Who Killed the Scots Terrier?


Good film, but who killed the little Scottish Terrier at the beginning? Did anybody say, or was it just left up in the air?

reply

I was hoping to find the answer to that myself on this board. Did the kennel club really have all that much to do with the plot anyway? Murder mysteries of this vintage never seem to play fair with the audience and always let us down in the area of detection.


...Justin

reply

It's implied (though not ever proven) that Archer Coe himself killed the Scottie, thus giving one more person (Sir Thomas MacDonald) a motive to kill him.

reply

You're probably right. I wish the movie had made that more explicit. The filmmakers should have known we'd all be wondering about that dog.

I wonder if the remake ties up that loose end better: imdb.com/title/tt0032299/.


...Justin

reply

Nay, I just noticed watching it now that the butler, who takes the phone call from the dead dog's owner, is wearing a coat, and that's when I wondered if the butler, likely on instructions of his master, Archer Coe, killed the dog.

reply

For the win.

reply

I'm glad I was not the only one at a loss as to what happened with the dog.

reply

I wondered about this too. Perhaps the film originally answered this question, but all we ever see now are edited versions with this part cut.

I checked the original novel by S.S. Van Dine (available online at gutenberg.net.au/ebooks04/0400411h.html) to see if it answered this question. However, no dog is killed there. Sir Thomas MacDonald, owner of the murdered dog in the film, isn't even a character in the book. The only Scottie is the dog found wounded in the Coe house. A big chunk of the book is about tracing the owner of this dog, with lots of praise for the wonderful way the AKC keeps accurate records and cameo appearances by the author's real-world dog-breeding friends. A Doberman also figures in the plot, but in a way that differs somewhat from the film.

reply

The dog was killed by wrede. he lied about having a flat tire. he hated mcdonald for stealing his girl hilda. you didn't pay attention.

reply

I think it's reasonable to assume that Wrede killed the dog, but it's not clear from the movie. Hilda didn't tell Wrede until after Archer Coe's death that she wouldn't marry him, that she intended to marry Sir Thomas MacDonald. So, Wrede still had hopes of marrying Hilda, which being discovered to have killed the little dog she liked would have ruined. Also, if he lied, it was more likely to cover his being in and out of the Coe house all evening -- he needed to explain where he'd been.

Wrede said he went to the club to see Hilda but that she had already left. If so, I think the dog would have been killed before she left the club.

reply

The title caused me some hesitation. Then, the movie started and all I saw were a bunch of dogs. Is this what I'm going to be watching? When the dog was killed I almost stopped the movie right then. This better not be a whodunit about a dead dog.

Thank goodness that wasn't the plot! Soon someone was killed, then two; then an attempted murder so who cares who killed a dog? It didn't matter. Why would you focus on a dead dog and not the actual plot which was two dead people?

The dead dog was to make us think that was the killer's motivation. We see Sir Thomas saying he'd kill the person who did it. He and Archer Coe had a rivalry over which dog would win the ribbon. It was to throw us off; just as the Chinese cook and the sale of the vases to Grassi was to add possible suspects to the mix.

The movie starts with a dog show so any of those people could have killed the dog. Maybe Brisbane had someone kill him to throw suspicion off himself if it came to that. At some point someone might question why he did not leave town as planned; the very night his brother dies.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply