone SHOUTED it.

"Ball of Fire" is #92 on the AFI's top 100 list of comedies of all time, so I doubt you will get very far dissuading anyone from appreciating the film.

There is also "The Lady Eve," with Barbara Stanwyck at #55 which will probably offend your olfactory apparatus, too.

And do stay away from "Remember the Night" and "The Mad Miss Manton." While neither of these latter two are on the AFI's top 100 list of comedies of all time, many people enjoy them, myself included.

But no doubt they would also smell up your house.

reply

I hate Top 100 lists, whether they be on music, films, or margarine. Trying to convince the public what the top 100 is of anything seems ridiculous to me, since it's all, and should be all, a matter of personal opinion.

Having said that, I watched 'Ball Of Fire' for the first time last week cos I wanted to see more films by Gary Cooper, and I liked it enough that I ordered a copy on DVD that same night. The slow pace is full of interesting dialogue, especially when you consider that we're talking about slang that dates back to the 40s.

In fact, one of the most ironic and funniest parts of this film for me was when they used the expression 'bang', since modern day slang gives it a completely different meaning entirely!

A second highlight for me was the drummer, since in my ignorance I had no idea such accomplished and frantic drumming went back that far.

:)

reply

Cutting his first recording in 1927, Gene Krupa was one of the first drummers to make the drum a solo instrument, urging the development and use of multiple, tunable tom toms, the creation of the hi-hat cymbal, and popularizing many of the current cymbal techniques. By 1940, Krupa led his own swing orchestra (featured in “Ball of Fire”) but in 1943, Krupa was arrested for possession of two marijuana cigarettes and was given a three-month jail sentence.

Some will claim that the use of marijuana was why Krupa’s popularity never fulfilled his early promise, while others claim it was the change in popular music styles, since Krupa was never able to comfortably adjust to be-bop. Whichever is true, and my vote goes to the latter opinion, how you see Gene Krupa in “Ball of Fire” is Krupa at the top of his game.

In 1978, Gene Krupa became the first drummer inducted into the Modern Drummer Hall of Fame.

Krupa’s performance on drums with Benny Goodman and His Orchestra in the 1937 recording of “Sing, Sing, Sing” was inducted into the Grammy Hall of Fame in 1982.

And last, and probably least, a somewhat “Reefer Madness” - oriented biopic entitled “The Gene Krupa Story” was released in 1959, starring Sal Mineo in the title role.


And yes, I too am no lover of Top 100 lists, but AFI's top lists being the aggregate opinion of a very large number of people in the business, yet in no way involved with pushing their own product, I feel are at least worthy of consideration.

reply

Wow, that's a lot of great information, thanks very much for that!

Certainly we can agree that dismissing this movie as bad is an ignorant thing to do.

:)

reply

Krupa's popularity never fulfilled his early promise? He was a superstar from the mid 1930s until his premature death in 1973. And, there are many recordings, from the late 1940s-on, that confirm he was quite comfortable playing be-bop style.

reply

go-titans,That drummer was the incomparable Gene Krupa; one of the true artists of the 20th century.

reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBs9gZQX7lQ

Here's a lovely little clip of the Benny Goodman quartet from 1937, featuring Krupa on drums, and also featuring Lionel Hampton and Teddy Wilson, an integrated team rare in 1937. The chemistry in the group was wonderful too: two hot temperaments (Hampton and Krupa), two cool (Goodman and Wilson), and fitting together marvelously.

reply

Its hard to dismiss this movie as slow as molasses because it had so many fantastic charactor actors and great stars when they truly were stars....very enjoyable....

reply

I don't think anyone with a brain will agree with you.
If you don't like this you don't appreciate great film comedy.

reply


I agree with the OP big time! And I'm a Wilder/Stanwyck fan. But this one...absolute talky BORE of a movie. The
professors aren't cute - their annoying. And that scene with them at the motel where Richard Haydyn talks, and
talks, and TALKS!

Only Stanwyck is worth watching, but even she cannot save this thudding bore of a film.

reply