MovieChat Forums > Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1932) Discussion > SEE! One of the WORST performances in Sc...

SEE! One of the WORST performances in Screen History!


March rightfully deserved his Academy Award as J&H; he clearly relished this dual role as opposed to his usual romantic leads. Miriam Hopkins was shamefully cheated out of a nomination by having the bulk of her part cut out by censors -the restored footage demonstrates how truly heartbreaking and pathetic in her misery she is as Ivy. It would be decades before another actress would bare herself so completely in a performance,

But on the other side of the art, what about the true stinker of all screen performances? I refer of course to Jimmie Eagles in the 1930 DW Griffith talkie of Abraham Lincoln. Eagles is displayed as the young deserter whom Lincoln pardons as "a leg case."

Eagles' is one of the most embarassingly bad performances ever captured on film. His performance is so painfully wooden, he is so obviously reading his lines, and he makes no attempt at all to "act" in anything but the most theatrically artificial manner that even in an era of so-called "bad" silent movie acting, his performance -or lack thereof- stands out as jaw-droppingly bad.

I would put Eagles on a par with the unidentified child actor playing Mary in the 1931 Dr. Jekyll & Mr Hyde, who infects the only blot in an otherwise flawless film classic. Her "acting" is mortifyingly awful as she exclaims that she can walk. It is literally as if they were auditioning girls for the part, having them repeat the same words over and over and then someone just stuck the aution footage into the film. I'm willing to wager that this scene was originally removed from the film for artistic rather than censorship reasons.

She also ranks just behind the supremely wooden performance of Mary Philbin in the Chaney Phantom of the Opera -a performance remarked on even at the time as being 'old-fashioned' and 'artificial.'


"If you don't know the answer -change the question."

reply

Oh yes I just mentioned that in another post about the little girl who statically exclaims "I can walk sir!" I find that scene really eerie to be honest, the way she walks towards the camera with a sinisterly static chuckle.

reply

Hmm, yeah, she's not great, but perhaps they were aiming for the (admittedly sickeningly cute) 'Ahh' factor...As a contrast? Just a thought..















"You only pretend you're bad." Yojimbo

reply

That is probabaly what they were aiming for... but it came out very frightening!

reply

I agree she was awful. But at least she is only on for a few seconds.

reply

I've since learned that, as per the novel, there was another sequence cut prior to the film's release, where Hyde in one of his rampages tramples a little girl who turns out to be Mary.

I've seen a production still of the scene and it appears that Hyde is really stomping her down , too (echoes of Day of the Locust?)! Talk about payback!

"If you don't know the answer -change the question."

reply

That poor little actress really did stink up the joint in her one scene. Still, the movie is superb in spite of her.

reply