MovieChat Forums > The Bride Wore Red (1937) Discussion > The Bride Wore Red - 1937 - Reevaluated

The Bride Wore Red - 1937 - Reevaluated


The Dorothy Arzner film "The Bride Wore Red" was on TCM this morning. Given the well known facts that it was based on a Molnar play about a reformed prostitute, originally intended for Luise Rainer, and that it was somewhat changed into more of a Cinderella story for Joan Crawford, I think the film still holds great value and should be evaluated again, on it's own terms, by it's detractors. First off, the cast is impeccable. Then there's the story that had to adhere to post code dictates, and Louis B. Mayer's even greater influence on MGM product after the death of Thalberg. During the pre-code era, Thalberg would have allowed the film to display more of the racier elements that were originally intended. What remains is still a very interesting and well acted film. To start, the credits are lovely and we start to hear what continues as a beautiful film score by Franz Waxman. The opening scenes with George Zucco and Robert Young are sophisticated, brilliantly written, and a marvelous set up for a story that delves into what are the conflicted emotions of many characters in all classes of society. Joan Crawford gives a truly moving performance and plays each nuance of her character with precision. Her conflicted feelings, motivations, and frustrations are beautifully played and believable throughout. When her character feels the need to be either snobbish, friendly, charming, happy, sad, or overwhelmed, her motivations always seem to make sense and taking on such a complex character is not easy for an actress to do. Her socially awkward scenes with Billie Burke come off beautifully. Crawford's character, Anna Vivaldi, has been around long enough to know how to diffuse the snobbishness of Bille Burke's character. One of my favorite scenes is when Billie Burke is on to Crawford's character and is overly rude. Crawford diffused the situation by being extremely kind. No character is the film knows what is or isn't truly real to them, except perhaps the Franchot Tone character, Julio. He knows who he is and what he wants. He has feelings for the Crawford character, and is constantly trying to persuade Crawford's character, Anni, to find the truth in what she REALLY wants out of life. Eventually, she realizes that a life with Tone would be real to her, but how she comes to that conclusion is fascinating, and we soon realize that there are all kinds in all classes of society. This is truly one of Crawford's best performances of the late thirties and I recommend it to those who haven't seen it. I also recommend it to those who have seen it. Perhaps you'll enjoy it more than the last time you saw it. Between the cast, the direction, the story, the score, and the settings, it's really a wonderful film.

reply

Great post Barry Trexel. This is one of my favorite Crawford performances at MGM. What I like about it most is that she really plays an unlikable character and doesn't compromise by trying to be "nice". It really is a wonderful character study and the productions values are great. The red bugle beaded dress of the title is truly spectacular and even in black & white it seems to look shockingly red. Even with the production code strictly in force by 1937 it still comes across that the Crawford character is more prostitute than lady and Dorothy Arzner's direction is superlative.

reply

Nice review and in depth BarryT. I cannot understand why this film was so poorly received in its original release. Not a huge Crawford fan but she held her own here.

reply

Not formatted for easy reading.

reply


agreed, eb: when I see great slabs of text like the OP's, I figure the writer is indifferent to whether the message is read -and so I don't.

reply

Interesting review and it sealed it for me to DVR it this morning.

Web www.jmberman.com
Fcbk https://www.facebook.com/catnipdream

reply

What you have posted here is good. I accept much of your point.
And yet, I continue to find this unpleasant to watch. Both Franchot Tone and Lynne Carver are too pure, too honest and sincere to be real human beings. The wandering, floating telegram that we just know will ultimately show up again to unmask the deception.
Too much is contrived.

reply