What a Bore


Nobody loves Golden Age movies more than I do, but this one eluded me. Powell's personality and the 1893 Chicago World's Fair keep the first 20 minutes interesting, but once Luise Rainer appears, get ready for some L-O-N-G scenes that aren't entertaining. In fact, I found her repellent - how in the world did she snag an Oscar for this? By the time Myrna Loy appeared, even she couldn't rescue the film from the twin fatal blows of overly long production numbers and Rainer's obnoxiousness.

Oh well. The production was extravagant, I'll give it that, and the oddly erotic scenes of female spectators feeling Sandoz' muscles were worth seeing.

Is it true that Alan Jones dubbed Dennis Morgan's voice in the "Pretty Girl" number? What in the world for? Morgan had as good a voice as Jones'(but not as good as Jones' son, Jack's) and was just as famous as a singer. Maybe the package MGM bought from Universal stipulated that Jones have a part.

Unless you have a lot of spare time and some chores to do while the movie's on, put this in a low spot on your "to view" list: maybe above Mr. Skeffington and Maytime, but not far. Yankee Doodle Dandy it ain't. I wonder what the Oscar competition was that year - must have been dismal.

reply

I just found out that Luise Rainer won the Oscar that year over Irene Dunne in *The Awful Truth*. !!!! Unbelievable! Louis B. Mayer must have bought that Oscar; Dunne is wonderful and runs circles around Rainer, and the film is so much better than *Ziegfeld*. But MGM had a lot of Oscar clout, and presumably Columbia, as only a "major minor" studio, couldn't compete.

reply

[deleted]

I'd agree that the film is beautiful.

So is Mr. Skeffington, very successful at creating the feel of the time and the character(?) of Fanny. My big problem with that one is the moral at the end: "A woman is beautiful only when she's loved." Wait a minute -- Job is blind now and can't see that she's not physically beautiful any more, and she accepts his love ONLY because everyone else has abandoned her.

I did enjoy seeing the person that Davis and Perc Westmore pulled out of their inexhaustible bag of tricks.

reply

"Ijust found out that Luise Rainer won the Oscar that year over Irene Dunne in *The Awful Truth*. !!!! Unbelievable! Louis B. Mayer must have bought that Oscar; Dunne is wonderful and runs circles around Rainer, and the film is so much better than *Ziegfeld*."

The Awful Truth and The Great Ziegfeld came out in 2 different years. Luise Rainer won both years. She might have been better in The Good Earth (the movie she was in that won over The Awful Truth) than she was in The Great Ziegfeld.

Anyway, all I can really say about The Great Ziegfeld is that it may be boring (a lot of long movies are) but I think it makes up for it in its musical numbers.

reply

You are right, and I apologize. Rainer in *Ziegfeld* won over Dunne in *Theodora Goes Wild* that year. It was the next year when Rainer, in *The Good Earth*, beat Dunne in *The Awful Truth.*

Trivia: Rainer's 'renunciation scene' on the telephone, after Ziegfeld has married Billie Burke, was taken from Poulenc's one-person opera *La Voix Humaine,* which in turn was based on the story by Jean Cocteau.

I haven't seen *The Good Earth* but I still can't imagine that Rainer, or any actress, could be better than Dunne in TAT. The public and critics are unpredictable though; many of the films considered tops today didn't hit when they were released. It's well known that Mayer had a lot of influence over the Academy in the 30s, and I cling to the suspicion that his hand was in the outcome of those two years.

I'm glad that *Ziegfeld* is entertaining to some (one man's meat is another man's poison) and I hope I've convinced someone out there that *The Awful Truth* is worth seeing.

reply

[deleted]

"Obsessed" seems to overstate the case, but Dunne's comic timing is probably the most appealing thing to me about her, and The Awful Truth is the perfect vehicle for it.

I've read some more about Rainer, and it seems she was an independent and strong-minded woman. Bravo to her for that. I'll try to see The Good Earth and hope that her acting in it isn't off-putting the way it is to me in Ziegfeld.

At the risk of being ornery, I still wonder if Rainer's performance tops not only Dunne but Garbo, Stanwyck, and Janet Gaynor.

reply

[deleted]

I haven't seen Cimarron yet. After Giant, Edna Ferber is a bit grandiose - I have to be in the right mood. I know it brought Dunne her first acclaim, and I should see it if only for that. Will look forward to your reaction.

Bravo again to Rainer for standing up to Mayer. I read that Thalberg was her advocate, and after Thalberg's death Mayer, who didn't like her, tried to stick her into sappy sentimental movies (the kind he liked). She wouldn't play along with him, and that included refusing to drip with diamonds and furs like a "movie star" when she went to the grocer or the dentist. So they never got along and she didn't make another important picture after The Good Earth. But she liked stage acting better and did a lot of that after the MGM years.

By the way, I also like Paul Muni very much. Check out his birth name - gives John Garfield's a run for the money and reminds you why stage names were sometimes needed!

reply

WHATEVER!!!

The Great Ziegfeld is one of the best classic movies ever and Luise Rainer is ABSOLUTELY FABULOUS in it!!!!!!

reply

Couldn't agree more. This movie is long and old-fashioned, which will turn off some impatient viewers, but makes up for it with great musical numbers and songs. Luis Rainer is so charming in this movie, I was spellbound by her charm and grace!

reply

whenever i watch "the great ziegfeld" i'm completely spellbound by the genius of william powell. his eyes twinkle with ideas.. giant landscapes which only he can see. he devours the petty problems with his grander schemes.. giving away just enough to capture the faith of his friends & rivals unto himself... to create beauty. i find this approach to life astounding & mind-boggling. a snake oil salesman for art.

reply

I'm right in line with the last few of you. Other than a couple of draggy stretches, I think TGZ is captivating. Sure the music and sets are grand. I agree that Powell nails the bravado and panache of what we think the real Ziegfeld must have been like, although the real one was probably not as nice as Powell'w fairly nice portrayal.

I loved the friendship between Billing's and Ziggy. I thought Audrey was delightfully scheming. I understand different viewpoints, but I still say this was a grand (though admittedly a little grandiose) movie, that managed to put a fair amount of drama into the mix of show and style.

reply

<<<I still say this was a grand (though admittedly a little grandiose) movie, that managed to put a fair amount of drama into the mix of show and style. >>>
I can't agree more. Obviously those complainers need a reasonable criterion and a little more patience to appreciate the film. Though the script surely could have been better, especially from today's point of view.

Luise Rainer's acting is just great, which won her a well-deserved Oscar. Her acting as a poor humble Chinese girl in her next film, "the Good Earth", won her another Oscar. Interestingly, I noticed the difference of her accents in these two films, she probably somehow faked her accent for this film.

In this film, except the heartbreaking telephone scene, which is absolutely the best moment of the film, her comedical performances in the first half of the film are also surprisingly enjoyable. Especially the 20-gallon-milk scene and "be be ... be married" scene, she is just so lovely, delicate and naturally funny.




reply

[deleted]

I agree 100%. Luise Rainer is one of finest and most skillful actresses in film history and she would be better known if only Hollywood didn't try to fit her into the "mold". Like Katherine Hepburn (only more so), she would NOT allow herself to be made over. But because she could make it on the stage, both here and in Europe, she just split the scene rather than duke it out in Hollywood, which she found culturally strange in any event. Too bad. It's truly our loss.

reply

For a woman who made less than 10 films, Luise Rainer IS NOT one of our finest actresses in history.

reply

Any film that makes the audience wait 2 hours and 15 minutes for Myrna Loy to appear is off on the wrong foot. ;) And then she isn't given much to do but play the supportive wife for the last 45 minutes of the show. Such a waste.

Really, my main problem with the movie is just that Ziegfeld's life story, apart from his theatrical achievements, isn't particularly compelling. Carny promoter becomes notorious when he realizes that Sex Sells. Marries an insecure French singer, his first musical star, later loses his wife because he cheats on her. Becomes famous for his lavish musical revues, but he's always operating on credit. Marries again, has a kid. First try at dramatic theatre on Broadway is a flop, but rebounds to produce Showboat (represented in the film by a marquee and a few bars of "Old Man River" during a montage sequence) and a few successful but now-forgotten shows. Finally broken by the stock market crash in '29. THREE HOURS to tell that story!

If only they had spent more of the time on the Follies numbers, although those were probably more impressive on the giant silver screen back in the day, too. Fanny Brice was interesting, mostly because I could see why Streisand was such a sensation in Funny Girl. Babs really did practically channel her in the '60s. I'd like to have seen Fanny given more to do, as well.

reply

[deleted]

I agree, Ziegfeld's life story isn't strong enough to hold a movie. The movie is too static. We see a lot of pieces of Ziegfeld's extravagant shows. His life itself is simply sketched out.

I think Luise Rainer is ridiculous in this and most everything I've seen her in. Beyond the highly mannered, OTT, stylized performance, she's a solo act. She acts by herself and anyone in a scene with her may as well be a cardboard cut-out. She's doing her rolling eyes, her gestures, her scurrying, her vocal stylings, and the other person can't affect what she's doing one bit. It doesn't matter what they do, she's acting past them. It's like they're a prop and she's gonna do her Luise Rainer thing come hell or high water.

reply

I am in the process of watching all of the Best Pictures, I own them all and am watching in order. Therefore having just completed "the Great Ziegfeld"

I have a few things to say.

1. The Genius that is William Powell is what made this movie.

2. I found it interesting that Ziegfeld could never be satisfied with the show that he had, kind of like Yancey Cravat in "Cimarron", who could never settle down and always wanted to explore new territory.

3. I don't know how any true fan of film can sit there and say that this movie isn't great.

4. From start to finish there was nothing lame ot stupid about this movie. It was a fitting tribute to such a phenomenal man. The elaborate musical sequences were choreographed to neat perfection. The movie contained the perfect mix of emotions from a hint of comedy to the love story of the ages. "The Great Ziegfeld" is one of the most powerful films in the history of Hollywood.





Source:
I own over 1200 movies in my personal collection, so having watched so many films.

reply

As I write this Aug 30, 2010 Luise Rainer is still alive (over 100 years old). She was amazing in TGZ and The Good Earth. As is written somewhere Zeigfeld was responsible for The Good Witch in the Wizard of Oz, he left Billie Burke penniless after all the extravagance and she had to go back to work in the movies to support herself. Any way William POwell was great in this and IMHO made the picture.

reply

^^Agree with you. We must also consider the times in which this film came out and how audiences would have viewed it compared to other films. There was not the level of choice in entertainment in 1936 that we have today. A film about a famous showman with unbelievable musical production numbers and sets that entertained for 3+ hours would have been seen differently than we would judge it today. I loved this film and the acting in it. Perhaps the only annoying bit was Frank Morgan's raucous laughter all the time, especially after leaving his investment house after the fall of the stock market. Luise Rainer was terrific in this as was Powell plus we see Fanny Brice, Will Rogers and Eddie Cantor which made it seem all the more real.

reply

We only see the real Fanny Brice. Will Rogers and Eddie Cantor are played by actors.

reply

I disagree about the movie being 'boring'. One thing that obvious helps it is the spectacular extravagant musical numbers (ah, if only they had had 3 strip Technicolor in those days it would've looked amazing in this film). Another big thing going for the film is William Powell.

While it may be a disappointment to not see more of his frequent movie co-star Myrna Loy, they can't rewrite history so extensively as to make her character be in the entire film. While I don't think Rainer's performance screamed Oscar, I didn't find her overly annoying either. If you want to see annoying you can always watch K. Hepburn in Bringing Up Baby -- one of the most annoying and idiotic lead characters ever in a 'classic' movie.

I also liked the film Mr. Skeffington while agreeing with other posters about that line about a woman 'only being beautiful when she's loved' being a crock.

Is Ziegfeld Best Picture material? Well, from an Oscar perspective when Best Pic often goes to movies for simply being longer than 2.5 hours and being about a number of years in a character's life, then yes it fulfills the basic requirements. I don't know off the top of my head if it was the Best Film made that year, but isn't too far off the other nominees listed, some of which are also really good movies, but not quite 'great' in the way you'd expect. The Oscars have a long tradition of not picking the best film for their big award.

Still, I really enjoyed Ziegfeld and despite my wish to go make some soup for lunch while watching my time-shift recording of this off TCM, I decided to put it off because I was pretty engrossed in the film and didn't feel like an extended break. I give the film an 8/10.

----------

If you're watching 'Fullscreen' DVDs, you aren't getting the whole picture.

reply

I honestly don't know a thing about Ms. Rainer, because this is the first film I've ever seen her in, so eventually I'll digress once I see more of her films. But in the mean time, I don't care how good she was, she was not, and I repeat WAS NOT better than Irene Dunne in TAT until proven otherwise. How can you top such an amazing and comedic performance? I agree with the op. It was a conspiracy. That oscar was BOUGHT. MGM was practically a monopoly around that time, and they wanted it to stay that way, so I don't put it past them.

reply

Irene Dunne was boring and NOT funny in The Awful Truth...

reply

[deleted]

I agree with you that three-strip Technicolor would have been wonderful, but the actors would have been burned alive.

The stages were far too large to light for that process considering the huge dance sequences they did. By comparison the stages for "Wizard of OZ" were probably one quarter that size, or smaller, which made them easier to light.

reply

Dennis Morgan was a last minuit replacement.
And there was not time to record his voice for the film.
So they used Allan Jones prerecorded tracks for the film.

reply

I'm watching it right now, some of the scenes aren't worth watching, like some of the musical numbers. But, I love the dialogue until the middle. William Powell is genius! It is a bore after awhile. The beginning has the real
zing'.

reply

If you can't appreciate the acting that was displayed by Luise Rainer in this film... I feel sorry for you. =P

reply

[deleted]

Well, you have to understand the historical and cultural context of these movies. I think the (presumably) "behind-the-scenes" telling of the impresario who brought fame to Billie Burke, Will Rogers, Fannie Brice, Eddie Cantor, Ray Bolger and the rest was irresistibly informative to audiences of the time.

Nowadays, however, no one cares about someone named "Ziegfeld" and so the movie has to hold up on its own - which it clearly doesn't.

I think it's a very well-made movie - albeit boring at times - but the fact that it's never been shown as frequently as "The Good Earth" says alot about its dated nature.

You wanna know my BIG gripe??? NO W.C. FIELDS!!! He was a major Ziegfeld Headliner prior to his film career - yet no mention of him.

I suppose W.C. (who was under contract to Paramount at the time - but who had also been loaned out to MGM to play "Micawber" in "David Copperfield") wanted more money than MGM was willing to pay - but I say it would have been worth it: it would probably have extended the movie's appeal at least to fans of Fields as one of his specialty films not to mention offer the re-creation of a truly historical Fields moment:
his original - or at least portions of - his original juggling/billiards act???
"Don't call me 'honey', mac."
"Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"

reply

Discussing who did and who didn't win the oscar in any given year is interesting, but it's ultimately meaningless. Elevating one performance over another is a very subjective thing. Most people seem to be of the opinion that the academy gets it wrong at least as much as it gets it right anyway. So the arguments in this thread about Irene Dunne being better than Luise Rainer don't hold much water IMHO (especially when the those arguing for Dunne at first didn't even have the correct info about which role she played the year Ms. Rainer won for TGZ, and then one poster states that even though it was LR's performance in The Good Earth that "won" over ID's in The Awful Truth, Ms. Dunne still derserved the oscar...even though that poster had never even seen The Good Earth!). Some people really like Irene Dunne. I get that...I like her myself, and I think it stinks that she never won an oscar, since it seems to be so important to some people (same goes for Myrna Loy, BTW). But none of that has anything to do with the fact that Luise Rainer is magnificent in The Great Ziegfeld! Conventional "wisdom" holds that she won simply for the "phone call" scene - I would argue that her performance was not only heartbreaking in that particular scene, but was also comedically brilliant all the way leading up to said scene. What a light touch! Off the top of my head I can't think of another performance like it, ever.

I also happen to like the fact that TGZ is pretty much divided up into "wife-halves", the second of which goes to Myrna Loy as Billie Burke. The first time I saw it I waited and waited for Ms. Loy to show up! Throw in Virginia Bruce as a self-destructive showgirl and the wonderful long, slow sequences that give you a sense of what it must have been like to be at the Ziegfeld Follies at the turn of the century and early part of the 1900's ("A Pretty Girl Is Like A Melody" anyone? What an amazing sequence!) and it all adds up to a wonderful, one-of-a-kind snapshot of a bygone, near-forgotten era. I love The Great Ziegfeld!

"Love has got to stop some place short of suicide."

reply

Let me throw in my two cents:

Irene Dunne was nominated in 1936, but it was for Theodora Goes Wild rather than The Awful Truth. So Rainer won over her twice (which makes me think of the two wins for Hilary Swank over Annette Bening; in 1999 Swank won for Boys Don't Cry over Bening's outstanding work in American Beauty, and in 2004, Swank won for Million Dollar Baby over Bening for Being Julia, a great performance in a weak film).

The other nominees for 1936 were Gladys George for Valiant is the Word for Carrie (my personal favorite being that I'm a big fan of George's acting), Norman Shearer for Romeo and Juliet (miscast and pretty dreadful, though she has her defenders), and Carole Lombard for My Man Godfrey (and who probably should have won - a performance that really holds up today and is still the quintessential "screwball" characterization). My only complaint with Rainer's win, in a really good performance, is that I consider it a supporting role. This was the first year for the supporting categories, but since MGM was pushing her to become a leading star in their roster, they would not have demoted her to supporting. By the way, the New York Film Critics also voted Ms. Rainer as the year's Best Actress for Ziegfeld. That group didn't add the supporting category until the '60s.

In 1937, Rainer was up against the aforementioned Dunne for The Awful Truth, Barbara Stanwyck for Stella Dallas, (another great actress who never won the competitive Oscar), Janet Gaynor in A Star is Born, and Greta Garbo giving probably the best performance of her career in Camille and one of the best female performances committed to film (obviously my personal choice and the New York Film Critics' winner). But again, Rainer is quite good in The Good Earth, giving a very touching and heartfelt performance.

"The answers to all of life's riddles can be found in the movies."

reply

I agree with the OP but I still enjoyed this movie. I had the flu while watching so I was very entertained to lie there inert and watch all the lovely show girl scenes with revolving layer cakes of scenery and huge gauzy draperies. Even though it was extravagant it wasn't gimmicky like Busby Berkeley.

I was surprised and bored at how long the Luise Rainer scenes were. They could easily have been cut in half for my money. I see from this post that some people love her but I just find her hammy.

reply

I wonder what the Oscar competition was that year - must have been dismal.
If only this were true. Unfortunately, 1936 was, in my opinion, the best year for movies ever. 1936 gave us My Man Godfrey, Mr Deeds Goes to Town, City Lights, Libeled Lady, Suzy, Swing Time, Camille, San Francisco, Dodsworth, Come and Get it, and many, many others.

reply

My problem with this movie is that I never rooted for Ziegfeld. The man always got what he wanted. He always got the women. Whenever it seemed he was out of money he would find an easy way to make his shows. There was never any challenge for him.

Someone I rooted for was Billings. Whenever he had something, Ziegfeld took it away from him...performers, women, and even his valet. There came a point in the movie where I wanted Billings to actually get away with something because Ziegfeld always ruined it for him.

I think the acting was great. But overall, the screenplay needed a rewrite. Too much time was spent on the musical numbers which were a bore, and some things should have been left on the cutting room floor. Like the whole subplot about the little girl who plays the piano who later appears as a woman and Ziegfeld gives her a job. I mean, what was the point of that?



"Let us be crooked, but never common."

reply

I hate Hollywood production numbers, and nightclub scenes in movies. Frank Morgan was fun to watch, but otherwise the only things interesting were seeing the real Ray Bolger and Fanny Brice perform.

reply