MovieChat Forums > Anna Karenina (1935) Discussion > Superior to Leigh's version

Superior to Leigh's version


I read Anna Karenine, all 900 pages of it, and then, even if i didn't like the book as much as I wanted, i went to rent the two film versions, Leigh's and Garbo's. I was prepared to prefer Leigh's, I don't really know why, maybe because i adore her as an actress. But after having watched both, i must say Garbo's version is for me superios, especially apparent at the end, when she's going to the train station. Vivien speaks and practically explain that she is thinking of "turn of the light, since there's nothing more to be seen...". She talks, she talks, she sees the train, the little man with the beard, and she puts herself on the rails. Then, you SEE the train as it is killing her.

Garbo's portrayal of the suicide seen is MUCH MORE SUBTLE. It was not prepared. She sees Vronski, happy with his mother and maybe the girl that will become his wife. The train leaves. She stays there, alone, remembers the scene at the beginning, but says nothing. She places herself in front of the train and watches it as it gain speed. You see in her eyes all what's going through her mind, you understand if perfectly. She has no other choice, you FEEL it, you know it. Still you don't know if she'll jump.
She does.

This is just an exemple, but it is the one that striked me the most. I must also say i loved the beginning scene in the Constance Brown film.

Any toughts?

"Well, I think if people loved eachother more, they'd shoot eachother less!"

reply

I could not agree more. To me Leigh's Karenina was and remains a disappontement. She just seems detatched in this part, unlike her great performances in "Gone with the wind" and "Streetcar named desire". Garbo seems to really embody this tragic heroine and she has that something we could call the russian soul. Also from the very first moment she appears magically through the smoke at the train station you feel that she is doomed and that she has a tragic destiny. Nothing calculated about this as you said, it just seems that the forces of destiny lead her inevitably to her doom. She also has that wonderful quality of conveying emotions with her eyes and body languages and she hardly needs any words for it. This is why our first glimpse of Anna and her suicide scene are so overwhelming.

reply

> She also has that wonderful quality of conveying emotions with her eyes
> and body languages and she hardly needs any words for it.


Don't forget that Garbo had risen to prominence in the silents, when you *had* to do it without words.

Although it was intended (and succeeded) as parody / satire, there is also a fair amount of truth in the Norma Desmond line: "We didn't need words. We had faces!". At least, there is truth to it when you're talking about the creme of the silent actors (and not the more common overly demonstrative ones who appear to be more caricature than character). Garbo was always among the most subtle of silent actors; she rose to stardom on that ability. It served he well in talkies too.

reply

That's CLARENCE Brown!

reply

Of course, Garbo is superior.

"Greta Garbo is the Sarah Bernhardt of film" - Sir Laurence Olivier. ;)

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

This version was FAR more superior to Leigh's version. You took the words right out of my mouth in that last paragraph. The suicide scene almost moved me to tears.

reply

[deleted]

I agree with you.Garbo's portrayal of suicide was much better.You can see the pain the doubt and the fear in her eyes.Vivien Leigh's portrayal was just ridiculous

reply