MovieChat Forums > Female (1933) Discussion > Pettigrew's speech?

Pettigrew's speech?


After Drake breaks down and flees her boardroom, Pettigrew follows her and tells her, in consoling tones, more or less "it's because you're only a woman"(I can't recall any exact wording, unfortunately).

Is he playing Devil's Advocate here? Trying to focus her thoughts and goad her into action rather than actually speaking his mind? For, to Pettigrew's apparent satisfaction, that's exactly what she does: she stops crying and takes action...but only to go and submit to Thorne totally, which seems to rather put Pettigrew's words in a literal light.

reply

He is goading her into getting her back on track. It is reverse psychology.

reply

Pettigrew was verbalizing all the common attitudes and opinion of the day. Reminding Drake of the obstacles she had to battle to get where she was. Reminding her she didn't want to throw all that hard work away for nothing.

At first, I thought Pettigrew was being a dick. But I remember the admiration he had for her the whole movie. He was always her biggest fan and cheerleader. I suppose he took over the role usually played by the spinster, middle aged, motherly character in movies where the Alison Drake type character is played by a man.



No two persons ever watch the same movie.

reply

Devans00 says > Pettigrew was verbalizing all the common attitudes and opinion of the day. Reminding Drake of the obstacles she had to battle to get where she was. Reminding her she didn't want to throw all that hard work away for nothing.
That's an interesting take. I agree that Pettigrew cared a lot for her but he hadn't been in the board room when she broke down. He just saw her come out in tears. He seemed to be encouraging her to be human for a change. When she headed back in, he seemed surprised.

Later, after deciding to go to New York to meet with the bankers, Pettigrew tried to remind her of her obligation to the company. She was going to throw it all away to pursue Jim. He didn't want to encourage that because she was risking it all. She could potentially lose the company and still not get Jim back.

Ultimately, I believe Pettigrew wanted the best for her, whatever that would turn out to be. When she was content being involved with various men, Pettigrew was fine with it. He even made bets in support of her continuing that route. However, when she was no longer happy living that way, he supported a change. He just didn't want her to be irresponsible in the process.

Luckily, with Jim's help, she did the right thing. She saved the company but also changed her own personal focus. She was obviously not the kind of person who could juggle both a high-powered career and a family life. Good for her!


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply

mdonln

Ultimately, I believe Pettigrew wanted the best for her, whatever that would turn out to be. When she was content being involved with various men, Pettigrew was fine with it. He even made bets in support of her continuing that route. However, when she was no longer happy living that way, he supported a change. He just didn't want her to be irresponsible in the process.

Luckily, with Jim's help, she did the right thing. She saved the company but also changed her own personal focus. She was obviously not the kind of person who could juggle both a high-powered career and a family life. Good for her!


It was nice to see such a complex woman character such as Alison Drake. Especially from 1933.

Too bad Female 1933 didn't start a trend in similar movies. The film noire genre did feature a lot of strong women characters. Unfortunately their goal was only to get their man instead of striving for self fulfillment.

No two persons ever watch the same movie.

reply