A critique of segregation/racism?


I'm not positive, but I believe I detected in this movie an oblique criticism of American racism. Of course, simple realism demanded that the menial laborers-- baggage handlers, cooks and servants-- be black, but it seemed to me that the shots including them made them rather conspicuous, so that we can't help but notice all the drudge-work is done by black people. And of course there is the bit of comedy early on involving the baggage handlers finally tricking Taylor and his associate into taking Smith's luggage (including the pigeon cage)and running off. Granted, that could be taken as a dig at the lazy and duplicitous baggage handlers, but Taylor and his company were not presented in a very positive light to begin with, and I think even in 1939 the audience might not have thought it very kind of them to saddle the baggage handlers with heavy luggage indefinitely while they looked for Smith. Couple this with the brief but striking shot of the elderly black man looking reverently up at the statue of Lincoln, and a theme may be detected. The reality of legal segregation and a general inferior position for blacks contrasts sharply with the democratic, egalitarian ideals Smith is smitten with. Again, I'm not sure about this, but I think on some level Capra (who produced the wartime film "Negro Soldier," highlighting the contributions of black soldiers) meant his audience to contrast the stirring demand for justice that Smith was making on the Senate floor with fact that segregation and a generally inferior position was the reality for blacks in America (indeed, in Washington D.C.). It's subtle, but I believe it is there.

reply

You're not the only one who picked up on the racial cues either in this film. Capra had many characters and frames of references in his movies that I've seen that I did double takes the first time I noticed them. The Bolshevik professor in 'You Can't Take It With You', Gary Cooper weeping in 'Meet John Doe', suicide in 'It's A Wonderful Life', and interacial romance in 'The Bitter Tea of General Yen.' Mr. Capra made some great films but got his deeper messages across subtly which did not detract from the overall enjoyment of the movies for me.

reply

[deleted]

Yeah, this movie contains some few scenes that are obviously a subtle criticism to the rampant racism that existed back then in USA, and that nowadays is still alive and kicking to some extent.

Brave decision by Mr. Capra. Today would be something natural to show a black men in the Lincoln memorial. Back in 1939 perhaps wasn't well received by some kind of people.

reply

I think you posters are over-thinking this. What you witnessed is called "casting". This movie wasn't particularly subtle about anything. I think you can agree that Capra was a very much "in your face" type of director. Many porters were black, a fair amount of food industry workers were. I'm sure you realize that the Senate had NO blacks in the 1900's until the late 1960's. So this is not a big revelation. Sometimes we see things that aren't there, sometimes not. I don't think Capra to throw in a few dark skinned blacks and show something. Was showing brightly white people showing something? Was showing a lighter skinned black at the Lincoln Memorial a part of the casting philosophy instead of showing a darker skinned person? Lots of stereotypes here anyway. A country bumpkin, a hyperbolic press, crooked politicians, etc. The only reason the kids were so overtly bossy to their dad was to accentuate his false bravado and more expose his ineptness and bow to power.

reply

You can do all the 'deep criticism' you want but in this film and It's A Wonderful Life Capra had blacks as 'ordinary people' in crowd scenes - that is ALL the message I need.

reply

Yeah, I agree that this film was hitting out at segregation. It gives all the monuments and iconic statues in Washington some love, but it's really focused on Lincoln. The fact that he included a de-segregated "workforce" at the boys' paper - with the black kid on staff - was a subtle message, but it was there nonetheless.

reply