MovieChat Forums > The Purchase Price (1932) Discussion > what's up with that ending???

what's up with that ending???


Fires burn his crops and the movie ends as they unite to face life together...I guess.

reply

It seems it could of stood another reel as Brent and Stanwyck seek out a little prairie justice. I guess since the crops were not completely destroyed and the two were finally united as a couple that we had all we needed to know.

reply

...I've thought that height-/depths-of-the-Depression movies DID fall into a tendency - Maybe in part just to make the movie a little shorter for the double features that were becoming a craze then , and , in part , just to SAVE MONEY! on the movie's production , to rather rush past the ending developments of the story in order to get it over and done , so to spak , make it a reel or so shorter than it , really , should be .
Just saving money , and , perhaps the figure that a sprint past wrapping up all the plot points at a proper speed wouldn't be noticed - much - by the audience , once the story had been wrapped up in a satisfying conclusion .
For the only other example I can cite right now , in NIGHT NURSE , the disposal of Clark Gable's gangster happens off-screen , and is simply referred to in a line of dialogue !!!!!!!

reply

***"NIGHT NURSE" SPOILER***

###

Ah yes, but don't you think Gable's death was well done in this manner? I think it was more effective the way it happened off-screen and the ambulance driver refers to it. It also adds to the comic aspect of the male lead, who isn't even slightly bothered by what his goons have done!

reply

I don't really agree that the seemingly abrupt ending was an effort to keep the film short. If they were looking for sequences to cut, you would think they might start with the lovely, but discursive, sequence where Stanwyck helps with the newborn baby and mother. No, I think the filmmakers just thought that the couple finally uniting while putting out their burning wheat crop made for a great climax (and a great counterpoint to their earlier wedding, which was more like a grotesque financial transaction). I like when older movies end with an image that sticks with you rather than giving you a final scene or two that wrap up loose ends.

reply

It did seem rather abrupt; it's not shown that Brent is wholly successful with the crops (presumably he will be) and does not address what might happen to the wheat burners or if they will try their evil deeds again but the "main issue" of the story that Brent has now forgiven and loves Stanwyck is resolved. Presumably there will be no future problems for them on their farm given this happy ending.

reply

it was awful.i totally agree......and what about about her poor maid ? she pretty much ruined her life, conned the farmer and even eddie for the money.. she should have stayed in the city with her gambler...he was sexier anyway !

reply

Ha ha. Yeah, that was an abrupt ending, but I still enjoyed the film. I only felt sorry for poor Eddie, getting beaten up and Stanwyck didn't even go over to see if he was okay after that. He was a nice guy even if he was a gangster.

Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Cried

reply