Give that cat an Oscar


I have never seen such a reaction that the cat gave viewing his master changing to a werewolf. I wonder how they got that cat to react like that. It made that scene the scariest for me. As for some of the critics of this movie...lets not forget, this was the first werewolf movie Universal made and it was 1935...years before a Larry Talbot. Obviously the technical aspects were more advanced in "The Wolf Man". There was no set rule how to kill a werewolf, so at that time, the thought of a bullet would do, until years later someone concocted the idea of a 'silver' button could only do the trick. I preferred Hull's makeup more, cause he looked half human. Also the story line about the flower was more intriguing than the latter werewolf tales. I was surprised on how many British actors were in this movie..I realized many of them came to Hollywood just before the second world war and left England for safer grounds...but this was 1935..Germany threatened England 5 years later. Hull was a gifted character actor, never a leading man and an American from Kentucky. There also was "December Bride" Spring Byington as that Aunt of gorgeous Valerie Hobson. I think she was an American also...so most likely it was filmed in Hollywood.

reply

Sorry. A little late with my reply. But since I saw WEREWOLF OF LONDON way back in 1972 on TV I have fallen in love with that intense cat scene. Its marvellous and elevates the intensity and foreboding terror of his transformation.. Great!

reply

That cat scene scared the s..t out of me, more than all of the "Wolf Man" with Lon Chaney, jr.

reply

Interesting. I thought Hull's werewolf makeup looked incredibly amateurish, considering what they had come up with for Frankenstein just a few years earlier and for The Wizard of Oz just a few years later. The makeup was almost as bad as the acting in this one. lol

reply

If you are going to say a movie has bad acting in it, then back it up with an example. I did not see any bad acting except when some actors were supposed to be speaking a foreign language. But that can't be blamed on the actors. That is the fault of the scriptwriters for not making that part accurate.

"Do All Things For God's Glory"-1 Corinthians 10:31
I try doing this with my posts

reply

If you are going to say a movie has bad acting in it, then back it up with an example.


You apparently didn't see these other threads:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0027194/board/thread/99967646?d=214404637#214404637
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0027194/board/thread/214404895

I watched the film 3 years ago, so I can't remember anything more specific than that. And I disliked it too much to bother to rewatch it now.

reply

that was really coming through watching it, after seeing the scenery on the dvd the movie doesn't build up to the cover... i find no setting of london in this, though they are pointing from the balcony but no footage what they're pointing at, and wasn't this the werewolf movie they forgot to show a shot of the moon in? i heard that on the commentary to wolf man (1943) which i took for granted was the original, but i guess that was a second take on this script starting it all over with better result. i couldn't care less that the sneaky people on the bench were attacked, and how long are they going to go about convincing people there is a werewolf, let's just accept it, i bought the movie titled werewolf in it, okey. here's something you might want to know, there is actually a song titled "the werewolf of london" on the cd "elvira presents revenge of the monster hits". i got this on a double feature along with "she-wolf of london" which you have to read the small print on the dvd to realise it was part of the package, i'm not kidding, once on the dvd menu it's clear there are two movies on the dvd though... and that was the better one of the two. you make a good point, thinking about it the flower bit was kind of intriguing.



🌃




movin through thick fog,
close to night fall,
driftin till your lighthouse came through,
see things clear with you,
as you open the sea and gives a full view.

reply

There really should be a best animal award at the Oscars. The person who worked the most with the animal would recieve the award.

reply