WORST


I love Hitchcock movies, but this one is my least favorite, the plot is very dull. But that's the only Hitchcock movie i dont like

reply

There are some very typical Hitchcockian things that are already evidenced here:

the claustrophic setting
the fascinating twisty camera work
double levels
spy holes or watching someone else
getting caught doing something secret
the bad guy is the good guy or vice versa or both
moments of suspense heightened by the sense of imminent capture or discovery (audience participating in criminal or culprit behavior)

reply



Jamaica Inn is reportedly one of Hitchcock's least favourite films. He wasn't involved in the scripting process. And there was no cameo.

So this movie is not exactly a Hitchcock picture.

reply

I don't think Hitchcock ever did a bad film, there is always something that makes a Hitchcock film worth watching but I agree that this was his worst film. It is probably because the book is so good and Hitchcock didn't really have much to do with the direction on this film, he just let everyone else get on with things. I don't think Hitch cared much for Jamaica Inn.

"Everybody be cool this is a robbery!"

reply

I'd have to agree, to a degree....
This one was kinda hard to sit through... But there was enough "hitchcock" to keep me seated through the movie... and that's all...

P.



Trust me,
Swan

reply

Aww, come on now, it wasn't that bad of a movie.

reply

I could think of several Hitchcock films that I like less... but then, I have seen "Jamaica Inn" 3 times by now, and I'm still loving it!

reply

[deleted]

Any Hitchcock film that is rarely seen tends to be overlooked and under-rated.

reply



Seriously, I think everyone needs to see all of Hitchcock's films before declaring one as the worst. I've not seen them all yet either, but I likely have 25-30 of them and I'd place Jamaica Inn higher than 6 or 7 of those at least.



.

reply

I have (just) seen all Hitchcock's films and though I don't much like thids it is very good film for its time. It's ludicrously melodramatic but look at the cutting - so many shots, quick cutting.

Also people have NO IDEA what Hitchcock thought of his films - or anything else. His interviews with Truffaut are completely misleading. He hardly mentions Fritz Lang and yet there are many echos of Lang in his early films - though Hitchcock overtook Lang in quality.

Hitch says nothing about Easy Virtue and yet it is a very well made minor film which Marnie seems to echo. Hitch spent his life trying to get away from thrillers. He started off with wider interests and had to find ways of making the films he wanted while still superficially thrillers - like Vertigo and The Birds.

Curiously the Birds was probably an idea he had long before Du Maurier's story as it owes a lot to a 1930s novel by Frank Baker called - The Birds!

reply

I agree with this on the Truffaut interviews. If you read the transcript, you can see Hitchcock letting himself be led by Truffaut's enthusiasms. It would have been nice if he'd injected more energy into the exchange, given a bit more credit, added more context and detail. Of course, Truffaut had such intense views about the work, Hitchcock took the lazy way out and let himself be smothered in praise without giving much back. Kudos to Truffaut for the interviews and reviews he did over the years.


reply

I'm quite surprised by the lack of positive praise for Jamaica Inn. Although it may not have been Hitchcock's best in terms of technical skill the story was engaging enough for me even if it was predictable. Charles Laughton was excellent as the villian and Maureen O'Hara in my opinion did quite well on her debut.

"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not".

reply

Worst? Wow, sure I haven't watched much Hitchcock, but this is one of the ones I've enjoyed the most so far. Laughton, O'Hara, and the supporting actors I think did well. The story was interesting enough because of the characters.

reply

Yeah, 'Rich and Strange' is one of Hitch's weakest entries.

On Jamaïca Inn: although it is an uneven affair, there are a handful of scenes bathing in a typical Hitchockian atmosphere.

JAMAICA INN: 5/10

reply

I love Hitchcock movies. His technique in suspense always tickles me. The scene where Mary is on the roof and looking down through a small space to see some gang members looking up in order to hang the squire slays me.

I found that his best work resulted under the push and pull relationship he had with producer David O Selznick.


Smoke me a kipper. I’ll be back for breakfast

reply

You singled out one of the best shots/scenes of the movie.
I totally agree with you on this scene!!

I have to disagree with your opinion that his best work resulted under David O'Selznick.

reply

Do you mean Jem? I thought the squire was the gang leader.

reply

I was pretty bored watching it, but it could be partly due to the fact I couldn't understand half of what was being said. The audio on my DVD was poor. Maybe I'll try watching it again sometime and listen harder.

reply

[deleted]

There are some great shots but its an uneven picture.

Its that man again!!

reply