MovieChat Forums > They Drive by Night (1940) Discussion > 'I Committed Murder to Get You! Understa...

'I Committed Murder to Get You! Understand, MURDER!!'


Some films are simply greater than the sum of their parts. Ingrid Bergman went on record several times that no one on the CASABLANCA shoot had any clue that they were making a film that would rival the likes of CITIZEN KANE for the title of "Greatest American Film."

One suspects the same "business as usual" atmosphere prevailed on the set of THEY DRIVE BY NIGHT, a noir melodrama directed by Raoul Walsh for Warner Bros in 1940. A partial reworking of an earlier film titled BORDERTOWN, this film follows the ups and downs of the Fabrini brothers, long-haul truckers trying to move up from dodging poverty and the bill collectors at every turn to sufficient success to allow one brother to marry and the other, already married, to start a family.

Good enough setup for noir melodrama, but it deviates wildly right in the middle of the picture into a crime drama. The crime in question is murder and the criminal case dominates the second half of the film. Somehow the transition from one kind of story to another works remarkably well, so well that I would consider it a classic of the noir genre.

All the more remarkable when you realize that this was a B picture. Shot on a budget of $400,000.00, a modest sum even in 1940, with a cast of Warner Bros stalwarts, none of whom were great stars at the time.

Joe Fabrini, the older, unmarried brother, is played by George Raft. Raft was never much of an actor, and never quite made it out of the B pictures, but the part makes few demands on what talents he had; his performance as a result works perfectly for what is required of it.

Brother Paul is played by Humphrey Bogart, who in 1940 was still a couple of years away from his eventual superstardom. Bogart displays a gentleness and sensitivity that he seldom got to show once he became a big star.

The rest of the men in the cast are Warner's contract players, solid character actors all. It's the women who really elevate the piece to near A status.

Ann Sheridan plays Cassie Hartley, a wise-cracking, down-on-her-luck waitress with whom Joe falls in love almost against his will, focused as he is on the trucking business. Sheridan brings her usual "oomph" to the role and gets most of the best smartass lines.

Paul's wife Pearl is played by Gale Page, an actress of decent ability whose career was pretty much spent in B pictures, probably because she excelled neither in dramatics or in beauty. But Page is just right here; putting someone with bigger acting chops or greater beauty in this role would have thrown the picture badly off balance.

Then there's Ida Lupino as Lana Carlsen, the wife of a friend of Joe's who owns his own trucking company and who secretly lusts after Joe despite his repeated curt rejections; he admits she's attractive, but he's a man of honor: he will not betray his friend by sleeping with his wife. Ever.

Lana's passion for Joe is ultimately her undoing. She does not love her husband, and probably only married him for his money, so one night after a party at which he gets sloppy drunk, she puts the car in the garage, leaving it running, and closes the doors. Her husband, dead drunk, dies of carbon monoxide poisoning.

The DA rules it an accident, so Lana cons Joe into coming into her late husband's business as her "partner," though it is clear that her use of that word implies more than just business. Joe reluctantly agrees, mainly so that he can give a job to Paul, who in the middle of the film loses an arm in a wreck after falling asleep at the wheel.

Lana thinks she's got him. But he still wants nothing to do with her, partly because her late husband was his friend but because by this time he has decided to ask Cassie to marry him. Driven to desperation, Lana confesses her crime to Joe in a misguided attempt to show proof of her love for him. Appalled, Joe makes tracks, and Lana, not about to be outdone, decides to tell the DA that yes, she killed her husband, but she did it because Joe Fabrini told her to.

The trial that follows is pretty standard stuff for a noir melodrama, until Lana takes the stand. What happens in these few minutes should have garnered Lupino an Oscar nomination, but she was still a B actress being groomed as a possible foil for Bette Davis. In fact, watching this film, I thought what a great part Lana would have been for Davis. I don't know if it was ever offered to her, but if it was and she turned it down, it was a happy mistake, because as much as I love Bette Davis, Ida Lupino is so perfect, so compelling, and at the end so utterly chilling in the part that she OWNS it. And then some.

Not bad legs for a B picture, it was a huge hit that propelled Bogart toward full stardom. Unfortunately it did not do the same for Lupino, a brilliant and gifted actress whom the studio cruelly misused; with her titanic talents, she could have given even La Davis a run for her money if the studio had only allowed her to.

This is one of those movies that I always simply MUST sit down and watch whenever it comes on. It is a great demonstration that it is not always necessary to break the bank to make great entertainment.

Never mess with a middle-aged, Bipolar queen with AIDS and an attitude problem!
roflol ><

reply

I agree with most of your observations. I felt Ida Lupino was seductively beautiful therefore perfectly cut-out for this role. I did not like Raft at all, instead I actually found him a little funny in some scenes. I could imagine Bogart in that role, but maybe its my problem, I am unable to see anyone like Raft having a superiority of Bogart.

Nonetheless, a good movie. Just like you said, wonderfully transitioning from a truck drivers' drama into a femme fatale noir. I enjoyed this movie very much. I also found 'Irish', very funny and his girl friend who goes to the court and addresses the attorney as 'Your Honour" :)

reply

Raft was never much of an actor, and this film is no exception, but as often happens with modest talents, pairing him with actors better than he was raised his own performance several notches from what it would otherwise have been. The one-on-one scenes between him and Bogart, Sheridan, and Lupino all forced him to work just a little harder, and every time I see this film I can't help remarking upon the positive effect all three of them have on Raft's performance: perhaps it wasn't a great performance, but it certainly ranks as one of Raft's best; in spite of his usual reliance on his trademark mannerisms he is solid, credible, and sympathetic.





Never mess with a middle-aged, Bipolar queen with AIDS and an attitude problem!
roflol ><

reply

I agree with most of your observations. I felt Ida Lupino was seductively beautiful therefore perfectly cut-out for this role. I did not like Raft at all, instead I actually found him a little funny in some scenes. I could imagine Bogart in that role, but maybe its my problem, I am unable to see anyone like Raft having a superiority of Bogart.


Not one of my favorite Bogart films, but he's good in this, slightly outside his usual wheelhouse and still playing the supporting role just before his stardom. I really liked Sheridan. She got some great lines and she snapped them off crisply. Also, I liked how independent the character was, determined to make her own way and work her own jobs. She was a good foil for Raft's character.

Lupino plays a classic early film noir fatale. One could argue she becomes downright histrionic on the stand, but...well...people like her do tend to look histrionic when they're melting down like that. And it's creepy, though I think, by far, the most chilling moment is when she gets the idea to kill her husband.

Alan Hale Sr. was very good at making a character who could easily have been a drunken jerk likeable. That's part of what makes the murder scene so chilling.

But Raft...well, the character really isn't very likeable and Raft just lacks the ability to get the audience's empathy. I guess I'm not a fan of his usual kind of role.

Innsmouth Free Press http://www.innsmouthfreepress.com

reply

I've always liked Lupino, but are you serious when you suggest her scene while on the stand in court should have gotten her an Oscar nod??? I don't see it. Maybe because the entire proceedings that brought about the court trial were bordering on hilarious in their foundation. Lupino eventually confessing to the DA and the DA just came off like he was hoping to get some from Lupino by blindly believing her story and immediate calling all cars for Joe's arrest the minute she makes the statement in his office. I mean seriously with any form of investigation and serious application of the law, Joe would have never even been charged, much less indicted and brought to trial.
Lupino's on stand performance was amusing and contrived at best. And I have always liked her, but in terms of garnering an Oscar nod, she had a better chance of that even with her role in High Sierra.
Go to the 10:28 mark in High Sierra when Lupino first is seen on film. As she gazed up at Bogart. That single unspoken scene showed more acting out of her than anything she did in TDBN. Go to 1:34:00 of High Sierra and again you see Lupino acting credibly and believable (and all of her scenes in between these as well!).
Sorry, but I find she was just harsh and without much depth in her Lana character.

I would have liked to have seen a better focus on the relationship of Raft and Bogart, but at the time Raft was a much bigger draw than Bogart and this film was clearly a Raft vehicle and not a Bogart story.

I like this film, and it is a good way to pass time, but there were No Oscar worthy performances in it.

reply

Well, Beatrice Straight won an Oscar in 1977 for NETWORK in which her entire performance was not much longer than Lupino's time on the witness stand is here. The size of the role is not a determining factor in my opinion, and I was talking Supporting Actress anyway. Also I think the courtroom scene works better if you read the whole character of Lana Carlson as a woman used to getting what she wants who is OBSESSED with getting the one thing she can't get: Joe Fabrini.

Everyone's entitled to their own view of the piece.


Never mess with a middle-aged, Bipolar queen with AIDS and an attitude problem!
roflol (><)

reply

BWAH-HA-HA-HA-HAAAAAAAA!!!!! :-)

reply