Astounding.....


The film features very little bloodshed, all of which is contained within the last five minutes, yet it's darker and more visceral than any film for decades yet to come. The agonized wails of those undergoing vivisection, coupled with Kathleen Burke's pathos inducing reactions to the threat of further treatment call to mind a complete understanding of the torment suffered by those who, without anesthetic, are taken under the knife for prolonged operation and experimentation.

And, of performances, Charles Laughton provides the film with one of those rare villains who is well written, well-acted, and yet who does not warrant any of the audience's sympathy. Laughton's Moreau is a cruel, pitiless, taskmaster whose only motivation is an insatiable thirst for knowledge unhindered by ethic. And Arthur Hohl's conscience stricken Montgomery provides a worthy foil for the comparison.

And lastly, the creature makeup itself was fantastic. Again the story finds itself several decades ahead of itself as Ouran, the pigman, and several of the others looked truly unlike any other special effects creations of that era. Wally Westmore's makeup artistry ranks among those of Lon Chaney or Frankenstein's Jack Pierce. It is with no surprise that I discover that it was Westmore who transformed Fredrick March from the gentlemanly Dr. Jekyll to the brutish and ape-like Eddy Hyde.

I can only wonder why this film is not as well remembered as other horror films such as Dracula and Frankenstein. Being released in 1933, it's possible that the rise of the Hays Code would have made its rerelease impossible for nearly two decades or perhaps the implied violence was more than audiences of the 30s could handle. Whatever the case, I certainly feel as though it deserves greater recognition than what it has received.

reply

Agree completely with the OP - just watched this for the first time in many years and was very impressed. Superb Laughton performance - even this young he could have a tendency towards hamminess, but he's just terrific here, especially the way he uses his voice.

"In my case, self-absorption is completely justified."

reply

Very well written review. I agree with all of that and think this is a real horror gem.

reply

Thank you.

reply

Great post Skye Reynolds. Oh I think this film is very well remembered by anyone who's ever seen it. It is so bizarre and disturbing that we tend to keep it in a very deep, dark area of our hearts and rarely speak of it with others. Kind of like a guilty pleasure. The movie "Freaks" is in this same category.

It is not even remotely a movie for kids or even teens under (?) years of age. These are some of the groups of movie watchers that tend to keep the horror classics "well remembered" as they grow older.

reply

Thanks, kbarada.

reply

Agreed. In fact, I think the makeup in this looked better than in the subsequent versions.


"I'll book you. I'll book you on something. I'll find something in the book to book you on."

reply

I also agree!
I'm a horror fan... Been one for 40 years... Yet this film has somehow eluded my viewing pleasure... Until today, that is....
This film is FANTASTIC! This film should be shown every Halloween... And throughout the whole year... Any horror fan who hasn't seen this, is really missing out!

Trust me,
Swan
My, you're nosey, aren't you?

reply

I saw it tonight for the first time. I give it the highest rating. I found it moving. It almost brought me to tears. (The plight of the half men/half animals. And the House Of Pain.) It makes me wonder if depression era audiences turned out in droves to support this wonderful film.

reply

Oh, I agree wholeheartedly. Skye_Reynolds. But for the grace of God, and it's coming out a full year and counting from the more iconic Universal early sound horror classics, sadly, put Island Of Lost Souls into a position that in publishing would have made it a remainder; or even if not that, an awkward, seemingly out of its period project, thrown away, as it were, on double bill.

A first rate cast of players, plus the hot, up and coming Charles Laughton, gave it a kick, but this wasn't enough to make it resonate with moviegoers. Yet the years have been exceedingly kind to the film, if not its print, or the one I saw several months back. This picture is in desperate need of a rediscovery, if only of the Freaks variety (and these films have a few things in common) to give it a push. There's so much in it, much of it gloomy and pessimistic, to tie it to the period in which it was made.

reply